As the Progress Party moves to the top of the polling pile, a once-in-a-generation opportunity to break the political hegemony of socialist Norway: will they pull it off?
Question is whether they’ll do what was done in France and Austria and close ranks against the “far” right thereby strengthening the democratic process…
After decades of “Toxic Femininity “ through Woke language forced changes and using emotions and identity ideology instead of logic /reason/ respect to communicate and express opinions , masculinity have now found political ways to be seen and heard
Not cuckholed
DEI indoctrination through out academia and government (all levels of bureaucracy) has created these intolerant conditions
I don't take it, already seen that in my country, pure liquid propaganda, pure smoke in the eyes. Far right are much better with propaganda then others. And it's pretty easy to ride the unhappy unsatisfied sentiment around in the old Europe, with strong slogan and promises that once in the Parliament/Government they'll quick forget.
The only question in a poll I would pose is "How much that party/politician likes to earn good money, manage power, get richer through politics?"
Nowadays they all have a price and can be bought, the ethical values, philosophic principles, or wise behavior are only good when they go to the WC. Sorry to say that, but you've got to be blind if you don't see it in the last say 20/30years. Or as I use to say: you don't wanna see. That is another popular choice nowadays.
Parties? Democracy? Elections? Politicians? Bureaucrats you mean...
That time is gone, ladies and gentleman, at least in the criminal western culture society where we all live in today in EU.
West since a while is made by Criminals for Criminals, sorry. There is no more space for the honest, wise, men and women.
But if you like the illusion of a better future through elections and parties, good luck! Enjoy your dream then! ;)
I thought this one might tempt you to comment: welcome, Kazimir. First up, not that me posting stuff doesn't necessarily imply agreement with, or even liking whatever I write about.
I'm with you on all of the above, and I do consider Norway is a quite telling test case: no EU (officially), virtually none (or at least only a few, re-branded and re-routed through the UN refugee resettlement program) illegal immigrant-invaders since 2017, lots of 'extra' income via selling oil and gas--it won't get much 'better™', eh?
Turns out, though, that Norway's immigrant population is about the same as Austria's (approx. 20%), which is achieved via bureaucratic shenanigans by reclassifying Ukrainians (the same is done across East-Central Europe): https://fackel.substack.com/p/how-govts-are-obfuscating-the-problems
Turns out, though, that 'despite' all of the above, people appear to be quite unhappy with the status quo, the Norwegian variety of the de facto uniparty, and hence the polling numbers. I doubt that any of the above would significantly change following a victory by the Progress Party for all the reasons you mentioned. And then there's the little known factoid that in terms of foreign policy (sic), the Progress Party platform doesn't differ from that of their competitors: pro-NATO, pro-US, pro-war.
I hold them in equal contempt as their peers, in particular as they are quite much like the US-neocons who all were, at one point Leninsts/Maoists (in the 1960s), and you can easily see how these 'labels' aren't an issue (in fact, I'd wager that after FDR (in the US case) and after WW2 (in Western Europe), 'the free world' looked more like a de facto Bolshevik régime, albeit with an external multi-party system (as opposed to the Soviet style of having 'Marxism-Leninism' de facto meaning 'politics' and whatever 'opposition' there was to be found, it was within the CP) and with less obvious oppression. I suppose the term 'imperialist de facto Bolshevism' would be appropriate here).
It's also quite stunning as Høyre (mainstream 'RINO') was leading in the polls a year ago, ahead of Labour--and now we're told that this is now so different? I suppose this is, much with what looks like the Trump 2.0 psy-op, merely the all-aboard roll-out of the next phase of the régime abroad/outside the US centre as the 'old guard' has so thoroughly discredited itself…
I think we can forsee an "everyone against FRP"-coalition government with virtual certainty, and co-optation and dilution of the FRP's most popular talking-points.
Denmark's Dansk Folkeparti, Sweden's Sverigedemokraterna, Front National of France, et cetera - /in every single WEF-province/ it doesn't matter how you vote, because you get the same Globalist capitalist totalitarian agenda anyway.
Next will be an EU-wide ban on wrongthink-parties.
As we have said here in Sweden since the 1950s (before my time): "You can't vote the bankers out of office" (the idiom in Swedish refers to a specific banking clan, one the motto of whose is "Esse non videre".
Becayse why be covert when you can hide behind overt so much better?
I would merely add that 'the powers that be™' will similarly downplay what, e.g., the students said about 'fear of Swedish circumstances', 'immigration', and 'cost-of-living' problems.
As an aside, Austrian state broadcaster ORF was spot-on today with their reporting about Mette-Marit's son being taken into custody instead of focusing on what looks like a massive turn-around in Norwegian politics. Because priorities, I suppose.
Question is whether they’ll do what was done in France and Austria and close ranks against the “far” right thereby strengthening the democratic process…
I'm quite certain they'll try that, of course, but given the generational potential, it might not work…
Herr Epimetheus
Same polling trends in Canada
After decades of “Toxic Femininity “ through Woke language forced changes and using emotions and identity ideology instead of logic /reason/ respect to communicate and express opinions , masculinity have now found political ways to be seen and heard
Not cuckholed
DEI indoctrination through out academia and government (all levels of bureaucracy) has created these intolerant conditions
Generational change in process
Tusen Takk
Ha det bra
Jon
And then there's the whole 'conservatives outbreeding liberals and lefties' thing to consider.
I don't take it, already seen that in my country, pure liquid propaganda, pure smoke in the eyes. Far right are much better with propaganda then others. And it's pretty easy to ride the unhappy unsatisfied sentiment around in the old Europe, with strong slogan and promises that once in the Parliament/Government they'll quick forget.
The only question in a poll I would pose is "How much that party/politician likes to earn good money, manage power, get richer through politics?"
Nowadays they all have a price and can be bought, the ethical values, philosophic principles, or wise behavior are only good when they go to the WC. Sorry to say that, but you've got to be blind if you don't see it in the last say 20/30years. Or as I use to say: you don't wanna see. That is another popular choice nowadays.
Parties? Democracy? Elections? Politicians? Bureaucrats you mean...
That time is gone, ladies and gentleman, at least in the criminal western culture society where we all live in today in EU.
West since a while is made by Criminals for Criminals, sorry. There is no more space for the honest, wise, men and women.
But if you like the illusion of a better future through elections and parties, good luck! Enjoy your dream then! ;)
I thought this one might tempt you to comment: welcome, Kazimir. First up, not that me posting stuff doesn't necessarily imply agreement with, or even liking whatever I write about.
I'm with you on all of the above, and I do consider Norway is a quite telling test case: no EU (officially), virtually none (or at least only a few, re-branded and re-routed through the UN refugee resettlement program) illegal immigrant-invaders since 2017, lots of 'extra' income via selling oil and gas--it won't get much 'better™', eh?
Turns out, though, that Norway's immigrant population is about the same as Austria's (approx. 20%), which is achieved via bureaucratic shenanigans by reclassifying Ukrainians (the same is done across East-Central Europe): https://fackel.substack.com/p/how-govts-are-obfuscating-the-problems
Turns out, though, that 'despite' all of the above, people appear to be quite unhappy with the status quo, the Norwegian variety of the de facto uniparty, and hence the polling numbers. I doubt that any of the above would significantly change following a victory by the Progress Party for all the reasons you mentioned. And then there's the little known factoid that in terms of foreign policy (sic), the Progress Party platform doesn't differ from that of their competitors: pro-NATO, pro-US, pro-war.
I hold them in equal contempt as their peers, in particular as they are quite much like the US-neocons who all were, at one point Leninsts/Maoists (in the 1960s), and you can easily see how these 'labels' aren't an issue (in fact, I'd wager that after FDR (in the US case) and after WW2 (in Western Europe), 'the free world' looked more like a de facto Bolshevik régime, albeit with an external multi-party system (as opposed to the Soviet style of having 'Marxism-Leninism' de facto meaning 'politics' and whatever 'opposition' there was to be found, it was within the CP) and with less obvious oppression. I suppose the term 'imperialist de facto Bolshevism' would be appropriate here).
It's also quite stunning as Høyre (mainstream 'RINO') was leading in the polls a year ago, ahead of Labour--and now we're told that this is now so different? I suppose this is, much with what looks like the Trump 2.0 psy-op, merely the all-aboard roll-out of the next phase of the régime abroad/outside the US centre as the 'old guard' has so thoroughly discredited itself…
I think we can forsee an "everyone against FRP"-coalition government with virtual certainty, and co-optation and dilution of the FRP's most popular talking-points.
Denmark's Dansk Folkeparti, Sweden's Sverigedemokraterna, Front National of France, et cetera - /in every single WEF-province/ it doesn't matter how you vote, because you get the same Globalist capitalist totalitarian agenda anyway.
Next will be an EU-wide ban on wrongthink-parties.
As we have said here in Sweden since the 1950s (before my time): "You can't vote the bankers out of office" (the idiom in Swedish refers to a specific banking clan, one the motto of whose is "Esse non videre".
Becayse why be covert when you can hide behind overt so much better?
I think you're correct in your assessment.
I would merely add that 'the powers that be™' will similarly downplay what, e.g., the students said about 'fear of Swedish circumstances', 'immigration', and 'cost-of-living' problems.
As an aside, Austrian state broadcaster ORF was spot-on today with their reporting about Mette-Marit's son being taken into custody instead of focusing on what looks like a massive turn-around in Norwegian politics. Because priorities, I suppose.