Join me on my Quixotic adventure as the IPH seeks to rewrite 'pandemic' history and fails to really answer anything, BUT at least I've got their attention now (and Aavitsland‘s email address)
Omg, they must absolutely hate us. At least, I now know at least one of the 6 numpties who answered "it would have been worse but for the vaccines" in my poll! Next time you email him, please ask about my bridge. Is he interested??
Excuse my ignorance of Norway, but when Aavitsland says "there is a large body of evidence...", is he referring to independent research done in Norway on vaccine efficacy, or, is he relying on the evidence provided by Pfizer and Moderna which gets uncritically recycled by the American CDC (which we recently learned shares the same PR firm as Pfizer [1])?
Perhaps in your next email ask him if it's possible that the reason every single country that vaccinated it's population saw cases explode and excess mortality increase isn't because "omicron was more transmissible" but rather, the vaccine had the same known problem of all previous SARS vaccine attempts - it made the host more susceptible to variants like Omicron. It was the reason we didn't have a working SARS vaccine despite 15 years of trying in the first place. [2]
" I do believe it highly likely that there were instructions from highly-ranked public health officials who told every MD in the country to more or less code everything that even looked like a respiratory disease with R991 (presumed/probable), thus creating the ‘data basis’ for the declaration of the ‘pandemic’ in the first place."
This is the crux of I believe. And I'll expand on it. Governments knowingly conspired to do such with harmonized messaging including the US CDC which fully allows presumed DX - no lab testing needed.
Nov 19, 2022·edited Nov 19, 2022Liked by epimetheus
There is nothing a priori wrong with modelling seasonality via a factor to the transmission rate. However, making the factor a direct function of temperature is kind of a hint that they do not have any data at hand. And how could they have? This is only the second season with omicron, and new subvariants at that. Moreover, viruses seem to have to compete with each other, and influenza or rsv might be coming back with a vengeance.
Here in Germany, there is definitely much more to seasonality than temperature. All the Covid waves (and maybe waves of other respiratory viruses, too) started in the south (Bavaria) and southeast (Saxony), and worked their way to the north and west.
Edit: I wrote the above before scanning the report. They seem to be aware of the difficulties of modelling, and comparison to influenza and rsv is actually in the report. From a modelling perspective, they seem to be doing their best. But as William Briggs never tires to remind us: all models only say what they are told to say. The crucial aspect is model use: do model users know the limitations of models; are they maybe too impressed by the diagrams, the tables, the precision on display; how do model results influence their decisions?
The enlightened scientific community in Norway must be shaking their heads. Why are ALL these alphabet agencies across the world spewing nonsense? Were they ALL bought and paid for?
The yet long term unknown results of these many injections must be an exciting sexual event for these WEF administrators. Since they believe there to be too many people on the planet, it (this continuing injection event), being a human sacrificial death event is of little consequence at best Those who volunteered are to be an early arrival to their funeral is my take.
Omg, they must absolutely hate us. At least, I now know at least one of the 6 numpties who answered "it would have been worse but for the vaccines" in my poll! Next time you email him, please ask about my bridge. Is he interested??
Stephan,
Excuse my ignorance of Norway, but when Aavitsland says "there is a large body of evidence...", is he referring to independent research done in Norway on vaccine efficacy, or, is he relying on the evidence provided by Pfizer and Moderna which gets uncritically recycled by the American CDC (which we recently learned shares the same PR firm as Pfizer [1])?
Perhaps in your next email ask him if it's possible that the reason every single country that vaccinated it's population saw cases explode and excess mortality increase isn't because "omicron was more transmissible" but rather, the vaccine had the same known problem of all previous SARS vaccine attempts - it made the host more susceptible to variants like Omicron. It was the reason we didn't have a working SARS vaccine despite 15 years of trying in the first place. [2]
[1] https://disinformationchronicle.substack.com/p/weber-shandwick-provides-pr-for-moderna
[2] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7094954/
Thanks for what you all are doing.
" I do believe it highly likely that there were instructions from highly-ranked public health officials who told every MD in the country to more or less code everything that even looked like a respiratory disease with R991 (presumed/probable), thus creating the ‘data basis’ for the declaration of the ‘pandemic’ in the first place."
This is the crux of I believe. And I'll expand on it. Governments knowingly conspired to do such with harmonized messaging including the US CDC which fully allows presumed DX - no lab testing needed.
Bravo! Keep holding feet to the fire.
There is nothing a priori wrong with modelling seasonality via a factor to the transmission rate. However, making the factor a direct function of temperature is kind of a hint that they do not have any data at hand. And how could they have? This is only the second season with omicron, and new subvariants at that. Moreover, viruses seem to have to compete with each other, and influenza or rsv might be coming back with a vengeance.
Here in Germany, there is definitely much more to seasonality than temperature. All the Covid waves (and maybe waves of other respiratory viruses, too) started in the south (Bavaria) and southeast (Saxony), and worked their way to the north and west.
Edit: I wrote the above before scanning the report. They seem to be aware of the difficulties of modelling, and comparison to influenza and rsv is actually in the report. From a modelling perspective, they seem to be doing their best. But as William Briggs never tires to remind us: all models only say what they are told to say. The crucial aspect is model use: do model users know the limitations of models; are they maybe too impressed by the diagrams, the tables, the precision on display; how do model results influence their decisions?
Well done for digging this out of the horrendous mess at large in a crazy world.
The enlightened scientific community in Norway must be shaking their heads. Why are ALL these alphabet agencies across the world spewing nonsense? Were they ALL bought and paid for?
The yet long term unknown results of these many injections must be an exciting sexual event for these WEF administrators. Since they believe there to be too many people on the planet, it (this continuing injection event), being a human sacrificial death event is of little consequence at best Those who volunteered are to be an early arrival to their funeral is my take.