Italian Alt-Media Reveals Public Health Authorities Knew About Vaxx Injuries from the Get-Go, Chose to 'not react in order to survive'

So, let's see the evidence presented and check out what is happening, shall we? Spoiler alert: reports of the 'early' demise of 'the narrative' are certainly overblown

And now this happened: Italian alt-media ‘investigative’ outlet ‘Fuori dal coro’ (something like ‘outside the choir’ or ‘from the margins’) details the shenanigans of public health officialdom and politicians. Sadly, there is nothing new under the sun.

What’s Happening in Italy?

About a month ago, the ‘investigative’ show by Mario Giordano, which is hosted by Rete 4 (which, in turn, belongs to the MediaForEurope group once founded by none other than former PM Berlusconi) aired a segment on Covid vaccine-associated injuries.

Entitled, ‘The Secret Vaccine Files: How They Covered Up the Truth’ (I documenti segreti sui vaccini: così hanno taciuto la verità, first aired on 14 March), Giordano presents documents showing that, as early as January 2021, there were first reports of ‘vaccinated’ individuals who did not develop non-neutralising antibodies.

By March 2021, an email was sent directly to the Italian Medicines Agency (or AIFA) about the lack of effectiveness of the Pfizer vaccine. In the shown document, an AIFA official himself is alleged to have spoken of ‘vaccination failure’, as reported by Giordano on 14 March. Yet, public health authorities deliberately stuck to the narrative of the ‘safe and effective’ injections; politicians continued to claim that the Covid injections prevented infections and finally imposed compulsory vaccination for workers and people aged 50 and over.

This is hardly known, but Italy was the first country to do so in a way that was both earlier than Austro-Covidistan (see here) and less absurd: Vienna sought to apply the jack-boot to everyone, irrespective of prior infection, age, or the like; by contrast, the Italian gov’t was a bit less deranged. A consolation prize, at best.

In both cases, the one unifying factor was that public health (sic) authorities had always been aware that the experimental injections had never been tested on old and frail people and that their administration was thus highly risky. It’s in the manufacturers’ own files that said medicinal regulatory bodies used to grant ‘emergency use authorisation’ for the administration of these biological products.

‘Bombshell’, Claims Alt-Media Outlet Report24

This is how Report24 is reporting on the matter (my translation and emphases):

AIFA cared shockingly little about vaccine safety. In a published email of 12 January 2021, it already said that the VigiCovid vaccine injury surveillance programme should not be considered ‘if we want to survive, we must learn not to react’.

At the end of March 2023, it has now come to light that the then head of AIFA, Nicola Magrini, deliberately put the continuation of vaccination campaigns above the safety of citizens: In an email dated 15 March 2021, he stated bluntly that far too much attention was being paid to side effects as this would kill the vaccine. In doing so, he denied any causal link between the numerous adverse events discussed and the Covid injections, although quite a few reports showed, for example, clusters of cardiovascular complications in those injected with AstraZeneca and an increased risk for vaccinated people who had previously contracted Covid. Magrini did not care that AIFA employees were puzzled over how vaccines could ‘cause so much harm’; for him, the only thing that obviously mattered was that as many vaccine doses as possible were distributed among the people. [pro tip: if you’re a ‘public health specialist’ working for a public health authority, you cannot be ‘puzzled’ by the lack of injection safety harm; all you should do is take the manufacturer to task court‚ failure to do so speaks volumes about the reliability of the regulatory bodies]

Not surprisingly, although increased cardiovascular mortality among vaccinated people had been known internally as a ‘serious problem’ and had been actively discussed, it was not mentioned in the next official report on vaccine safety. And what's more: a document published in ‘Fuori dal coro’ shows that the draft report still contained this sentence: ‘The limitation of this assessment lies in the possible under-reporting of fatalities.’ In the final version of document that was ultimately published, there was no longer any mention of this.

Finally, in the show of 21 March 2023, it was also revealed that people who died after the Covid injections were declared as Corona-associated dead—even without a positive test. A grieving daughter described the horrific case of her father, who died just 72 hours after his second injection (which she had refused) and was recorded as having died from Covid-19 despite several negative PCR tests. Increased mortality among the newly vaccinated could thus be easily covered up and used instead to fuel the virus panic, which was subsequently used to increase citizens' willingness to take the risky shots.

On 11 April, ‘Fuori dal coro’ revealed that AIFA head Magrini actively put a stop to investigations into deaths directly after vaccination. The TV program cited the case of a soldier, Stefano Paternò from Sicily, who died in his sleep one day after his AstraZeneca shot on 8 March 2021, as well as four other people who lost their lives shortly after their vaccination, presumably also ‘with’ AstraZeneca. Autopsies should have been performed on them, the results of which should then have been sighted by AIFA. However, Magrini, who also publicly stubbornly insisted on the safety of the vector vaccine, intervened and blocked the relevant procedures.

While it sounds very malignant (and I consider it to be), this is nothing new or different: remember, at around the same time, there were two Austrian nurses who died after receiving the AstraZeneca shots. This was reported, briefly, and then the entire affaire was memory-holed as Austria morphed into Covidistan. This was then picked up by, among others, Denmark’s Serum Institute and Norway’s Institute of Public Health in spring 2021 whose chief officials removed the AZ jabs from their 'injection programs’. To this day, the Norwegians claim that this move was a clear indicator showing how ‘well the system works’.

Italian officials, as ‘revealed’ by ‘Fuori dal coro’ on 11 April on Twitter, paint a very different picture: while autopsies are, of course, essential to assess whether and how any biological-pharmaceutical product contributed to or caused death, documents by AIFA demonstrate that public health (ahem) authorities already knew about it at the time.

Moreover, documents also show that AstraZeneca put pressure on AIFA not to block the vaccine despite the known side effects. In fact, Italy was one of the last countries to respond to the obvious dangers of vector vaccination after several deaths. Deaths like that of Stefano Paternò, who according to a court ruling was proven to have died from the AstraZeneca vaccine, could have been easily prevented given the early doubts about its efficacy and safety.

Bottom Li(e)s

Report24 then moves on to ask, ‘when will evidence of these shenanigans come to light in Germany and Austria?’

The documents disclosed by ‘Fuori dal coro’ are unlikely to be invalidated. The machinations of the Italian Medicines Agency have been exposed. The fact that this proverbial bombshell is hardly reported in [Austria or Germany] is hardly surprising, because critical information that was available so early in Italy must have been very well known here, too. It will probably only be a matter of time before evidence comes to light in more and more countries proving the serious extent to which politics and authorities not only put the health of their citizens at risk, but also permanently damaged it.

Oh, my, dear journalists over at Report24: what are you doing? There is already so much evidence, including the above-cited admission by Danish and Norwegian public health officials who elected to discontinue the AstraZeneca adenoviral vector injections, thereby paving the way for BioNTech/Pfizer’s and Moderna’s dominance.

If this would be a perfect world, it would certainly be helpful to approach the European Court of Justice with this, as the (alleged) criminals behind this racketeering operation are in high EU places, including, but belonging not exclusively to, the EU Commission, the European Medicines Agency, and ‘only’ subsidiarily to the various EU/EEC countries. The fish, as far as proverbs go, begin to smell from its head.

At this point, don’t fall for the ‘bombshell’ reports. It’s stale news in old wineskins, at best.

Moreover, check out carefully what is happening here: our judicial system and constitutions are erased before our eyes as ‘even’ alt-media outlets claim that what is happening is somehow ‘normal’, to be followed by the initiation of criminal proceedings.

Far from it, my dear readers, what we’re observing here is the inversion of how the Western criminal justice aspired to be working for millennia: ‘innocent until proven guilty’—in dubio pro reo—used to be the maxim; this was also the case in regulatory affairs: manufacturers of whatever product had to prove their products wouldn’t be harmful.

This world is no longer in existence. Now, consumers or ‘vaccinees’ must provide this kind of evidence, thereby, in effect, inverting (perverting) the justice system.

Don’t get me wrong, I’d very much favour seeing ‘the system’ work, i.e., those people like the AIFA chief hauled in front of a judge. If history is any guide, a country like Italy is, to me, the more likely place for such proceedings to commence (here’s looking at you, mani pulite).

The more ‘advanced’ Northern countries will not do that, but perhaps the Southerners will.

In closing, I’ll leave you with a classical Hegelian kind of reasoning:

• Hypothesis: Italy—southern—Europe isn’t ‘backward’, it’s actually decades ahead of the north-western edges of the Old World: politically speaking (to say nothing about cuisine, design, and the like). When the mani pulite movement—initiated by a lone, brave public prosecutor in Milan—kicked off, it swept away the outer crust of Italy’s corrupt post-1945 political system, thereby paving the way for Mr. Berlusconi and other ‘right-wing populists’.

• Antithesis: the Northern countries took these events to be prima facie evidence of ‘the South’s’ backwardness, even though the former’s politics was (is) about as corrupt as anyone else’s (here’s looking at you, Dr. Schäuble), no effort to clean up Northern politics was undertaken, not even in the most perfunctory way. There is, perhaps, no better example than German so-called ‘re-unification’, which could have triggered a constitutional convention, but the Kohl gov’t adamantly refused to countenance it; today, even mentioning anything like it will invite allegations of ‘right-wing extremism’.

• Synthesis: change is coming before too long. The idiosyncrasies of not engaging in serious reforms will become too many before too long. That said, there is the option that the creeping destruction of both European peoples and their national states is precisely this kind of ‘reform’, and I do think that ‘even’ well-informed people such as Pepe Escobar are, slowly catching on to what is happening in ‘the West’ (see here for his recent piece indicating the likeness of the present moment with 1848, something I’ve written about as early as autumn 2021). As much as I dislike to entertain that kind of thought, it begs consideration; remember, the 1848 Revolutions were followed by, e.g., dictatorship and the restoration of the French empire by Louis Bonaparte while, east of the Rhine, there was the restoration of censorship, the imposition of what, for lack of a better term, might be called ‘military dictatorships’. Yet, the 1850s and 1860s were a period of tremendous economic growth, and while I don’t think that history is repeating itself, it might well be that the imposition of 'the Great Reset’ will have comparable consequences.

Finally, esp. those readers who are in (from) Italy, what do you make of this?