The increase in breast cancer may, indeed, be due to the injections, but the other thing to keep in mind is that many cancers (including breast cancer) correlate with obesity. And what did lockdowns do? Oh, yeah... Well. No-body could possibly have predicted that! It's not like anyone was stopping the proles from doing aerobics and weightlifting in their living rooms! And if they were gorging on oreos instead of celery, well, that's on them, innit?
This is an extremely valid point you raise: I've been on the record for about 2 years now stating that this entire shitshow is, in part at least, a lifestyle problem. Confirmed by virtually all agencies in the interim, esp. obesity was a known problem before Covid, and if there's anything to learn from the past two years, I'd argue it's that no-one--not a single politician or 'expert' who's afforded space in the media--is saying so.
It is also a problem for which the individual is solely responsible, and ultimately is the one who can fix, so there's not much political capital to be gained unless the problem can be scapegoated or the semantics played in such a way what is a problem of self-discipline and sense can be made into a wrod-game where the problem as-is, is moved to the descripition of the problem as the real problem.
So, there's no real risk/reward-formula guaranteeing infuence, power and wealth beyond selling various non-sensical magical tokens in the shape of diets, tangentially related medical conditions and such. Case in point: if you're diabetic, who's responisbility is it to check what you eat?
Yours or everyone elses?
This abdication from personal responsibility as something so obvious and self-evident it is almost a biological imperative, to communal non-responsibility where everything is someone else's responsibility is the same psychological problem as it is with substance abuse, but on a civilisational scale.
I fear, as in dread for real, that the solution is the same: cut those loose that cannot or will not accept full responsibility and blame for their own lives, no matter their excuses and rationalisations.
The alternative is a herd of dependent producer-consumers, the aggression of which can be directed as a tool for those controlling stimuli. After all, few things creates stronger bonds between strangers than hating the authority-approved enemy together.
If you want to improve your own health, then by all means take responsibility for it. If you're a policy maker trying to improve the general state of health in your country (e.g. because you'd like to reduce disability spending, or because you'd like to have a sufficient number of healthy men to draft in case your country is invaded by a foreign power), then telling people to take responsibility for their health is laughably inadequate for the task.
You are right on point, how many people die of cancer from the injection is the point. These health officials are not embarrassed, they are realizing they have been an accessory to manslaughter (at the very least). The lack of data is the evidence of their guilt.
I don't know, the entire system depends on resources that are declining in availability. The people who control the flow of money really aren't all that intelligent doubling down on their fascist plans.
Just checked if something can be said about cancer in Germany. But it's always the same problem: we are mostly thorough, but slooow. The central register on krebsdaten.de has a nice database with configurable queries, but data are only available for 1999-2018...
To quote my doctor: "There is no reason not to order a PSA test for men 40+ whenever they do a blood test". It's a very useful early warning for prostate cancer, and related problems with advancing age. This is very controversial here due to feminism. Because of equality, men does not receive regular cancer screens at all, only women do, and then only for cancer of the womb, cervix and breasts. Because feminists are idiots -feminism should be in the DSM-V, and a mental institution, not an academic one.
Covid is gone, basicall. Tracking is being done to keep tabs on Omicron BA.4 and BA.5 ony, but so far so good, not even 200 such cases total since they appeared. Covid deaths are more or less at zero now, and ICU uptake is as of 9/6 four persons total.
The vast majority (80%+) of remaining cases are in nursing homes, care homes and special housing (handicapped, homeless living in whatever the local commune council can be arsed to scrape up, et c - the poor huddled masses so to speak).
Almost all re-infections are among the vaccinated, more than 75% and so are all Omicron-infections and deaths from when Omicron appeared until now. This is presented as a proof that vaccination against Alpha protect against severe Omicron infection - a blatant flat-out lie.
What is most concerining is that parents are now exhibiting exceptiona aversion to all vaccines, including troed and true old one against TBC, tetanus, smallpox, measles, whooping cough, and rubella and polio. This may well lead to a future re-emergence of diseases that has been virtually wiped out here. TBC, polio and measles was until we joined the EU (the only exception being a Rudolf Steiner-community of anthroposophists outside Stockholm, the source of recurring outbreaks of diseases, parasitical infections, and quite a lot of social problems too). Now, thanks to open borders for alomst 30 years we not only have them back but rabies, cholera, typhoid, and parasitical worms attacking the liver and the heart muscle. Yay open borders! Yay free travel without health checks is a right! Yay! F*ck that I say. Papers please or stay out, same as for animals, and same for anyone travelling from here.
When we had compulsory testing and health passes for travel to and from certain areas (not to mention that travellers from many nations rewuired visas or would be stoppec and incarcerated at the border whether they were asylum seekers or tourists), including mandatory shots and prohpylactics (say if going to Vietnam in the seventies), we didn't have these diseases nor the parasites nor the vermin and bugs so common to southern climes.
But I guess noeliberalism does not care for reality. Reality certainly doesn't care for ideology. And the corporatist EU cares ony for power and profit.
Yes, by choosing the most extreme people to be the face of criticism of vaccines, the valid criticisms - such as the rampant US-led programmes re: HPV, the flu, and so on - were obscured, and we may now be facing a sort of backlash to this, meaning that these extremists (the kind that insist sugar is toxic due to the whitening process, or that "keto" is a valid methoed for dieting and so on) may well pull the Overton-window so far the other way we'll again see outbreaks of the old plagues.
It's not only viral diseases that are affected, vaccine-hesitancy and medical skepticism may well lead to bacterial diseases making a comeback, especially if infrastructure start breaking down.
In Stockholm, there's still a burial pit that's condemned due to it still having highly infectious live bacteri from a cholera outbreak more than 150 yeas ago. It's a mass-grave with over a hundred bodies just thrown in and covered in quick-lime, left to its own devices.
Imagine if this would start leaking leachate into sewer or water lines. As any old european city, those systems are a hodge-podge of newer built upon older all the way back to the 14th century.
Well, as a matter of principle, I don't ask about injection status (partially because I don't want to be asked about it), but most people one encounters volunteer that information anyways.
Since you've asked: I know less than a handful of 'unvaccinated' people in my (admittedly self-selected) circles. While anecdotal, everyone is 'fully vaccinated' and 'not-so recently-boosted'. Everyone eventually 'got Covid', i.e., 'tested positive', albeit some 'got Covid' virtually right after (i.e., 2-3 days) their booster injection.
I think Jessica Rose recently pointed out that 'Covid-19' was the no. 1 'adverse event' of injections in VAERS…
Make of that what you will, but all the unvaccinated I know (with perhaps the exception of my aunt on my mother's side--who, after 2 years of not catching the bug, 'got Omicron' in February, but she didn't complain, 'even though' my aunt has two handfuls of chronic diseases and syndromes for decades) who 'got Covid' in the past half-year or so were barely affected, shrugged the sniffles off in 1-2 days, and that was that.
There were quite fewer direct injuries, as opposed to jabs 1+2 (which put some of my colleagues/acquaintances in bed for a week), but still--everyone I know complained that even though they were all boosted, when they 'got Covid', it was 'quite bad' (whatever that means; my theory is that most people are wimps).
As to the VAIDS, well, we'll see, but if personal anecdotes are any guide, more of my family are getting just a bit more sick-ish a bit more often: a slightly more annoying cold here, some skin troubles of my 2yo nephew there, you know…give it some more time…
The increase in breast cancer may, indeed, be due to the injections, but the other thing to keep in mind is that many cancers (including breast cancer) correlate with obesity. And what did lockdowns do? Oh, yeah... Well. No-body could possibly have predicted that! It's not like anyone was stopping the proles from doing aerobics and weightlifting in their living rooms! And if they were gorging on oreos instead of celery, well, that's on them, innit?
This is an extremely valid point you raise: I've been on the record for about 2 years now stating that this entire shitshow is, in part at least, a lifestyle problem. Confirmed by virtually all agencies in the interim, esp. obesity was a known problem before Covid, and if there's anything to learn from the past two years, I'd argue it's that no-one--not a single politician or 'expert' who's afforded space in the media--is saying so.
It is also a problem for which the individual is solely responsible, and ultimately is the one who can fix, so there's not much political capital to be gained unless the problem can be scapegoated or the semantics played in such a way what is a problem of self-discipline and sense can be made into a wrod-game where the problem as-is, is moved to the descripition of the problem as the real problem.
So, there's no real risk/reward-formula guaranteeing infuence, power and wealth beyond selling various non-sensical magical tokens in the shape of diets, tangentially related medical conditions and such. Case in point: if you're diabetic, who's responisbility is it to check what you eat?
Yours or everyone elses?
This abdication from personal responsibility as something so obvious and self-evident it is almost a biological imperative, to communal non-responsibility where everything is someone else's responsibility is the same psychological problem as it is with substance abuse, but on a civilisational scale.
I fear, as in dread for real, that the solution is the same: cut those loose that cannot or will not accept full responsibility and blame for their own lives, no matter their excuses and rationalisations.
The alternative is a herd of dependent producer-consumers, the aggression of which can be directed as a tool for those controlling stimuli. After all, few things creates stronger bonds between strangers than hating the authority-approved enemy together.
If you want to improve your own health, then by all means take responsibility for it. If you're a policy maker trying to improve the general state of health in your country (e.g. because you'd like to reduce disability spending, or because you'd like to have a sufficient number of healthy men to draft in case your country is invaded by a foreign power), then telling people to take responsibility for their health is laughably inadequate for the task.
You are right on point, how many people die of cancer from the injection is the point. These health officials are not embarrassed, they are realizing they have been an accessory to manslaughter (at the very least). The lack of data is the evidence of their guilt.
There will be pawns whose sacrificial offering will light up the night skies. Nothing will fundamentally change, therefore.
I don't know, the entire system depends on resources that are declining in availability. The people who control the flow of money really aren't all that intelligent doubling down on their fascist plans.
That is obvious, it's just that these actions may be totallz unrelated to all matters Covid, epidemiologically speaking.
'Their' main concern is how much longer 'Covid' may continue working as a smoke-screnn for their shenanigans.
Hahahaha! Their concerns are misplaced!
Just checked if something can be said about cancer in Germany. But it's always the same problem: we are mostly thorough, but slooow. The central register on krebsdaten.de has a nice database with configurable queries, but data are only available for 1999-2018...
To quote my doctor: "There is no reason not to order a PSA test for men 40+ whenever they do a blood test". It's a very useful early warning for prostate cancer, and related problems with advancing age. This is very controversial here due to feminism. Because of equality, men does not receive regular cancer screens at all, only women do, and then only for cancer of the womb, cervix and breasts. Because feminists are idiots -feminism should be in the DSM-V, and a mental institution, not an academic one.
Covid is gone, basicall. Tracking is being done to keep tabs on Omicron BA.4 and BA.5 ony, but so far so good, not even 200 such cases total since they appeared. Covid deaths are more or less at zero now, and ICU uptake is as of 9/6 four persons total.
The vast majority (80%+) of remaining cases are in nursing homes, care homes and special housing (handicapped, homeless living in whatever the local commune council can be arsed to scrape up, et c - the poor huddled masses so to speak).
Almost all re-infections are among the vaccinated, more than 75% and so are all Omicron-infections and deaths from when Omicron appeared until now. This is presented as a proof that vaccination against Alpha protect against severe Omicron infection - a blatant flat-out lie.
What is most concerining is that parents are now exhibiting exceptiona aversion to all vaccines, including troed and true old one against TBC, tetanus, smallpox, measles, whooping cough, and rubella and polio. This may well lead to a future re-emergence of diseases that has been virtually wiped out here. TBC, polio and measles was until we joined the EU (the only exception being a Rudolf Steiner-community of anthroposophists outside Stockholm, the source of recurring outbreaks of diseases, parasitical infections, and quite a lot of social problems too). Now, thanks to open borders for alomst 30 years we not only have them back but rabies, cholera, typhoid, and parasitical worms attacking the liver and the heart muscle. Yay open borders! Yay free travel without health checks is a right! Yay! F*ck that I say. Papers please or stay out, same as for animals, and same for anyone travelling from here.
When we had compulsory testing and health passes for travel to and from certain areas (not to mention that travellers from many nations rewuired visas or would be stoppec and incarcerated at the border whether they were asylum seekers or tourists), including mandatory shots and prohpylactics (say if going to Vietnam in the seventies), we didn't have these diseases nor the parasites nor the vermin and bugs so common to southern climes.
But I guess noeliberalism does not care for reality. Reality certainly doesn't care for ideology. And the corporatist EU cares ony for power and profit.
I second your concerns regarding possible return of other diseases due to general vaccine hesitancy.
Same here: leaving aside the (in my opinion valid safety) concerns raised by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., this is very bad and potentially catastropic.
Yes, by choosing the most extreme people to be the face of criticism of vaccines, the valid criticisms - such as the rampant US-led programmes re: HPV, the flu, and so on - were obscured, and we may now be facing a sort of backlash to this, meaning that these extremists (the kind that insist sugar is toxic due to the whitening process, or that "keto" is a valid methoed for dieting and so on) may well pull the Overton-window so far the other way we'll again see outbreaks of the old plagues.
It's not only viral diseases that are affected, vaccine-hesitancy and medical skepticism may well lead to bacterial diseases making a comeback, especially if infrastructure start breaking down.
In Stockholm, there's still a burial pit that's condemned due to it still having highly infectious live bacteri from a cholera outbreak more than 150 yeas ago. It's a mass-grave with over a hundred bodies just thrown in and covered in quick-lime, left to its own devices.
Imagine if this would start leaking leachate into sewer or water lines. As any old european city, those systems are a hodge-podge of newer built upon older all the way back to the 14th century.
Well, as a matter of principle, I don't ask about injection status (partially because I don't want to be asked about it), but most people one encounters volunteer that information anyways.
Since you've asked: I know less than a handful of 'unvaccinated' people in my (admittedly self-selected) circles. While anecdotal, everyone is 'fully vaccinated' and 'not-so recently-boosted'. Everyone eventually 'got Covid', i.e., 'tested positive', albeit some 'got Covid' virtually right after (i.e., 2-3 days) their booster injection.
I think Jessica Rose recently pointed out that 'Covid-19' was the no. 1 'adverse event' of injections in VAERS…
Make of that what you will, but all the unvaccinated I know (with perhaps the exception of my aunt on my mother's side--who, after 2 years of not catching the bug, 'got Omicron' in February, but she didn't complain, 'even though' my aunt has two handfuls of chronic diseases and syndromes for decades) who 'got Covid' in the past half-year or so were barely affected, shrugged the sniffles off in 1-2 days, and that was that.
There were quite fewer direct injuries, as opposed to jabs 1+2 (which put some of my colleagues/acquaintances in bed for a week), but still--everyone I know complained that even though they were all boosted, when they 'got Covid', it was 'quite bad' (whatever that means; my theory is that most people are wimps).
As to the VAIDS, well, we'll see, but if personal anecdotes are any guide, more of my family are getting just a bit more sick-ish a bit more often: a slightly more annoying cold here, some skin troubles of my 2yo nephew there, you know…give it some more time…