I find this almost universal denial that any injury can have anything to do with the vaccination so perverse.
I studied nutritional therapy and during my training we were taught to take an extensive history from a client. This began before conception with grandparents and parents health. Went through birth and childhood and everything was considered relevant - diet, where one lived, childhood vaccinations etc. right up to the present day. This was even if a client were in their 60s+. I was taught that anything could be relevant and that ´could’ was so important. It needed to be considered and thought about. Now a vaccination - and a novel technology at that - taken a matter of weeks ago is instantly dismissed and not given a second thought as the cause of someone’s illness.
Yes, it reads as desparate obfuscation of something Bugge (in this case) suspects herself, doesn't it?
We could say "The symptoms aren't due to being hit with a plank to the face" because the symptoms doesn't fit the event, and that'd be true.
Since we don't /know/ the cause(s) of the symptoms described, we can't rule out the vaccine being the cause and must therefore look for second-hand causality indicators, such as the time-frame, other events within the same time-frame, and other causes with similar symptons (an actual stroke or a pre-existing blood clot coming loose and getting stuck elsewhere causing harm f.e.).
Here's the kicker: unless Bugge and the NPE knows the above (which they do, having at least passed the basics in scientific theory when at university) they cannot make such specific denials either.
So they know, but why do they lie?
Because in 2020/2021, parts of the purhcasing agreements between AZ, Pfizer et c and governements were leaked and they clearly stipulated that one term of the contract was that governements would block any and all attempts to link the vaccine with injuries, deaths et c and hold the maker completely free of guilt, responsibility and such and to deny damages to citizens.
That's why they lie, I think: they have political bosses who have instructed them (verbally only) to do so.
'they have political bosses who have instructed them (verbally only) to do so'
I suspect some of the folks involved are actually too incompetent to notice, if only because 'public health' consists of fifth-tier 'professionals' too lazy to go into research and too aloof to become GPs. What remains is…'public health' and the like. Beyond these institutions, such professionals would hardly find a job…
I find this almost universal denial that any injury can have anything to do with the vaccination so perverse.
I studied nutritional therapy and during my training we were taught to take an extensive history from a client. This began before conception with grandparents and parents health. Went through birth and childhood and everything was considered relevant - diet, where one lived, childhood vaccinations etc. right up to the present day. This was even if a client were in their 60s+. I was taught that anything could be relevant and that ´could’ was so important. It needed to be considered and thought about. Now a vaccination - and a novel technology at that - taken a matter of weeks ago is instantly dismissed and not given a second thought as the cause of someone’s illness.
Wake me up when we’ve come to our senses please.
Yes, it reads as desparate obfuscation of something Bugge (in this case) suspects herself, doesn't it?
We could say "The symptoms aren't due to being hit with a plank to the face" because the symptoms doesn't fit the event, and that'd be true.
Since we don't /know/ the cause(s) of the symptoms described, we can't rule out the vaccine being the cause and must therefore look for second-hand causality indicators, such as the time-frame, other events within the same time-frame, and other causes with similar symptons (an actual stroke or a pre-existing blood clot coming loose and getting stuck elsewhere causing harm f.e.).
Here's the kicker: unless Bugge and the NPE knows the above (which they do, having at least passed the basics in scientific theory when at university) they cannot make such specific denials either.
So they know, but why do they lie?
Because in 2020/2021, parts of the purhcasing agreements between AZ, Pfizer et c and governements were leaked and they clearly stipulated that one term of the contract was that governements would block any and all attempts to link the vaccine with injuries, deaths et c and hold the maker completely free of guilt, responsibility and such and to deny damages to citizens.
That's why they lie, I think: they have political bosses who have instructed them (verbally only) to do so.
I think you're spot-on:
'they have political bosses who have instructed them (verbally only) to do so'
I suspect some of the folks involved are actually too incompetent to notice, if only because 'public health' consists of fifth-tier 'professionals' too lazy to go into research and too aloof to become GPs. What remains is…'public health' and the like. Beyond these institutions, such professionals would hardly find a job…
Well that explains a lot - I didn’t know about that clause in the purchasing agreements. The whole business is utterly disgusting.
In all brevity: if you get vaxx-injured, you're wrong; yet, if you claim to be 'born in the wrong body', you must be 'affirmed'.
How does one spell 'cognitive dissonance' in public health-and-journo lingo?