Climate cultists should move north of the Arctic circle and try their hand at farming, or at least move to 1000ft above sea level, away from large bodies of water.
Bonus points if they move to an area with moraine soil.
Hence the allusion to what Marie Antoinette (allegedly) said.
The cognitive dissonance is striking, isn't it?
Apart from your (well-taken) comment w/respect to the Arctic Circle--I live at 61 degrees North--this is another case of the abject failure of mainstream media reporting: last month, it was all 'doom & gloom', now it's better harvests.
My 4th-grader child doesn't write such incoherent texts. Just sayin'…
Reminds me of the semi-hysterical reports of archeologists finding human settlements which are revealed by the melting ice.
It never seems to occur to the reporters that these finds indicate that temperatures must have been higher in the past or the settlements would not have existed at all.
A lady at work who is reasonably bright commented after a warm day in spring here the other day, that surely this was evidence of «climate change». Really? I thought such variable Weather was just the nature of spring. Some days are nice and summer-like, some are colder… but no, for this person this was hard evidence of climate change! This shows what we are up against. People see what they need to see, to fill in the gaps of the narrative they are being told. Because the narrative can’t be wrong, can it?
Better harvests? Oh, what a scourge of humanity!
Climate cultists should move north of the Arctic circle and try their hand at farming, or at least move to 1000ft above sea level, away from large bodies of water.
Bonus points if they move to an area with moraine soil.
Hence the allusion to what Marie Antoinette (allegedly) said.
The cognitive dissonance is striking, isn't it?
Apart from your (well-taken) comment w/respect to the Arctic Circle--I live at 61 degrees North--this is another case of the abject failure of mainstream media reporting: last month, it was all 'doom & gloom', now it's better harvests.
My 4th-grader child doesn't write such incoherent texts. Just sayin'…
Reminds me of the semi-hysterical reports of archeologists finding human settlements which are revealed by the melting ice.
It never seems to occur to the reporters that these finds indicate that temperatures must have been higher in the past or the settlements would not have existed at all.
One could be forgiven for 'thinking' that, eh?
https://fackel.substack.com/p/where-once-glaciers-rested-archaeologists
Nicely done. :)
That was an easy one, but then again, it's all so weird now…
A lady at work who is reasonably bright commented after a warm day in spring here the other day, that surely this was evidence of «climate change». Really? I thought such variable Weather was just the nature of spring. Some days are nice and summer-like, some are colder… but no, for this person this was hard evidence of climate change! This shows what we are up against. People see what they need to see, to fill in the gaps of the narrative they are being told. Because the narrative can’t be wrong, can it?