Believe it or not, if you ever wondered 'bout that, the Science™ has the answer: 'high willingness among recent male refugees…whereas whereas resident women exhibit significantly lower openness'
Did the authors, at any point in the paper, research if the men had a permanent residence permit (which would be granted after marriage to a German woman)?
First they used my tax money to feed the incoming men. Now they are using my tax money to investigate why German women won't marry these men. In the future they will use my tax money to subsidize marriages between German women and foreign men.
The real problem that they are missing is that the new male arrivals are, in fact, lower status than native male population however deficient the native males may be as a group. The Syrian and Afghan men are trying to marry up. That doesn’t work for men. Basic Biology and Basic Social Behavior. Wonder if I can get paid by this worthless PhD factory.
That's also the main issue with many of the less-recent arrivals: those who could leave earlier tend to be of higher educational attainment and status, which of course means that the above notions don't apply to, say, Alevite doctors from what used to be Syria who came to East Germany in the late 1980s, but then again, even knowing about these notions disqualifies you from participation in these circles.
Gee, who could've thought about theory (the Kalergi plan) and practice not aligning in, well reality?
There's only one reason why higher-status women will entertain these thoughts, and I spelled them out above: having been conquered, they will do so; as long as this isn't the case, it won't happen. That's the proverbial lesson of history.
Also, I suppose we get to share that prize…(facepalm)
The meme-truth of "10% of the men get to be with 90% of the women" is maybe off a bit on the actual numbers, but the core truth is true, sadly.
Race/Kultur is just part of that; like it or not but women find certain hard-wired things attractive, and so does men - and men also have this idea that there are women that are for having sex with, and that there are women you might marry, and that those two are not the same.
While I don't want to romanticise the Greek or Babylonian (I think it was?) systems of prostitution, it did solve the problem for society as a whole.
We're moving, ideas-wise, towards what Zamjatin described in 'We': sex-tombola. Everybody has exactly as much intercourse as anyone else, partner decided by lottery, and pregnancy dictated by a mathematical eugenical and economical formula - after all, it's what's fair and equitable and best for the collective...
I'll share that medal - as long as it's not American "chocolate".
It's more like a Pareto-esque 80:20 split, it would seem.
As to the other parts, it's kinda hard to argue that enforced monogamy based on certain attainment, educational or professional, made 'the West'; hilariously, scholars working on the European Marriage Pattern made that point, like, 50 years ago (which means it's kinda memory-holed these days).
Did the authors, at any point in the paper, research if the men had a permanent residence permit (which would be granted after marriage to a German woman)?
First they used my tax money to feed the incoming men. Now they are using my tax money to investigate why German women won't marry these men. In the future they will use my tax money to subsidize marriages between German women and foreign men.
Not that I've noticed, but then again, the path you're outlining seems very much in line with recent policy in Germany.
The real problem that they are missing is that the new male arrivals are, in fact, lower status than native male population however deficient the native males may be as a group. The Syrian and Afghan men are trying to marry up. That doesn’t work for men. Basic Biology and Basic Social Behavior. Wonder if I can get paid by this worthless PhD factory.
That's also the main issue with many of the less-recent arrivals: those who could leave earlier tend to be of higher educational attainment and status, which of course means that the above notions don't apply to, say, Alevite doctors from what used to be Syria who came to East Germany in the late 1980s, but then again, even knowing about these notions disqualifies you from participation in these circles.
In other words:
Syrian/Afghan men will have sex with German women, but will not form stable families with them.
And German women do not want to have families with Syrian/Afghan men.
Oh dear, the Coudenhove-Kalergi plan not working if people can make their own choices?
I'll take my Nobel in Sociology in the form of a chocolate-medal, please.
Gee, who could've thought about theory (the Kalergi plan) and practice not aligning in, well reality?
There's only one reason why higher-status women will entertain these thoughts, and I spelled them out above: having been conquered, they will do so; as long as this isn't the case, it won't happen. That's the proverbial lesson of history.
Also, I suppose we get to share that prize…(facepalm)
The meme-truth of "10% of the men get to be with 90% of the women" is maybe off a bit on the actual numbers, but the core truth is true, sadly.
Race/Kultur is just part of that; like it or not but women find certain hard-wired things attractive, and so does men - and men also have this idea that there are women that are for having sex with, and that there are women you might marry, and that those two are not the same.
While I don't want to romanticise the Greek or Babylonian (I think it was?) systems of prostitution, it did solve the problem for society as a whole.
We're moving, ideas-wise, towards what Zamjatin described in 'We': sex-tombola. Everybody has exactly as much intercourse as anyone else, partner decided by lottery, and pregnancy dictated by a mathematical eugenical and economical formula - after all, it's what's fair and equitable and best for the collective...
I'll share that medal - as long as it's not American "chocolate".
It's more like a Pareto-esque 80:20 split, it would seem.
As to the other parts, it's kinda hard to argue that enforced monogamy based on certain attainment, educational or professional, made 'the West'; hilariously, scholars working on the European Marriage Pattern made that point, like, 50 years ago (which means it's kinda memory-holed these days).