There were also 7X more deaths among the former, and while Omicron is receding, the IPH still peddles 'vaccines protect' BS while calling for 'strengthened surveillance' to be prepared
I think the term "vaccine evasion" is surely as misleading and deceptive as "vaccine breakthrough". It does not evade nor does not it attempt to evade.
The proper term is "vaccine inefficacy" or "vaccine ineffectiveness".
Another inrestesting post even though it is frustrating to see the political games.
Here in Puerto Rico, the subsecrety of health might be drinking the same water as the people at the IPH. She blamed the surge of corona among school children from age 5 - 11 on their low vaccination rate. (The rate is 70%, which, given the quality of these products, is alarmingly high to me. But anyway...) In her own (translated) words, this low rate could be contributing to the breakout.
Yet the health authority's own documents show that of the tests recently given to this age group, 68% of the positive were among the vaccinated. I'm not epidemiologist, but it seems to me that the vaccinated are the ones primarily pushing the surge.
The newspaper article, of course, didn't mention the publically available data on the tests. That would involve real journalism.
You know, I read your and others’ substacks because I generally agree with your point of view. However, about the Norwegian statistics, is it not possible to say that the unvaxxed are generally children/ younger people that are not so affected by covid, while the hospitalized are the older boosted people that would be in the hospital even without the vax? I don’t read Norwegian and maybe it is in the report, but age breakdown would really help here. That would make the official statement resemble reality.
I think that there is only one 88 year old with 2 vaccines in the ICU. If you add percentages you get two per cent, and if you check the upper lower quartiles both are 88, so one 88 year old is the only possibility.
I think the term "vaccine evasion" is surely as misleading and deceptive as "vaccine breakthrough". It does not evade nor does not it attempt to evade.
The proper term is "vaccine inefficacy" or "vaccine ineffectiveness".
Another inrestesting post even though it is frustrating to see the political games.
Here in Puerto Rico, the subsecrety of health might be drinking the same water as the people at the IPH. She blamed the surge of corona among school children from age 5 - 11 on their low vaccination rate. (The rate is 70%, which, given the quality of these products, is alarmingly high to me. But anyway...) In her own (translated) words, this low rate could be contributing to the breakout.
Yet the health authority's own documents show that of the tests recently given to this age group, 68% of the positive were among the vaccinated. I'm not epidemiologist, but it seems to me that the vaccinated are the ones primarily pushing the surge.
The newspaper article, of course, didn't mention the publically available data on the tests. That would involve real journalism.
So tiring.
You know, I read your and others’ substacks because I generally agree with your point of view. However, about the Norwegian statistics, is it not possible to say that the unvaxxed are generally children/ younger people that are not so affected by covid, while the hospitalized are the older boosted people that would be in the hospital even without the vax? I don’t read Norwegian and maybe it is in the report, but age breakdown would really help here. That would make the official statement resemble reality.
I think that there is only one 88 year old with 2 vaccines in the ICU. If you add percentages you get two per cent, and if you check the upper lower quartiles both are 88, so one 88 year old is the only possibility.
Its quite obvious to all other than to the majority of humans who volunteered for these injection experiments this is not about saving humans.