In the case of Australia, it is the same: they know who is vaccinated by electronic ID but refuse to release the vaccine status of who has died (even children) in the past few years. They know, but do not want us to know, and they are still pushing the vaccines.
Someone like Norman Fenton who recently did a presentation on excess deaths in Australia could analyse these data, but again, the government refuses to release it with the explanation being officially "it is too hard, we do not have time."
'They' heralded hospitalisation differentials between 'vaccinated' vs. 'unvaccinated' until around 2021/22 when the former definitely overtook the latter (the first time this happened was in early autumn 2021 before the third jabs were 'offered', which briefly reversed that trend), and after the ending of mandates in mid-February 2022, they stopped disclosing these numbers altogether claiming that with 'the pandemic™' behind us, publishing this information was no longer necessary.
If you're interested, any kind of update from Norway around Dec. 2021/Jan. 2022 will do, e.g., this one:
They of course know all about this, and since Norway is a centralised monarchy (and not a federation with staggered subsidiarity rights of the various constituent parts), every GP anywhere in the country knows how many shots of what vaxx anyone took upon entering one's national ID number into the healthcare database.
In the final analysis, none of this matters as admission of anything like this will lead to firings and an avalanche of court cases due to manslaughter, second- or even first-degree murder, at least in terms of many public health officials having been, at best, accessories to mass harm and murder, in addition to lying to the public, making up crap as they go, and trying to evade responsibility (while, ironically, appealing to the public's consciousness that it's 'for the greater good' to get in line and shut up).
Unless proven otherwise--by disclosure of these data--I maintain: they know, they also know why they continue to conspire to hide these data, and at this point I think this is all done to avoid personal liability and criminal responsibility.
Imagine the scale of the fraud and crimes committed on an ongoing basis. There's virtually nothing that compares to this in terms of scale and monstrosity, with perhaps the totalitarian regimes of the 20th century being the only plausible comparisons.
(Reading tip: R.J. Rummel, Death by Government, who compiled a 'score' that goes like this: USSR: about 100m killed; PR China: about 60m killed; Nazi Germany: approx. 21m killed.)
It's not a popular take, but I believe they will keep going because they can. There will be no justice because the lie is too big and there are now too many deaths and injuries. My focus now is on saving the people who can still somewhat see what is happening, and explaining to them how it happened.
I see that also as my kind of mission, but I'd be the first to admit that doing so hasn't exactly become easier due to 'current events', such as the mess in Israel/Palestine.
I furthermore suppose that, unlike after WW2 where there was at least a clear winner who said (rather disingenuously, but still) that certain crimes are a no-go, there cannot be any kind of reckoning now before any such recognition has occurred…
I do not think there will be recognition of the covid crimes because the nature of covid democide is so diffuse. Nearly every single person in society went along with the killing.
Mothers killed their children and were even proud of it on social media with all the 'I vaccinated my children' posts. Nurses were social media 'heroes' dancing for the cameras as patients were denied care and murdered on ventilators and remdesivir-midazolam, and they knew it was killing and kept going.
As you rightly say, there must be recognition first, and I do not think there will ever be recognition because everyone in society - even the mothers and nurses - were the killers. If they were to admit that, what would happen? Maybe nothing?
At the moment, people seem content to kill their children, or let the state kill them and nothing happens. I always thought this would be the line in the sand - the killing of the children - but it is not.
People are gaslighting *themselves* by the billions about what happened and we are just watching, because the alternative is total civilisational collapse.
Not sure if Norway has the same law for civil servants or other people employed by state/region/commune that we do, I'd have thought so but I don't know for sure.
Here, if you're a public employee - of any level in any capacity - you are compelled by law to answer any and all questions relating to your function. You are not required to volunteer information, and only what is explicitly asked for need be answered - but it /must/ be answered, and truthfully.
For example, if I was still teaching, I might get asked by a parent what grade their child will receive. If I was to answer in the definite, I'm then compelled to give that grade no matter what (technically, at least). Therefore, public employees must most of the time be rather vague when answering since a definite answer ("You will get side-effects from this vaccine") is actionable if it turns out to be wrong/erroneous or cause injury or such. Even if it's not your fault that you answered wrong, as the case could be with a public health official claiming "vaccines are safe and harmless" - they must know for sure or be able to show they have been misled by someone supposed to give them factually correct information.
It is very much akin to dancing on spear-tips, being a public/civil servant in any front-line capacity.
(In Malmö (Sweden) the strain is such that at any one time one third of the city's employees are on sick-leave.
A private company showing such numbers would be shut-down first and investigated later.)
Hihi, Norway has it's one 'freedom of information' option (we call it 'innsynsbejær', see https://einnsyn.no/), but, of course, it's a nice thing, esp. as public officials can 'opt out' by invoking some privacy and/or 'greater good' clauses (I've seen them invoked some times now, so, it's not that spectacular as all it does is provide a 'get out of jail free' option in terms of them not having to divulge information without you learning the 'true' reasons.
As to the public vs. private institution issue--spot-on. Just one random example from my line of work: over the summer, the faculty management 'discovered' that the budget shortfall had increased by 80%; in any private company, such problems will certainly call for serious consequences, but not so in the public sector. As we're spending tax money, no-one really cares (apparently), so, what gives?
I go back to AP politico Vedum who, albeit in a different context (lack of nurses, doctors, if you can believe it, fellow Northerner [/irony], mention in early June 2023 (and I'm paraphrasing from memory): 'we'll run out of people well before we run out of money'.
There's no way private companies can compete with that kind and level of inanity.
I asked my husband who took one jab despite my pleadings and he admitted that there was no informed consent whatsoever here. Just roll up your sleeve and get jabbed. I find it incredible that people were either really so trusting of their government or fearful - or both! Hopefully many have learnt something from the experience.
We also have ID where our vaccination status is logged here. I produce my ID as rarely as possible and don’t know who sees what when I do. A friend’s daughter went to the dentist who declared ‘I see you are not vaccinated’. I find it extremely creepy!
In the case of Australia, it is the same: they know who is vaccinated by electronic ID but refuse to release the vaccine status of who has died (even children) in the past few years. They know, but do not want us to know, and they are still pushing the vaccines.
Someone like Norman Fenton who recently did a presentation on excess deaths in Australia could analyse these data, but again, the government refuses to release it with the explanation being officially "it is too hard, we do not have time."
This is a lie.
It's the same here.
'They' heralded hospitalisation differentials between 'vaccinated' vs. 'unvaccinated' until around 2021/22 when the former definitely overtook the latter (the first time this happened was in early autumn 2021 before the third jabs were 'offered', which briefly reversed that trend), and after the ending of mandates in mid-February 2022, they stopped disclosing these numbers altogether claiming that with 'the pandemic™' behind us, publishing this information was no longer necessary.
If you're interested, any kind of update from Norway around Dec. 2021/Jan. 2022 will do, e.g., this one:
https://fackel.substack.com/p/the-calm-before-the-child-calls-out-582
They of course know all about this, and since Norway is a centralised monarchy (and not a federation with staggered subsidiarity rights of the various constituent parts), every GP anywhere in the country knows how many shots of what vaxx anyone took upon entering one's national ID number into the healthcare database.
In the final analysis, none of this matters as admission of anything like this will lead to firings and an avalanche of court cases due to manslaughter, second- or even first-degree murder, at least in terms of many public health officials having been, at best, accessories to mass harm and murder, in addition to lying to the public, making up crap as they go, and trying to evade responsibility (while, ironically, appealing to the public's consciousness that it's 'for the greater good' to get in line and shut up).
Unless proven otherwise--by disclosure of these data--I maintain: they know, they also know why they continue to conspire to hide these data, and at this point I think this is all done to avoid personal liability and criminal responsibility.
Imagine the scale of the fraud and crimes committed on an ongoing basis. There's virtually nothing that compares to this in terms of scale and monstrosity, with perhaps the totalitarian regimes of the 20th century being the only plausible comparisons.
(Reading tip: R.J. Rummel, Death by Government, who compiled a 'score' that goes like this: USSR: about 100m killed; PR China: about 60m killed; Nazi Germany: approx. 21m killed.)
Top-notch post, thank you.
Thank you for your kind words.
As an aside, I also wrote a lengthy email to the IPH asking them about these issues, let's see if they respond (to me) or simply 'update' the website.
Grrrrrrrrrrr.
It's not a popular take, but I believe they will keep going because they can. There will be no justice because the lie is too big and there are now too many deaths and injuries. My focus now is on saving the people who can still somewhat see what is happening, and explaining to them how it happened.
I see that also as my kind of mission, but I'd be the first to admit that doing so hasn't exactly become easier due to 'current events', such as the mess in Israel/Palestine.
I furthermore suppose that, unlike after WW2 where there was at least a clear winner who said (rather disingenuously, but still) that certain crimes are a no-go, there cannot be any kind of reckoning now before any such recognition has occurred…
I do not think there will be recognition of the covid crimes because the nature of covid democide is so diffuse. Nearly every single person in society went along with the killing.
Mothers killed their children and were even proud of it on social media with all the 'I vaccinated my children' posts. Nurses were social media 'heroes' dancing for the cameras as patients were denied care and murdered on ventilators and remdesivir-midazolam, and they knew it was killing and kept going.
As you rightly say, there must be recognition first, and I do not think there will ever be recognition because everyone in society - even the mothers and nurses - were the killers. If they were to admit that, what would happen? Maybe nothing?
At the moment, people seem content to kill their children, or let the state kill them and nothing happens. I always thought this would be the line in the sand - the killing of the children - but it is not.
People are gaslighting *themselves* by the billions about what happened and we are just watching, because the alternative is total civilisational collapse.
Also this video about the situation is really excellent https://visceraladventure.substack.com/p/war-and-democide
You can’t help people who are content to not know or understand. Following orders is lazy but easy, and people want easy.
I know, but one has to try.
I admire that. I’ve about given up
Judge me by my efforts and deeds, not by my words.
I, personally, cannot do anything but speak up, if only because I'm a father.
Sigh.
Not sure if Norway has the same law for civil servants or other people employed by state/region/commune that we do, I'd have thought so but I don't know for sure.
Here, if you're a public employee - of any level in any capacity - you are compelled by law to answer any and all questions relating to your function. You are not required to volunteer information, and only what is explicitly asked for need be answered - but it /must/ be answered, and truthfully.
For example, if I was still teaching, I might get asked by a parent what grade their child will receive. If I was to answer in the definite, I'm then compelled to give that grade no matter what (technically, at least). Therefore, public employees must most of the time be rather vague when answering since a definite answer ("You will get side-effects from this vaccine") is actionable if it turns out to be wrong/erroneous or cause injury or such. Even if it's not your fault that you answered wrong, as the case could be with a public health official claiming "vaccines are safe and harmless" - they must know for sure or be able to show they have been misled by someone supposed to give them factually correct information.
It is very much akin to dancing on spear-tips, being a public/civil servant in any front-line capacity.
(In Malmö (Sweden) the strain is such that at any one time one third of the city's employees are on sick-leave.
A private company showing such numbers would be shut-down first and investigated later.)
Hihi, Norway has it's one 'freedom of information' option (we call it 'innsynsbejær', see https://einnsyn.no/), but, of course, it's a nice thing, esp. as public officials can 'opt out' by invoking some privacy and/or 'greater good' clauses (I've seen them invoked some times now, so, it's not that spectacular as all it does is provide a 'get out of jail free' option in terms of them not having to divulge information without you learning the 'true' reasons.
As to the public vs. private institution issue--spot-on. Just one random example from my line of work: over the summer, the faculty management 'discovered' that the budget shortfall had increased by 80%; in any private company, such problems will certainly call for serious consequences, but not so in the public sector. As we're spending tax money, no-one really cares (apparently), so, what gives?
I go back to AP politico Vedum who, albeit in a different context (lack of nurses, doctors, if you can believe it, fellow Northerner [/irony], mention in early June 2023 (and I'm paraphrasing from memory): 'we'll run out of people well before we run out of money'.
There's no way private companies can compete with that kind and level of inanity.
I asked my husband who took one jab despite my pleadings and he admitted that there was no informed consent whatsoever here. Just roll up your sleeve and get jabbed. I find it incredible that people were either really so trusting of their government or fearful - or both! Hopefully many have learnt something from the experience.
We also have ID where our vaccination status is logged here. I produce my ID as rarely as possible and don’t know who sees what when I do. A friend’s daughter went to the dentist who declared ‘I see you are not vaccinated’. I find it extremely creepy!