Well, that's true, but check out that comparison with other jobs, esp. healthcare professionals would come to my mind: they make (much) less money than these CoStaPo forces.
“Due to strict approval criteria for vaccines, they can generally be said to be very safe.” Isn’t this the crux of the legal issue? These experimental drugs were rush through the approval process in a criminal fashion. I believe the documents the US FDA had to release recently re: the Pfizer drug showed 1,000+ deaths in the first 3 months after release. Yet, they continue to be approved.
And, yes, the U.S. Constitution is, right now, the only thing keeping free people here free. It can amended via a “Congress of States,” ongoing now. (I’m not sure exactly how it works, but I’m all for it if it can reduce federal power.)
Agreed, BigT, esp. the legal liability conundrum--some of Covidistan's putschists are preparing to backpedal ('already'), stating that the jabs must be effective, for if they aren't (sic), the jab mandate wouldn't make sense, wouldn't it?!
As regards the reduction of federal power, I'm all for that.
"Finally, there’s also the lunacies mentioned by that attorney who claims, without evidence with respect to Covid-19 ‘vaccines’, that stringent measures are in place to ensure safety and efficacy of these biological products." Who is this delusional 'attorney'? He / she is a disturbing clown who should be called out.
Incidentally, her expertise is listed as 'labour law, gambling, public law, civil proceedings and plea deals'. You see, an 'expert' in the sense of gaslighting the readers.
So under $20 an hour to be a Costasi? That strikes me as rather low pay for what should be a very a high-risk occupation.
Well, that's true, but check out that comparison with other jobs, esp. healthcare professionals would come to my mind: they make (much) less money than these CoStaPo forces.
Talk about priorities.
“Due to strict approval criteria for vaccines, they can generally be said to be very safe.” Isn’t this the crux of the legal issue? These experimental drugs were rush through the approval process in a criminal fashion. I believe the documents the US FDA had to release recently re: the Pfizer drug showed 1,000+ deaths in the first 3 months after release. Yet, they continue to be approved.
And, yes, the U.S. Constitution is, right now, the only thing keeping free people here free. It can amended via a “Congress of States,” ongoing now. (I’m not sure exactly how it works, but I’m all for it if it can reduce federal power.)
Agreed, BigT, esp. the legal liability conundrum--some of Covidistan's putschists are preparing to backpedal ('already'), stating that the jabs must be effective, for if they aren't (sic), the jab mandate wouldn't make sense, wouldn't it?!
As regards the reduction of federal power, I'm all for that.
"Finally, there’s also the lunacies mentioned by that attorney who claims, without evidence with respect to Covid-19 ‘vaccines’, that stringent measures are in place to ensure safety and efficacy of these biological products." Who is this delusional 'attorney'? He / she is a disturbing clown who should be called out.
One Eva Erlacher who penned that piece I was discussing above; here's her profile:
https://www.dsc.at/de/component/content/article/85-team/187-eva-erlacher.html
Incidentally, her expertise is listed as 'labour law, gambling, public law, civil proceedings and plea deals'. You see, an 'expert' in the sense of gaslighting the readers.