In a stunning reversal, Norwegian public health officialdom now speaks of 'immunity' vs. Covid-19 without once talking about 'vaccines' (because there's no data to do so)
Fundamentally,anyone who talks about ‘Covid infections’ is talking nonsense because nothing was spreading. This has been conclusively demonstrated in analysis of the global excess mortality statistics by Denis Rancourt. Once you take on board this fact, the rest of the narrative, measures, vaccines etc all crumbles.
I would try to find the original comment on this. But it was a few years a go and I cant even recall which platform read it. It was in connection to convid and some pro jab nutter spouting about modern testing is better than old useless methods.
I personally think Kock's Postulates stands true today.
I wonder: Is Covid still that big a deal in Norway as it seems? Here, it's only ever brought up in the context of BP/AP (Before Pandemic/After Pandemic) as point of temporal reference to events.
It's like nothing happened, and we all agree on what it was didn't happen, kind of thing. Also, unsettling and eerie.
Oh, every now and then you have people mentioning their umpteenth 'infection' or whatever, occasionally one also sees a moron wearing a mask who's not a tourist from East Asia (personal favourites: open-air train stations in the countryside).
Every now and then, NRK or others write about it, but that's it.
Expect positioning shuffle, eg the “good soldiers” making it to WHO on a whim (no one there can turn down a Brundtland acolyte). He can then rejoin his DK counterpart.
And the public sector’s (and their civil servants) riddance of accountability continues in perpetuity.
Once they successfully sell us a gigantic lie, they can sell us a whole hierarchical associated set of mini lies. It all makes sense to those who had swallowed the big lie. The continued gas lighting concentrates on those little lies. These don’t have much impact on those who did not buy into the big lie, but they keep the critical mass of enablers believing. It is this critical mass that largely determines the final outcome - continuity of the criminal enterprise ruling us.
Of course this is all done to keep the divide & conquer party going, if only to keep going, a tad longer, the cognitive dissonance on a societal level.
You know, these 'studies' and 'papers' are often so piss-poor in terms of quality and design, it's hard not to avoid the conclusion that they're scrambling every day to figure out new ways not to 'fess up.
And then there's the entire 'other' angle that I can't rule out: these people--you know, like Preben Aavitsland in Norway, Peter Hotez in the US, and their ilk--they are ardent believers in the (magic) of 'vaccines'.
No amount of evidence or the like will change their mind, like, ever--and I wonder if some angry parent showing up at their doorstep or attacking them on the way to 'work™' might do (mind you, I'm not advocating that, but it's an interesting question to ponder…)
Fundamentally,anyone who talks about ‘Covid infections’ is talking nonsense because nothing was spreading. This has been conclusively demonstrated in analysis of the global excess mortality statistics by Denis Rancourt. Once you take on board this fact, the rest of the narrative, measures, vaccines etc all crumbles.
https://odysee.com/@shortXXvids:e/Rancourt-1---nothing-was-spreading:8
It's nothing new, as 'Science' wrote the following a decade ago:
'We Need to Fulfill Koch's Postulates'
https://www.science.org/content/article/ron-fouchier-new-coronavirus-we-need-fulfill-kochs-postulates
I read somewhere that Koch's Postulates is out dated and not suitable (to today's corrupt medical system).
I dunno know about this (having never looked this up), but facts and evidence are certainly useless in this time and age.
I would try to find the original comment on this. But it was a few years a go and I cant even recall which platform read it. It was in connection to convid and some pro jab nutter spouting about modern testing is better than old useless methods.
I personally think Kock's Postulates stands true today.
I wonder: Is Covid still that big a deal in Norway as it seems? Here, it's only ever brought up in the context of BP/AP (Before Pandemic/After Pandemic) as point of temporal reference to events.
It's like nothing happened, and we all agree on what it was didn't happen, kind of thing. Also, unsettling and eerie.
Oh, every now and then you have people mentioning their umpteenth 'infection' or whatever, occasionally one also sees a moron wearing a mask who's not a tourist from East Asia (personal favourites: open-air train stations in the countryside).
Every now and then, NRK or others write about it, but that's it.
Expect positioning shuffle, eg the “good soldiers” making it to WHO on a whim (no one there can turn down a Brundtland acolyte). He can then rejoin his DK counterpart.
And the public sector’s (and their civil servants) riddance of accountability continues in perpetuity.
I don't expect anything but the continuation of this shit-show: rules for thee, but not for me.
Gov't is highly implicated, as is the military (I presume: Warp Speed was a military operation), hence I suspect NATO, too.
There's no way one can take on these structures and come out victoriously.
I agree.
The plot (or clot, perhaps) thickens, increasingly uncovering inconsistencies. Quiet before storm.
Once they successfully sell us a gigantic lie, they can sell us a whole hierarchical associated set of mini lies. It all makes sense to those who had swallowed the big lie. The continued gas lighting concentrates on those little lies. These don’t have much impact on those who did not buy into the big lie, but they keep the critical mass of enablers believing. It is this critical mass that largely determines the final outcome - continuity of the criminal enterprise ruling us.
Of course this is all done to keep the divide & conquer party going, if only to keep going, a tad longer, the cognitive dissonance on a societal level.
Is this how they will back out slowly...until people forget they were killing us and making us sick?
It looks like it, doesn't it?
You know, these 'studies' and 'papers' are often so piss-poor in terms of quality and design, it's hard not to avoid the conclusion that they're scrambling every day to figure out new ways not to 'fess up.
And then there's the entire 'other' angle that I can't rule out: these people--you know, like Preben Aavitsland in Norway, Peter Hotez in the US, and their ilk--they are ardent believers in the (magic) of 'vaccines'.
No amount of evidence or the like will change their mind, like, ever--and I wonder if some angry parent showing up at their doorstep or attacking them on the way to 'work™' might do (mind you, I'm not advocating that, but it's an interesting question to ponder…)
Heavens to mergatroid ( kiwi expression) THIS IS Bloody(another kiwi-ism) GREAT News. Long nay this return to sanity continue …..
Huhum, do you mean the low uptake rates or the piss-poor studies?
Greets to New Zealand!
I see vaccine mentioned at least once. Is it being suggested that the vaccine is responsible for immunity? I know this is the case elsewhere.
Oh, of course they do mention it in this 'causal' context, for otherwise they'd look like morons, isn't it?