It says so in the original; my point--exposed in these pages from the beginning--is that no-one should take these jabs.
Sadly, by putting pregnant women into the category of 'vulnerable populations', they will continue doing that. Same with the RSV jabs currently undergoing trials. Switzerland is no different.
It says so in the original; my point--exposed in these pages from the beginning--is that no-one should take these jabs.
Sadly, by putting pregnant women into the category of 'vulnerable populations', they will continue doing that. Same with the RSV jabs currently undergoing trials. Switzerland is no different.
At this point, I think we can safely call this entire shit-show what it is: a gigantic test of one's intelligence and character.
Yah, but one point of the post seemed to be that Switzerland was growing a clue about publicized harms, stillbirths etc among them. The blind spot is remarkable.
I'm not saying you're wrong, but to me this entire classification of pregnancy as a 'danger' that somehow makes a woman 'vulnerable' seems like yet another front in the all-out war against reality.
I mean: there's really but two biological-behavioural things to further the species: food intake and procreation, and given that pregnancy is now considered 'dangerous' to warrant administration of this untested product, it's another IQ test.
It says so in the original; my point--exposed in these pages from the beginning--is that no-one should take these jabs.
Sadly, by putting pregnant women into the category of 'vulnerable populations', they will continue doing that. Same with the RSV jabs currently undergoing trials. Switzerland is no different.
At this point, I think we can safely call this entire shit-show what it is: a gigantic test of one's intelligence and character.
Yah, but one point of the post seemed to be that Switzerland was growing a clue about publicized harms, stillbirths etc among them. The blind spot is remarkable.
I'm not saying you're wrong, but to me this entire classification of pregnancy as a 'danger' that somehow makes a woman 'vulnerable' seems like yet another front in the all-out war against reality.
I mean: there's really but two biological-behavioural things to further the species: food intake and procreation, and given that pregnancy is now considered 'dangerous' to warrant administration of this untested product, it's another IQ test.