'The increase of the excess mortality is positively correlated (both temporally and spatially) only with the number of vaccinations' in 2022 and 2023, according to a new pre-print by prof. Reitzner
I ended up working in a school for the first 6 months of 2023. That winter one of the 2nd years (13/14 years old) had a heart attack during PE lessons... they managed to get him back but the EKG readings showed his heart stopped dead and he dropped. It happened a couple of months before I started. The janitor told me about it, he also told me another kid he met that graduated the previous summer (18 years old) who had to stop playing sports also due to a heart attack. So two kids from the same school suffer heart attacks within months of each other... some would say all things being even that that's a statistical impossibility... but we know that currently all things aren't even.
So point being... it isn't just death we have to worry about in those age groups but also curtailed lifespans. Interestingly any teacher I brought this up with quickly changed the subject. It's increasingly hard to have a shred of respect for most of the 'adults' in this world. Their kids have been literally sacrificed to Moloch.
I also hate to be the bearer of bad news... Austria is not an outlier in this regard...
Holy ****. 34.1% for the 15-29 age group. The only thing other than the juice that could possibly explain this is that the young got so messed up by the lockdowns that they're now engaging in self-destructive behavior to a significantly higher extent than before. Do we have any data on overdoses and suicides?
Dr Makis regularly reports on youngsters, sporty ones, dropping dead or sudden turbo, stage 4 cancers, appearing. Also Mark Crispen Miller does a weekly global "Died Suddenly" still happening regularly, which includes many kids. No doubt lockdowns affected some young ones seriously, but these tend to be not suicide.
I haven't yet looked into ODs and suicides; let me get back to you on that one.
As I wrote, and with more explicit reference to the Pentagon declaring, on 10 Sept. 2001, that they were missing substantial amounts of money that had gone 'missing', you'll never 'guess' what happened the next day…
As the mortality in 15-29 age group is quite low to start with, the absolute numbers, even with drastic rise as in 2022 and 2023, the absolute number still remains low enough to not cause public uproar. When the phenomenon can only be caught by mathematcians, it will remain out of the attention of majority. But if this phenomenon continues, we will have to figure out how the society can function. All those old people whose mortality did not budge - who will take care of them, when young people are disappearing?
Exactly. It's quite a devious strategy tbh. I live in a capital city so I really would not notice if excess deaths were even at 100% greater than the historical normal. There's still so many people around.
There is much more to see.Pls check Norman Fenton on the Northern Ireland data.Load down the huge > 500 pages Rancourt data and search for Austria.I am writing an essay on the whole subject ,including the infamous lives saved piece ,where A suddenly jumped from position 13 in the preprint to 5….in Lancet
Still, even if prof. Rietzner gets this published, it will likely be in a second- or third-tier journal, which means little traction, much less attention.
Does the data go back further than 2020? The reason for asking is that I see the 0 to 14 age group had 10.8% excess mortality in 2020, which at first glance seems high. But we knew in 2020 when the first lockdowns happened and schols remained open (but then we all forgot during 2021 when we had to shut down the schools or go to distance learning to hype the fear just in time for the jab rollout) and we know now (again) that covid was not at all deadly for that age range. So it would be good to know if either (a) 10.8% is within standard deviation (is it statistically significantly different from zero?), or (b) what particular causes of death in 2020 were higher for that age group (perhaps youth suicide as a speculation)?
I ended up working in a school for the first 6 months of 2023. That winter one of the 2nd years (13/14 years old) had a heart attack during PE lessons... they managed to get him back but the EKG readings showed his heart stopped dead and he dropped. It happened a couple of months before I started. The janitor told me about it, he also told me another kid he met that graduated the previous summer (18 years old) who had to stop playing sports also due to a heart attack. So two kids from the same school suffer heart attacks within months of each other... some would say all things being even that that's a statistical impossibility... but we know that currently all things aren't even.
So point being... it isn't just death we have to worry about in those age groups but also curtailed lifespans. Interestingly any teacher I brought this up with quickly changed the subject. It's increasingly hard to have a shred of respect for most of the 'adults' in this world. Their kids have been literally sacrificed to Moloch.
I also hate to be the bearer of bad news... Austria is not an outlier in this regard...
https://open.substack.com/pub/patrickewalsh/p/irish-excess-deaths-ripie-august?r=y77rm&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
No, Austria or wherever you reside aren't outliers.
MSM and 'the experts™' are working overtime to normalise this, in virtually the same way they do it with, say, the pedophilia thing.
In the Netherlands it is the same yet 'experts' mention many different potential causes but never the jab.
Holy ****. 34.1% for the 15-29 age group. The only thing other than the juice that could possibly explain this is that the young got so messed up by the lockdowns that they're now engaging in self-destructive behavior to a significantly higher extent than before. Do we have any data on overdoses and suicides?
Dr Makis regularly reports on youngsters, sporty ones, dropping dead or sudden turbo, stage 4 cancers, appearing. Also Mark Crispen Miller does a weekly global "Died Suddenly" still happening regularly, which includes many kids. No doubt lockdowns affected some young ones seriously, but these tend to be not suicide.
I see it that way too, although here in Norway, very few children took the poison jab, hence you won't see this happen as often as elsewhere.
MCM was one of the first substacks I subscribed to.
I haven't yet looked into ODs and suicides; let me get back to you on that one.
As I wrote, and with more explicit reference to the Pentagon declaring, on 10 Sept. 2001, that they were missing substantial amounts of money that had gone 'missing', you'll never 'guess' what happened the next day…
As the mortality in 15-29 age group is quite low to start with, the absolute numbers, even with drastic rise as in 2022 and 2023, the absolute number still remains low enough to not cause public uproar. When the phenomenon can only be caught by mathematcians, it will remain out of the attention of majority. But if this phenomenon continues, we will have to figure out how the society can function. All those old people whose mortality did not budge - who will take care of them, when young people are disappearing?
Exactly. It's quite a devious strategy tbh. I live in a capital city so I really would not notice if excess deaths were even at 100% greater than the historical normal. There's still so many people around.
They can try to keep denying it.
But it was the same story everywhere.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/368426122_Australian_COVID-19_pandemic_A_Bradford_Hill_analysis_of_iatrogenic_excess_mortality
There is much more to see.Pls check Norman Fenton on the Northern Ireland data.Load down the huge > 500 pages Rancourt data and search for Austria.I am writing an essay on the whole subject ,including the infamous lives saved piece ,where A suddenly jumped from position 13 in the preprint to 5….in Lancet
I'll have a look--would you mind sharing the piece here, too, once you're done? Is there anything I could do to help?
"If this paper passes muster (peer-review"
And there you have it. Seems to me it is a huge IF.
Let's wait and see, do keep us updated Epimetheus!
We'll soon find out, won't we.
Still, even if prof. Rietzner gets this published, it will likely be in a second- or third-tier journal, which means little traction, much less attention.
Does the data go back further than 2020? The reason for asking is that I see the 0 to 14 age group had 10.8% excess mortality in 2020, which at first glance seems high. But we knew in 2020 when the first lockdowns happened and schols remained open (but then we all forgot during 2021 when we had to shut down the schools or go to distance learning to hype the fear just in time for the jab rollout) and we know now (again) that covid was not at all deadly for that age range. So it would be good to know if either (a) 10.8% is within standard deviation (is it statistically significantly different from zero?), or (b) what particular causes of death in 2020 were higher for that age group (perhaps youth suicide as a speculation)?
"omertà" - perfect word choice