More Bad News from the Upside Down: 'Flurona' Jabs, mandated via Covid-derived decrees, are in the Work

The pieces are falling into place: even if mandates are revoked during spring, be prepared for the roll-out of combined Covid+Flu mRNA shots--and mandates--later this year

On Friday, 4 Feb. 2022, Covidistan’s vaccination mandate entered into force, and thus ended a 82 year-long hiatus in which the forced participation in experimental (investigational) medications was deemed unpalatable. If, like me (a historian), you prefer fancy dates to demarcate historical epochs, I humbly suggest using this particular date as the marker of the end of the post-WW2 period.

If you’re even more cynical about the prospects of organised human existence, you may also (even) wish to think about the period we’re entering into as a ‘pre-war’ era. You see, in human affairs, there’s before the war, the war, and after the war; let’s not mince words about history repeating itself or rhyming, let’s just agree that future historians will quite likely consider this abomination of a ‘law’ to be an enormous blunder.

Still, let’s not only decry this momentous event. Instead, let’s explore its likely consequences for Covidistan, its bigger neighbour whose Health (sic[k]) Minister Lauterbach is maniacally itching to impose the same kind of illegitimate mandate on the German citizenry, and the wider implications for the future of European civilisation.

Covid is a Smokescreen

A few days ago, eugyppius reported, however briefly, on a comment made by Christiane Druml, head of the Covidistan Bioethics Commission. Citing a pertinent news item in weekly magazine Profil, Druml is quoted as follows:

‘The Covid-19 vaccine mandate could be the beginning of a new effort to protect people against unnecessary [sic(k)] diseases like measles, whooping cough, and influenza—also with vaccine mandates’…asked about influenza, [Druml] opined that ‘society absolutely has an interest in avoiding unnecessary influenza waves’.

With the stage thus set, let us explore today why this inane statement is important, what it likely portends, and how it ties into the long-standing wet dreams of domination and technocratic expertise by our self-declared betters.

Any such consideration may appropriately begin by asking: who is Christiane Druml and what are her qualifications to make such unambiguous policy statements?

Well, Druml is the chairwoman of the Covidistan’s Bioethics Commission, a permanent advisory body associated with the Federal Chancellery. It was instituted by executive order, consists of 24 members who are appointed to three-year terms (for the current listing of members, see here), and Druml is the commission’s current head.

Who is Druml, then? According to the commission’s website, she’s the Director of the Josephinum, the Medical University of Vienna’s very own Historical Institute (which houses a cool collection of bespoke items from the past 250-odd years) and a Professor of Bioethics at the Medical University of Vienna. Her career, though, is quite telling: a trained jurist, her working life took her to leadership positions in the now-defunct Creditanstalt (yes, a bank) before she joined Parexel (big pharma lobbying firm) for which she led the Austrian branch (1989-92). By then, she ‘returned’ to academia and chaired the Faculty of Medicine’s ethics committee under the umbrella of the University of Vienna. 2007 Druml was appointed the Chair of the Bioethics Commission, a position she holds to this day.

Why is there a need to draw this out in such great detail?

Well, there are actually two valid reasons: first, note that Druml isn’t a trained physician, doesn’t have any training in public health, or, really, anything to do with medical research (I deem her ethics beyond mentioning).

Second, Druml has become quite notorious in Covidistan in these past two years, for she engaged in repeated vilification of ‘the unvaccinated’, suggested that ‘the unvaccinated’ should be made to pay higher co-pays and deductibles (this move, apart from opening a tremendously bad can of worms in any social-medical insurance system, is also legally and ethically questionable, which tells you enough about Druml’s ‘expertise’ in these matters, doesn’t it?), and now she’s calling for more vaccination mandates. According to Druml, vaccination mandates should have been introduced 1.5 years ago, which ‘would have saved us all a lot of time, emotional investment, and polarisation’.

Let’s skip any further commentary on the detachment and utter disregard on part of these self-declared ‘elites’ for issues central to European civilisation: self-reliance, the sovereign individual—incl. specifically bodily autonomy—and popular sovereignty.

Instead, let us focus on the implications of the above.

Keep Your Eyes on the Ball, Though

In light of the above, let’s briefly take stock of the major issues involved:

• There are lots of ever-changing mandates in place already, yet so far they are mainly delimited to all matters Covid-19, of both the disease and the social construct variety.

• Whatever will happen with respect to Omicron (BA.1 and BA.2, plus any future ‘variants of concern’) and these mandates, there is a secular trend to abolish many, if not most of them, over the course of the coming months.

Still, the powers-that-be are talking about the temporary nature of the abrogation of these mandates, conditional on the possible (re-) emergence of yet one or more ‘variants of concern’ come autumn (still, there’s close to zero mention of Covid-19 being seasonal, much like the other Beta Coronoviruses around, such as those that cause the common cold).

Access to many parts of the public sphere have been more or less circumscribed by these mandates (think: Covid Passports), and demanding ‘proof’ of whatever one’s medical status plus photo ID is such a powerful mechanism of control that it’s very unlikely that the powers-that-be would allow these mandates to lapse (cue the EU Commission’s recent ‘proposal’ to extent the ‘validity’ of the Covid Passports until late spring 2023 at the earliest).

If combined with the utter failure (and then some) of the currently available experimental gene therapeutics advertised by the powers-that-be and their camp followers in legacy media (of both the state and de facto state, i.e., ‘private’, garden variety) as ‘vaccines’, it is fair to assume that the illegitimate coercive pressure to get yourself a fourth jab with the current crap and/or yet another ‘updated’ jab in late summer/early autumn is in the works. In fact, the powers-that-be are already hard at-work preparing the roll-out of such ‘updated’ jabs.

If we the people don’t resist the (fake-) emergency-induced abrogation of civil liberties, individual sovereignty, and bodily autonomy now, life as we knew it Before Covid (B.C.), however imperfect our experiments in self-government were before, will become a distant memory. In other words: if we the people don’t resist this illegitimate and totalitarian power grab by the powers-that-be, future historians—if there will be any allowed—will deem the past two years as nothing but a harbinger of things to come.

The Shape of Things to Come

One of the early canaries in this particular coal mine occurred in early January when the Times of Israel reported on the first case of what they labelled ‘flurona’, that is, a patient testing positive for both Covid-19 and Influenza.

Similarly, if you’d care to check out my late-2021 pieces on, e.g., the Norwegian Institute of Public Health’s risk assessments (see here, here, and here), the Covid-related pieces all mentioned a plethora of other respiratory illnesses. Most prominently among them, of course, was Influenza, which was repeatedly, and in increasingly shrill tones, rolled out as a potential catastrophe that would be causing massive numbers of hospitalisations and death in January and February 2022.

I’m glad these ‘predictions’ didn’t play out as feared, but it’s crucially important to call them out for what they are: the floating of ‘explanations’ for a potentially sharp rise in mass casualties. Talk about crying wolf or ‘fire’ in a crowded movie theatre.

Still, the much larger implication of these and other likeminded statements was (is)—something else entirely.

All (industrialised and industrialising) countries already have extensive and overall transnational/cross-border cooperation and surveillance capacities for Influenza in place.

The past two years have seen the explosive—cancerous, i.e., malign—growth of roughly comparable, if not as-aligned, capabilities revolving around all matters Covid-19.

Covid-19-the-social-construct has many ‘advantages’ for the powers-that-be, first and foremost the fear (porn) factor, by which is meant that people who are kinda agnostic about any Influenza outbreak short of a renewal of a Spanish Flu-like mass casualty event isn’t going to scare anyone. Yes, seasonal influenza waves kill people every year, but no-one gets (too) agitated about this. (Don’t worry, the people behind the Covid-19 drama have tried to push the flu angle for some time, and for evidence just use a search engine and type in ‘avian flu 2009’.)

So, Covid-19-the-social-construct is much better-suited for weaponisation in terms of fear-mongering and the creation of an unnecessary state of exception without any clearly-identifiable end date or conditions that might allow a (re-) turn to a (new) normal.

Given these parameters, Covid-19-the-social-construct is actually even ‘better’ than the similarly open-ended (second) ‘War on Terror’ hoped for, and conspired towards, by the Transatlantic Neocons of the ‘Project for the New American Century’, implemented by G.W. Bush after 9/11, and furthered by his successors.

Why would I claim that Covid-19-the-social-construct is ‘better’? Well, in any ‘war’ there’s a visible adversary, and once vanquished, the war-related emergency measures must be, at least perfunctorily, rescinded. There’s actually no need or incentive to do so with an invisible adversary such as—Covid-19.

For the powers-that-be, Covid-19-the-social-construct is thus preferable to any ‘war’ against a ‘real’ enemy, for it allows for the introduction of tyrannical mandates and the like, which, precisely because they cannot easily be ascertained or falsified by anyone but government-aligned experts. It is very easy for anyone in power and their camp followers in the legacy media to shoot down any kind and form of criticism.

Think: ‘two weeks to flatten the curve’ to ‘maybe we’ll need to think about flurona’ today, everything in-between, and all the things the powers-that-be will conjure up in the coming months.

Such ever-changing ‘rules’ are, fundamentally, arbitrary: the end of any republic with a self-governing citizenry.

Covid-19 is a Kind of Hybrid Warfare

And as such, there are a number of avenues this hybrid war is waged by the powers-that-be against you and me, as well as, most importantly, against our children and their future. The main front lines include, but are by no means limited to, the following areas:

• Wrecking trust in the endurance of the rule of law, including civil liberties.

• Using all matters Covid-19 as a wrecking ball to destroy the state’s obligations in the medical insurance field; note that it doesn’t matter if these obligations are ‘publicly’ (think: Scandinavia, Canada, or the UK) or ‘privately’ organised (e.g., the US, Switzerland).

• Incidentally, both assaults appear coordinated, to some degree, by the transnational villain class (think Gates, Soros, Schwab and the WEF, and their ilk), but this isn’t the main point.

Sidenote: before we continue, one more clarification: whatever one personally thinks about the ‘transhumanism agenda’ supposedly behind all of this, keep in mind that the transnational villain class might wish to ‘augment’ themselves, but for the vast majority of people such ‘augmentation’—or even advanced treatment options—will not (never) become available.

What we the people will eventually get is the seamless integration of Covid-19-the-social-construct in the wider transnational/cross-border surveillance apparatus that exists for (against) Influenza.

And it is this ‘feature’ (not a bug) that renders Covid-19-the-social-construct so useful to further the interests of the above-mentioned transnational villain class: mandating Covid jabs as prerequisites is ‘part of the game’.

Even if the mandates are temporarily suspended now, we the people must keep an eye on their return ‘through the backdoor’ of combined Covid-plus-Influenza mRNA shots in late summer/early autumn.

As it stands, the powers-that-be appear confident that they be able to continue to mandate this or that crap shot as long as it includes, however spuriously, anything relating to Covid.

Covidistan: Laboratory of Post-Modernity

If, at this point in time, you’d ask for any kind of ‘proof’, let me take you for a brief visit to Covidistan, laboratory of post-modernity and Covid Insanity Ward.

Two days ago (4 Feb. 2022), the putschists’ civil-military advisory board GECKO met again, and their main findings—as reported by state broadcaster ORF—couldn’t be more obvious:

A situation report presented in Friday’s meeting advises that Covid-19 should be embedded ‘in the operational influenza surveillance structures from autumn onwards, provided that variants similar to those currently in circulation are to be found’.

Translation into plain English: we’re preparing ‘flurona’ shots, ideally to be mandated ‘through the backdoor’ of the Covid vaccination mandate (it doesn’t require any more legislation, a simple decree by the Health Minister suffices); if the people don’t approve of this, we can also conjure up testing requirements for new variants of concern.

Who is going to be affected by this crap, such as Moderna’s experimenta mRNA Influenza shots currently undergoing trials? I’m glad you asked (same source as above, my emphasis):

It would make sense to consider a booster with variant vaccines before autumn for all those whose third vaccination was more than six to nine months ago and to apply this in a similar way to the influenza vaccination.

If there’s any doubt left among those who claimed (thought) that compliance brings back freedoms and civil liberties—I challenge you to speak up now and present a coherent argument.

As Covidistan’s subject population awaits the ministerial decrees (Mückstein is currently preparing them), the country’s Chief Medical Officer ‘recommends yearly boosters in September’.

Don’t let anyone tell you ‘they’ didn’t inform you about their plans.

Plan accordingly as well, and maintain the pressure that the Committee of Public Safety won’t get it’s way.

#UNACCEPTABLE #RESIST THE MANDATES