It's possible there will eventually be a downpouring of lawsuits over this sort of thing. But yes, for now they (still) feel within their rights to discriminate. For instance, I've been refused by a doctor due to my unjuiced status. (That would have been bad enough in and of itself, but they only refused me after keeping me on their waiting list for well over two months.) So, I don't have a general practitioner now. And in general, I'm completely disgusted with the medical profession.
One of the paediatric clinic bosses of one of Vienna's main hospitals (the one in Floridsdorf) left his job, citing severe staffing shortfalls.
While I'm unsure if leaving wouldn't exacerbate this problem, the paediatric ward is so understaffed that there are 1-3 MDs there (regular would be 7) who all come from other wards and/or lack dedicated paediatric care credentials and experience.
Might sound like nothing but an anecdote, but I'd suspect that before any of these lawsuits will make it through the judicial system (and I hope they will commence before too long), personnel shortages will massively impact the profession: either we'll see a kind of 'amnesty' for those who left and/or were fired, with employers all but begging them to return (one more comment on its implication below) or something like just happened in NY (reinstatement with back pay).
As to the employers begging esp. MDs and care-workers to return: why should they? I mean, it's comparatively easier for doctors to 'go solo' or in groups, but they would be quite likely way less inclined than before to vie for public insurance compensation contracts (also: why should they, for if they left for reasons that incl. opposition to the experimental gene therapy sold as 'vaccines' and had no support by either politicians or the medical association, there's zero indication that this factor would change in the future). As a result, we'll see the increasing crapification of socialised medicine, courtesy to ill-informed politicians and the spineless critters running the medical establishment. Wait for the wailing (like: 'we don't find suitable and willing applicants anymore') to begin, with any consideration of these aspects. certainly to be drowned out by the similarly spineless critters working in legacy media.
Personally, I hope you're at least o.k. and not finding yourself in an acute medical emergency.
how much money i could have saved if, instead of staying current by paying for, and reading, quite expensive legal magazines, i would have read tabloids....
Well, I dunno about you, but I suppose this magic plant here would cure your cancer, eh?
In addition, reading tabloids might actually--and factually--have caused you to care less about, say, the constitution, statute, and the like. Weird world we're finding ourselves in.
The 'vaccinators' are equal opportunity harassers, it would seem.
In the grand 'moral arc of the universe', the Branch Covidians are certainly an evolutionary step up from earlier iterations of totalitarians who always had at least a bunch of existing issues to point to (race, Jewish-ness, class affiliation, etc.).
Now, in our brave postmodern world, it all comes down to 'individual choices' about 'vaccination'. One may choose, or one may be coerced, but it's important to stress the intersectionality (muahahaha) between time-limited 'Covid Passports' and being denied access on the basis of 'lifestyle choices'.
It's possible there will eventually be a downpouring of lawsuits over this sort of thing. But yes, for now they (still) feel within their rights to discriminate. For instance, I've been refused by a doctor due to my unjuiced status. (That would have been bad enough in and of itself, but they only refused me after keeping me on their waiting list for well over two months.) So, I don't have a general practitioner now. And in general, I'm completely disgusted with the medical profession.
I sure hope so.
One of the paediatric clinic bosses of one of Vienna's main hospitals (the one in Floridsdorf) left his job, citing severe staffing shortfalls.
While I'm unsure if leaving wouldn't exacerbate this problem, the paediatric ward is so understaffed that there are 1-3 MDs there (regular would be 7) who all come from other wards and/or lack dedicated paediatric care credentials and experience.
Might sound like nothing but an anecdote, but I'd suspect that before any of these lawsuits will make it through the judicial system (and I hope they will commence before too long), personnel shortages will massively impact the profession: either we'll see a kind of 'amnesty' for those who left and/or were fired, with employers all but begging them to return (one more comment on its implication below) or something like just happened in NY (reinstatement with back pay).
As to the employers begging esp. MDs and care-workers to return: why should they? I mean, it's comparatively easier for doctors to 'go solo' or in groups, but they would be quite likely way less inclined than before to vie for public insurance compensation contracts (also: why should they, for if they left for reasons that incl. opposition to the experimental gene therapy sold as 'vaccines' and had no support by either politicians or the medical association, there's zero indication that this factor would change in the future). As a result, we'll see the increasing crapification of socialised medicine, courtesy to ill-informed politicians and the spineless critters running the medical establishment. Wait for the wailing (like: 'we don't find suitable and willing applicants anymore') to begin, with any consideration of these aspects. certainly to be drowned out by the similarly spineless critters working in legacy media.
Personally, I hope you're at least o.k. and not finding yourself in an acute medical emergency.
how much money i could have saved if, instead of staying current by paying for, and reading, quite expensive legal magazines, i would have read tabloids....
Well, I dunno about you, but I suppose this magic plant here would cure your cancer, eh?
In addition, reading tabloids might actually--and factually--have caused you to care less about, say, the constitution, statute, and the like. Weird world we're finding ourselves in.
Disgusting. It's like they would ask "Are you jewish?".
Yes, it is, but when they're doing it, it's all fine as long as no gas chambers are involved.
Equity in atrocity.
Everyone gets the jabs, not just designated undesirables.
Imagine that, "improving" on both Stalin and Beria, Hitler and Himmler.
The 'vaccinators' are equal opportunity harassers, it would seem.
In the grand 'moral arc of the universe', the Branch Covidians are certainly an evolutionary step up from earlier iterations of totalitarians who always had at least a bunch of existing issues to point to (race, Jewish-ness, class affiliation, etc.).
Now, in our brave postmodern world, it all comes down to 'individual choices' about 'vaccination'. One may choose, or one may be coerced, but it's important to stress the intersectionality (muahahaha) between time-limited 'Covid Passports' and being denied access on the basis of 'lifestyle choices'.
How perfectly fitting, ain't it?
When everybody is equal in worth, everybody is interchangeable, and therefore everybody's worth, individual as well as cumulative, is zero.
Like nails or screws. Long as there are identical 4" nails in the nailbox, I don't care about which one I use.
And since humans produce humans and all humans are worth the same...
Even Stalin would have been revolted.
The title of the post has a small typo: the "No Jab, No Jab" should be "No Jab, No Job" (but I prefer the original as a policy).
Hi Sanjoy, thanks for pointing this out--a Freudian slip of the tongue, so to speak, if there ever was one…