Someone wasn't ready for Multipolar to go public, which means someone did their job right re: the FOIA:ed information - you're not supposed to inform politicos about legal information requests, who made or for what purpose. Here, it would be illegal for a civil servant clerk to even ask who you are and for what you want the public information - well, apart from where the information is to be sent of course; informing higher ups that such-and-such asked for X or Y is illegal, and it is illegal for said higher ups to try and find out.
Hence the initial truthful reporting followed by re-writes when the reaction from the higher ups comes down the pipe.
Which is stupid, of course. Now, it's not just the Covid-lies, it's politicos and clerks interfering with news reporting.
Heh, initially read it as "infernal minutes" in the opening paragraphs. My subconscious is trying to say something, maybe.
As to the 'being ready' part, well, Multipolar only obtained these files (from 2020-21, mind you, i.e., I expect those from 2022-24 to be even more explosive in terms of internal deliberations vs. public policy) after the Administrative Court didn't throw out the case.
As to your consideration of innsynsbejæring (technically a kind of FOIA request), well, civil servants can claim exceptions and deny access for whatever reason, and that is a decision that's effectively impossible to appeal.
I do think that your assessment about interventions from higher in the food chain is correct, as well as your consideration of this being stupid. It's like a never-ending, self-reinforcing feedback loop of agit-prop being reported on, legacy media, politicos decrying 'misinformation', which begs more censorship plus more agit-prop, and so on.
As to your subconsicous, well, these are actors from hell, I have no doubts about it.
Someone wasn't ready for Multipolar to go public, which means someone did their job right re: the FOIA:ed information - you're not supposed to inform politicos about legal information requests, who made or for what purpose. Here, it would be illegal for a civil servant clerk to even ask who you are and for what you want the public information - well, apart from where the information is to be sent of course; informing higher ups that such-and-such asked for X or Y is illegal, and it is illegal for said higher ups to try and find out.
Hence the initial truthful reporting followed by re-writes when the reaction from the higher ups comes down the pipe.
Which is stupid, of course. Now, it's not just the Covid-lies, it's politicos and clerks interfering with news reporting.
Heh, initially read it as "infernal minutes" in the opening paragraphs. My subconscious is trying to say something, maybe.
As to the 'being ready' part, well, Multipolar only obtained these files (from 2020-21, mind you, i.e., I expect those from 2022-24 to be even more explosive in terms of internal deliberations vs. public policy) after the Administrative Court didn't throw out the case.
As to your consideration of innsynsbejæring (technically a kind of FOIA request), well, civil servants can claim exceptions and deny access for whatever reason, and that is a decision that's effectively impossible to appeal.
I do think that your assessment about interventions from higher in the food chain is correct, as well as your consideration of this being stupid. It's like a never-ending, self-reinforcing feedback loop of agit-prop being reported on, legacy media, politicos decrying 'misinformation', which begs more censorship plus more agit-prop, and so on.
As to your subconsicous, well, these are actors from hell, I have no doubts about it.