'A recent study based on data from the Trøndelag Health Survey (HUNT) shows that the virus also leaves invisible traces [orig. usynlige spor] in the general population.' ∽ NRK journo™ Jan-Erik Wilthil
Since COVID vaccines are so effective, perhaps they can show the difference between those who had taken the jab and those who had not. Those who took the jab would naturally have lower rates of heart disease. ;-)
We now know™ that you think you may be fine--but in a sample of 98.9% vaxxed study participants, we just saw that you're not healthy, that is, until and unless you get a GP telling you, the Science™ signing off on it, and then, a bit later, learning™, through careful observations, of 'subclinical' cardiovascular issues.
If this was a scientific study, the authors would have done these tests with a control group. I suspect eight mice or the like were too expensive, animal cruelty, or whatever.
I wonder what the researchers would make of people such as myself?
No mRNA-injection. Also, no Covid - I don't have antibodies for it. Paid for the bloodwork out of my own pocket because Folkhälsomyndiheten deemed antibody-testing unnecessary when they realised the cost of doing a test that works instead of the cheapo PCR-tests.
And as we know from our studies of organisational theory and practice, the important thing for a bureaucracy is that an action "evented", not anything else: "We responded so now you can't criticise us!"
Who was it that did PCR-tests on Coca Cola annd inanimate objects and got positives?
Fauci is on video saying CT values of 37 are just "noise" and meaningless. I think he said up to mid 20's being optimum. This report considered 35-37 as being low. UK were testing at CT value of 45, I saw standard op procedures for labs. Any experienced technician using this apparatus would know about false positives with those cycles. It was all BS before jabs and death and destruction after. The most reported adverse event in the european drugs database after a covid jab was.....drumroll ........getting ill with all the "covid" symptoms although unclear if all got tested to "prove" it. Sonia Elijah's substack has the video on it. Dr Charles Hoff tested his patients after jabs who were suffering and their troponim levels were severely elevated.
Since COVID vaccines are so effective, perhaps they can show the difference between those who had taken the jab and those who had not. Those who took the jab would naturally have lower rates of heart disease. ;-)
Ah, that's not how the Science™ works™, you know.
We now know™ that you think you may be fine--but in a sample of 98.9% vaxxed study participants, we just saw that you're not healthy, that is, until and unless you get a GP telling you, the Science™ signing off on it, and then, a bit later, learning™, through careful observations, of 'subclinical' cardiovascular issues.
If this was a scientific study, the authors would have done these tests with a control group. I suspect eight mice or the like were too expensive, animal cruelty, or whatever.
Yes, those mice are becoming prohibitively expensive. :-D
And getting them from God-knows-where produces CO2 emissions, too.
Yes, they are climate altering animals. Tiny farts but super potent. LOL.
Oh, you know, these mice may have little hearts, but they add big farts. Or whatever.
"Corona Infection"
What is that supposed to be?
THERE IS NO VIRUS!!!
In a, and I shall remind everybody every time, in a 98.9% vaxxed study population.
I wonder what the researchers would make of people such as myself?
No mRNA-injection. Also, no Covid - I don't have antibodies for it. Paid for the bloodwork out of my own pocket because Folkhälsomyndiheten deemed antibody-testing unnecessary when they realised the cost of doing a test that works instead of the cheapo PCR-tests.
And as we know from our studies of organisational theory and practice, the important thing for a bureaucracy is that an action "evented", not anything else: "We responded so now you can't criticise us!"
Who was it that did PCR-tests on Coca Cola annd inanimate objects and got positives?
Exactly.
Re your concluding q: that would be former Tanzanijan president Magafuli (as mentioned in the above piece).
Fauci is on video saying CT values of 37 are just "noise" and meaningless. I think he said up to mid 20's being optimum. This report considered 35-37 as being low. UK were testing at CT value of 45, I saw standard op procedures for labs. Any experienced technician using this apparatus would know about false positives with those cycles. It was all BS before jabs and death and destruction after. The most reported adverse event in the european drugs database after a covid jab was.....drumroll ........getting ill with all the "covid" symptoms although unclear if all got tested to "prove" it. Sonia Elijah's substack has the video on it. Dr Charles Hoff tested his patients after jabs who were suffering and their troponim levels were severely elevated.