Discussion about this post

User's avatar
cm27874's avatar

Thanks for informing us about the situation in Norway. The OOO is a curious incident indeed.

One remark: the two figures (73% of the OOO participants infected) and the RKI figure (70%) can not be compared (apart from the fact that both point to the vaccination being ineffective in terms of prohibiting infections).

The 73% are an estimate of your probability of becoming infected, given

- you are vaccinated

- you are 30-50yo

- you come into contact with the virus (coming from another vaccinated person) and

- the environment is pro-infection (indoors, longer time period, presumably lots of talking, laughing, drinking, maybe singing)

The 70% are the proportion of vaccinated people in a certain population of infected persons with symptoms. They are an estimate of the probability of drawing a vaccinated person when the sample available are all infected 60+ year-old people with symptoms in Germany. That probability depends on the vaccination rate: if the vaccination rate is zero, the probability is zero as well; if the vaccination rate is one; the probability is one as well; the 70% are an estimate corresponding to the current vaccination rate of about 86%. If the estimate is good (which I doubt, due to the RKI's data problems) it means that the vaccination still has some effectiveness against infection with symptoms. A placebo would lead to a probability of around 86% (not considering the placebo effect).

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts