It's in the refereed academic literature, hence it's a thing, sayeth Team Science™ while omitting, perhaps out of ignorance, everything that's not anarchist-revolutionary or counter to their believes
No problem finding the editorial on yandex. I find your characterisation of Humboldt to be a bit uncharitable.
Also David Graeber. How did this guy become so influential, relatively speaking? ‚Debt‘ is hilarious but also nonsensical.
Oh, this isn't my characterisation--it's from whoever wrote the entry at the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy!
As to Mr. Graeber, well, what can I say? The one-eyed is king among the blind, I suppose, says all I may add.
No problem finding the editorial on yandex. I find your characterisation of Humboldt to be a bit uncharitable.
Also David Graeber. How did this guy become so influential, relatively speaking? ‚Debt‘ is hilarious but also nonsensical.
Oh, this isn't my characterisation--it's from whoever wrote the entry at the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy!
As to Mr. Graeber, well, what can I say? The one-eyed is king among the blind, I suppose, says all I may add.