So, 1500 years ago, life was much worse than it is today because the world is warming, right? Pilø et al. 2020 shows interesting things--and loads of bias in archaeology
We're still coming out of global ice age. It looks like a good thing or inexorable thing and we should live with it, for can we stop the mother Earth and her magic? LOL.. My dear Watson!
Well, I can't be certain if fossil emissions have an effect, maybe somewhat, maybe 20%, probably not that high, certainly not what the totalitarians claim. But I can be certain that something special happened to stabilize the climate some 12,000+- years ago. This would be a theory to people who haven't studied the natural equation, the stabilization of growing and increasing iterations of life could be the key contribution to this stabilization.
Like climaxing forests do moderate the extremes of regional climate.
I used to converse with someone in Norway who worked for the UN, when she showed a pictured of the landscape surrounding her house I commented on it being clear-cut, having no old trees to moderate the climate. She didn't like me much after that.
Its clear to me humans have ended the stability, this little pass is nothing should my hunch be right, because humans are not going to stop harvesting the life, extinguishing species after species, that moderates the climate.
I'm not an expert that is beholden to an indoctrinated class so I can think what I want.
One of which? Do you even understand my analogue? No? okay so maybe you are one of those lol.
But I shall oblige myself: look, I simply used the biblical reference to draw the analogy between a pristine condition, Garten of Eden, and ever changing nature. We are trying to have a more expanded discussion so hold off your aspersions.
I don't speak of pollution. If humans did affect great change it would have been felt already. For example, did humans cause the prior ice age? Micro-climates are another specific category. I believe. As far as I see it, we simply raised a lot of dirt and dust, and gas. The catastrophe that politicians cite for a long time now is the changing nature of the Planet, likely, not humans because Malthusians and Eugenicists use population size as a pointer to climate change and then infer we must off 50% at least. Do you subscribe to that notion? Part of it? Thoughts ?
We're still coming out of global ice age. It looks like a good thing or inexorable thing and we should live with it, for can we stop the mother Earth and her magic? LOL.. My dear Watson!
Well, I can't be certain if fossil emissions have an effect, maybe somewhat, maybe 20%, probably not that high, certainly not what the totalitarians claim. But I can be certain that something special happened to stabilize the climate some 12,000+- years ago. This would be a theory to people who haven't studied the natural equation, the stabilization of growing and increasing iterations of life could be the key contribution to this stabilization.
Like climaxing forests do moderate the extremes of regional climate.
I used to converse with someone in Norway who worked for the UN, when she showed a pictured of the landscape surrounding her house I commented on it being clear-cut, having no old trees to moderate the climate. She didn't like me much after that.
Its clear to me humans have ended the stability, this little pass is nothing should my hunch be right, because humans are not going to stop harvesting the life, extinguishing species after species, that moderates the climate.
I'm not an expert that is beholden to an indoctrinated class so I can think what I want.
There is a lot of evidence that something happened to this planet 12,000 years ago, but the climate is never really stagnant.
Ok, less not stagnant the last period. Now we are in for a double edged sword world of hurt in my view.
Out of sheer curiosity I ask what you refer to.
What do you mean stagnant? As compared to the Garden of Eden and the fertile Levant?
Oh, you're one of those. Never mind then.
One of which? Do you even understand my analogue? No? okay so maybe you are one of those lol.
But I shall oblige myself: look, I simply used the biblical reference to draw the analogy between a pristine condition, Garten of Eden, and ever changing nature. We are trying to have a more expanded discussion so hold off your aspersions.
Humans have probably affected nothing. Mother Earth will continue to change and react and spit out the "offenders".
Not sure about the first part, right on the second.
I don't speak of pollution. If humans did affect great change it would have been felt already. For example, did humans cause the prior ice age? Micro-climates are another specific category. I believe. As far as I see it, we simply raised a lot of dirt and dust, and gas. The catastrophe that politicians cite for a long time now is the changing nature of the Planet, likely, not humans because Malthusians and Eugenicists use population size as a pointer to climate change and then infer we must off 50% at least. Do you subscribe to that notion? Part of it? Thoughts ?