This is done by mandating 'emissions-free' (electric) construction machinery, which makes building anything much more complicated and expensive (but perhaps that's the point)
"This is done by mandating 'emissions-free' (electric) construction machinery, which makes building anything much more complicated and expensive (but perhaps that's the point)"
“Killing the Construction Industry” …and the basic materials industry (Grundstoffindustrie, i.e. BASF etc.) because of extremely high energy costs due to the climate bullshit that cannot be stopped because it is not supposed to be stopped.
--
"For those wondering what will come after the Covid19 pandemic has successfully all but shut down the entire world economy, spreading the worst depression since the 1930s, the leaders of the premier globalization NGO, Davos World Economic Forum, have just unveiled the outlines of what we can expect next. These people have decided to use this [manufactured] crisis as an opportunity...
The word sustainable is the keyword. If we dig deeper it is clear it is code-word for a reorganization of world wealth via means such as punitive carbon taxes that will dramatically reduce air and vehicle travel. The less-developed world will not rise to the developed, rather the other way, the advanced civilizations must go down in their living standards to become 'sustainable.'"
"Socialism is the most advanced and perfected form of slavery. ...
Most people, especially the workers, have always simply not understood what is actually being done under the guise of climate protection.
For example, it is always said rhetorically that trading in emissions rights is a pure market economy because industry can trade its emissions rights on the stock exchange in a similar way to trading shares, but of course that is nonsense, or rather it is deliberate misleading.
In truth, trading in emissions rights is a prime example of an eco-socialist planned economy, because here politicians arbitrarily determine how much private industry is allowed to produce.
And when politicians boast about reducing carbon dioxide emissions by such and such a percentage, it ultimately means nothing other than that production in the private sector is being reduced by precisely this percentage in a completely arbitrary manner.
This is planned economy, nothing else.
In the case of international emission rights trading, Western industrialized countries that have exhausted the emission quotas allocated by the UNO should be able to buy additional emission rights from the Third World.
So the West should buy the right from the Third World to be allowed to produce itself from its own resources, while the Third World is paid not to produce.
What is this but socialist redistribution in its purest form?
If you ask me why climate protection has such a high level of acceptance in society, the main reason is that people haven't figured it out yet, or maybe they're simply not informed about what's behind it.
So-called climate protection is ultimately only about curtailing the alleged wealth of the western states, which is then called sufficiency in the official vocabulary, and then redistributing the remainder internationally.
Of course, the small man always pays the bill, i.e. whose job is at risk, and who has to pay ever higher energy prices, and whose mobility and living situation are increasingly restricted and harassed, and I call that arbitrariness."
It is so sad to hear this news, because it drives a policy of asynchronous constraints/disruption of a network of engineering expertise that has grown over the long term, which can never go well and will leave damage in societies for generations to come. To put it bluntly: this is what is intended.
Sounds like Norway needs a 1776
"This is done by mandating 'emissions-free' (electric) construction machinery, which makes building anything much more complicated and expensive (but perhaps that's the point)"
That's right. Read Stefan Wehmeier's blog "Opium of the people" ( https://opium-des-volkes.blogspot.com/ ) and find out, why.
“Killing the Construction Industry” …and the basic materials industry (Grundstoffindustrie, i.e. BASF etc.) because of extremely high energy costs due to the climate bullshit that cannot be stopped because it is not supposed to be stopped.
--
"For those wondering what will come after the Covid19 pandemic has successfully all but shut down the entire world economy, spreading the worst depression since the 1930s, the leaders of the premier globalization NGO, Davos World Economic Forum, have just unveiled the outlines of what we can expect next. These people have decided to use this [manufactured] crisis as an opportunity...
The word sustainable is the keyword. If we dig deeper it is clear it is code-word for a reorganization of world wealth via means such as punitive carbon taxes that will dramatically reduce air and vehicle travel. The less-developed world will not rise to the developed, rather the other way, the advanced civilizations must go down in their living standards to become 'sustainable.'"
— William Engdahl: Pandemic "Reset" Will Reduce West to Third World Level - https://www.henrymakow.com/2020/07/Engdahl-Pandemic-Reset-Levels-West-With-Third-World.html
---
Torsten Mann explains it his book: Red lies in a green robe: The communist background of the eco-movement
Rote Lügen im grünen Gewand - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hTDYXHHiq34&t=345
"Socialism is the most advanced and perfected form of slavery. ...
Most people, especially the workers, have always simply not understood what is actually being done under the guise of climate protection.
For example, it is always said rhetorically that trading in emissions rights is a pure market economy because industry can trade its emissions rights on the stock exchange in a similar way to trading shares, but of course that is nonsense, or rather it is deliberate misleading.
In truth, trading in emissions rights is a prime example of an eco-socialist planned economy, because here politicians arbitrarily determine how much private industry is allowed to produce.
And when politicians boast about reducing carbon dioxide emissions by such and such a percentage, it ultimately means nothing other than that production in the private sector is being reduced by precisely this percentage in a completely arbitrary manner.
This is planned economy, nothing else.
In the case of international emission rights trading, Western industrialized countries that have exhausted the emission quotas allocated by the UNO should be able to buy additional emission rights from the Third World.
So the West should buy the right from the Third World to be allowed to produce itself from its own resources, while the Third World is paid not to produce.
What is this but socialist redistribution in its purest form?
If you ask me why climate protection has such a high level of acceptance in society, the main reason is that people haven't figured it out yet, or maybe they're simply not informed about what's behind it.
So-called climate protection is ultimately only about curtailing the alleged wealth of the western states, which is then called sufficiency in the official vocabulary, and then redistributing the remainder internationally.
Of course, the small man always pays the bill, i.e. whose job is at risk, and who has to pay ever higher energy prices, and whose mobility and living situation are increasingly restricted and harassed, and I call that arbitrariness."
Translated with Google Translate
It is so sad to hear this news, because it drives a policy of asynchronous constraints/disruption of a network of engineering expertise that has grown over the long term, which can never go well and will leave damage in societies for generations to come. To put it bluntly: this is what is intended.
You know, there's a way to build emissions-free houses.
Log houses. Lafteverk in Norwegian. Or Blockbau in German.
I honestly wonder why - in Norway and Sweden of all places - this isn't extolled as the most climate-virtuous way of building.