Good vs. Bad Deportations, German Style

As German politicos and journos 'discuss' these matters, the discrepancy between reality and whatever these people inhabit becomes obvious: how much longer can this go on?

The pathetically delusional state of what passes for ‘politics’ in Europe is stunning: on the one hand, loads of ‘scandals™’ seem to be irrelevant for anyone’s ‘careers™’ while, even the simplest ‘questions™’ by the one (of course illoyal) ‘opposition™’ are brushed aside with allusions to the Nazi era.

Today, we’ll briefly look at ‘Germany™’, once more, because it is such an apt description of the basket case most European countries find themselves in.

And, lest anyone of my US-based readers expect an anti-American diatribe at this point, well, this will have to do: the basket case was provided by the US, true enough, for there weren’t too many things left standing in 1945. The ‘filling’ of said basket case, though, is of European making, and the near-total depravity of what ‘we’ Europeans put on display in these ‘career politicos™’ and ‘mainstream journos™’ is both pathetically absurd and the result of decades of foreign rule. (Mind you, I’m not claiming it would be ‘better’ or even very ‘different’ if Europeans were ruling their own countries.)

As always, translation of non-English content by me, as are the emphases.

German Police Union: ‘Mass deportations take 80 years’

Last autumn, interestingly just before the infamous ‘Wannsee 2.0’ meeting took place, German Police Union officials took the near-famous ‘efficiency’ of everything ‘made in Germany’ to task.

Yes, Chancellor Olaf Scholz and Interior Minister Nancy Faeser (both SPD) claimed that it would be time to be ‘tough’ and ‘strongly favour’ increased deportations of criminal foreign nationals and those who are denied asylum.

Writing for Focus Online, chief correspondent Göran Schattauer commented on these ‘plans™’ in the following way:

A closer look reveals that Faeser’s grandly announced plan is largely a pipe dream. The Federal Ministry of the Interior’s draft bill states that the number of deportations could only increase by around 5% (600 cases) as a result of the new legislative package, i.e., it would hardly be noticeable.

Interestingly, some legacy media outlets have criticised the PR stunt and decried the government’s spin. Yet, none other than the Police Union came out, too, and here’s what their Rainer Wendt, chairman of the national union syndicate of police officers had to say:

People are really fed up with being led around by the nose like this, the government really shouldn’t be surprised about their plummeting poll numbers. Any child who has mastered basic arithmetic will recognise the government’s deception, especially Chancellor Scholz, who is trying to sell these plans as a turnaround on asylum with pithy words.

Referring to the above-related ‘changes™’ to deportation practices, Wendt added:

It would take more than 80 years to deport around 50,000 people who are required to leave the country, and millions would have arrived here in that time.

Ms. Faeser is full of [shit] saying that she would ensure that more people who are obliged to leave the country would be deported, but that's nonsense. Ms. Faeser is simply not responsible for deportations and she stubbornly refuses to take responsibility in this area. We have always demanded that the federal police be given their own authority for deportations, including the operation of their own deportation centres, but Ms. Faeser has done nothing.

Two things before we move on: first, there are very good reasons why federal police in Germany have as little such powers as possible. It has to do with the Second World War and mass deportations to concentration camps ‘in the east’ and the annihilation of millions of people.

One would consider that changing that kind of legislative and procedural framework would be discussed in these terms, esp. given its meaning in German history. Instead, these notions have become a tool for politicking and voter deception.

One last quote from Mr. Wendt to drive home this point:

‘It is even more important to ensure order at the borders and not simply grant every illegal immigrant who can say ‘asylum’ the right to stay in our country for years, including all the social benefits that will soon overwhelm our systems.’

Anyone arriving from a safe country should not be distributed among federal states and municipalities, but must wait in reception centres at the border for a legally binding decision [oh, look, detention centres or camps at the borders].

‘Anyone whose right to asylum is not recognised must leave the country immediately, which would be the right signal to the countries of origin. And those who don’t have identity papers are not allowed to enter the country anyway, that must be the top priority so that we can finally stop making the German state a laughing stock in the world…’ [did you notice how the police unionist is far more of a ‘right-winger’ than even Mr. Trump?]

‘Every day our country is damaged more and our future is made even more difficult. Our social systems will collapse if things continue like this [if the gov’t does this knowingly, are they still ‘our’ gov’t?]. And society will be further divided and the extreme political fringes strengthened, for which the government is responsible. And that must not be the future of our country.

These words were said, and ‘printed’, well over half a year ago on 26 Oct. 2023. Of course, the government was talking about ‘bad™’ deportations—yet, there are also ‘good™’ ones, isn’t it?

Opposition Demands to ‘Send Ukrainians Back’

Fast-forward to today, more pressure on whatever remains of the rule of law comes from Germany’s mainstream centre-right opposition (on the federal level). As reported by Die Welt on 23 June 2024, here goes:

The CSU in the Bundestag is calling for war refugees from Ukraine to be sent back to their home country if they do not take up work in Germany. ‘The principle must now apply more than two years after the start of the war: get a job in Germany or return to safe areas in western Ukraine’, said CSU regional group leader Alexander Dobrindt…

The SPD and the Greens sharply criticised the demand.

SPD parliamentary group deputy Dirk Wiese told [Die Welt] that Russian President Vladimir Putin was repeatedly bombing targets throughout Ukraine. ‘Dobrindt now wants to send women and children back there who may have already lost their fathers on the front line. The CSU should be ashamed of such demands and remove the C for Christian from its name once and for all.’

Of course, no mention of the repeat bombing of Russian children by Ukrainian forces, often carried out with assistance from US/NATO personnel, remains unmentioned.

Green Party leader Omid Nouripour said: ‘The insinuation that Ukrainians are coming to us because of the citizens’ allowance [orig. Bürgergeld, a kind of dole] fails to recognise the horror of Putin’s war.’ He also rejected suggestions from the CDU/CSU that Ukrainians should not be granted citizens’ allowance benefits immediately, but should first be referred to the regular asylum procedure [why do we have such procedures?]. ‘Of course we need to get Ukrainians into the job market even faster. But new legal hurdles, as the CDU wants, won’t help, they will do harm.’

Dobrindt said that the citizens' allowance was intended as quick help at the beginning of the Russian war of aggression against Ukraine, but had long since become a brake on labour market participation. It was keeping too many people from Ukraine on welfare. ‘We need stronger obligations for asylum seekers when it comes to taking up work. There must be an offer of work, and this must be part of an integration service.’

If we now combine the two above snippets, we realise that whatever ‘the Germans™’ are saying will probably be unworkable in practice, a smoke-screen to deceive citizens, or both. My money is on the third item here.

Bottom Lines

From where I sit, it would appear that Ukrainian refugees are the 1980s-era ‘welfare queens’ now. It also means that this fake debate obscures the facts that the borders are still wide open, that hundreds of thousands of migrants continue to arrive, and, if my experience in my neck of woods is any guide, once more than basic language skills are acquired, most Ukrainians go to work.

Contacts in Austria furthermore suggest that a vast majority of those refugees asylum-seekers are illiterate (I heard shares as high as 70-75%). No chance you could teach them the language if they can’t even recognise letters. Good luck teaching ‘them’ appropriate behaviour, our ‘values™’, or that groping in public swimming pools is forbidden. I doubt that this is much different in Germany.

Speaking of Germany, we now see evidence of an increasingly advanced discrepancy between that which is observed and that which is said in response. There’s perhaps no better example than the faux ‘debate’ so marvellously encapsulated in Matt Walsh’s ‘What is a Woman?’, which has arrived in Germany in full force. More on this here:

Footnote: German Gov't Answers Matt Walsh's Question, 'What is a Woman?'

Instead of literally any kind of conversation, this is the level of discourse among ‘elected™’ politicos. In the linked video (German ‘only’), a scene from the Bavarian state parliament is shown with an AfD ‘politico™’ asking, essentially, ‘what is a woman’—and his interlocutor at the podium yelling more or less incoherently about AfD’s ‘right-wing extremist ties’.

That the subject matter isn’t addressed is seemingly the equivalent of a roadkill, yet let’s not forget the main issue here: both the ‘illoyal opposition™’ and the ‘government™’ are play-acting.

None of these issues is real, for neither side, or wing, of the Uniparty—which, due to European politics being a bit more fragmented relative to the US, come in the bright colours of the rainbow—is discussing any of the real issues.

Oh, lest I forget, the social media user by the moniker Madeleine has the one relevant answer to this charade:

Anyone who leaves reality to the AFD and doesn’t WANT to answer what is a woman and can only use the Nazi bludgeon can leave their position immediately. A question like that can be answered in 3 seconds, anything else is a disgrace! #SPDverrätFrauen [SPD throws women under the bus]

Epilogue

This is all true, but the situation now is quite grave: ‘politicos™’ and ‘journos™’ have long abandoned reality, and the AfD, Ms. Le Pen, and many others like them are of little use.

These alleged ‘right-wingers’ are, in fact, the Trojan Horse of collectivism. This is what the centre-right CSU ‘politico™’ Dobrindt said:

We need stronger obligations for asylum seekers when it comes to taking up work. There must be an offer of work, and this must be part of an integration service.

Now the ‘right-wingers™’, too, want to ‘offer work’, i.e., ‘create jobs’ and add an ‘obligation’.

You can clearly see the writing on the wall: once normalised, the gov’t will impose these obligations on everyone and they will also dictate prices and wages.

Oh, lest I forget, a ‘labour market™’ can not exist for very long if it competes with forced labour and wages, for forced labour will always outcompete free labour.

The prime example of Europeans’ future would be the US prison population right now, but there’s plenty of other examples, such as those documented by Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn’s Gulag Archipelago or, of course, the labour-and-death camps of Nazi Germany.

What a brave new world we’re moving towards ever more rapidly.