Discussion about this post

User's avatar
InfoHog's avatar

As usual, it's also (strategic) projection. Who is saying these things? People who are either turning things more into a world of historic people who they deem to be the model of "extreme right", or those following in goose step.

Expand full comment
Rikard's avatar

One of the few good things with Sweden's tendency to only have one public truth at a time: anyone having a differing opinion to today's truth is used to being smeared and labelled "right-wing extremist".

I still grin when jewish comedian Aron Flam wrote a book about the Socialist Democratic party's deep and intimate collusion with the NSDAP, and was labelled (drum-roll) a nazi by some media.

See, that's been the go-to here since the early 1990s, when accusing someone of being "commie-lackey/USfascist-lackey" went out of fashion, to call someone - anyone - opposing whatever for being racist and if that doesn't work, nazi.

My advice is, go on the offence whenever accused. Don't ask for clarification, definition or anything like that. Instead, attack by saying "If opposing [detestable custom, religious mandate, ruinous expenditure, other publicly reviled thing] makes me racist, then I'll happily accept the accusation as long as I can try and stop [aforementioned] - why do you and your ilk always support [aforementioned]? Why do you hate [victims of aforementioned]? Are you [perpetrator of aforementioned]?"

Adapt the offensive model as needed within context and remember no conflict is won by accepting the enemy's definitions, by letting the enemy set the pace or by going on the defensive.

Expand full comment
8 more comments...

No posts