Compulsory EU (Military) Service Discussed in Brussels
As related by Hungarian Foreign Minister, the EU appears to be mulling a new crusade
This is clearly a brief follow-up on yesterday’s posting:
Today, we turn our attention to the apparently impending introduction of a EU-led compulsory (military) service for European ‘citizens’ (sic). As friend-of-these pages Peter Mayer of TKP.at reported yesterday, there are apparently high-level discussions going on in Brussels:
The high Ukrainian death toll, coupled with Ukraine’s difficulties in recruiting its own population, means the EU will increasingly move to drafting European youth, especially in Ukraine’s geographical proximity, to fight Russia, the said Hungarian Foreign Minister Péter Szijjártó after a meeting with the EU foreign ministers.
‘Ukrainian losses are becoming more and more unbearable, Ukrainian men are no longer allowed to leave Ukraine, and now they also want to conscript European young people into the war. And since the escalation hits this area first, one can almost clearly hear the argument that the soldiers should be sent from the geographical vicinity first. All this means that they want to send Central European youth, including Hungarian youth, to war with a European conscription’, Szijjártó said in an interview with Hungarian media .
The Hungarian Foreign Minister stated that he was firmly against any move to introduce European conscription: ‘Hands off the Central Europeans, hands off the Hungarian youth, we will not allow the Hungarian youth to be drawn into the war, because this is not the case our war.’
See also this posting over at Twitter/X.
Szijjártó did not reveal which foreign ministers or member states are exploring the possibility of European conscription, but several countries have recently said they would consider sending their own troops to Ukraine if Russia makes a breakthrough on the Ukrainian front, including France and more recently the Baltic States.
However, a long-term goal of the US-aligned establishment in Brussels is the creation of an EU military force, including removing the defense decision-making process from member states and centralization in Brussels. Such a proposal could introduce compulsory military service across all EU member states…
Szijjártó described an extremely intense atmosphere at the Council of Foreign Ministers in Brussels ahead of the European Parliament elections. The mood changed when those present began to talk about releasing 6.5 billion euros to Ukraine, which the Hungarian foreign minister rejected, saying it would only escalate the war. However, his position has come under extreme pressure from a number of other countries…
‘And there was a big mess here. The German, Lithuanian, Irish, Polish and other colleagues have opposed me on this issue, but that has not shaken our position, despite the cries of European pro-war politicians’, [Szijjártó] said…
‘They think that if they shout from many directions then I will say that it is good, that it is okay. But they should already know us well enough to know that won’t happen’, he added.
Bottom Lines
There is nothing new under the sun, apparently. The idea of military union is older than the Second World War, and it merely accompanies the envisioned fiscal union will soon create a ‘new’ entity.
Fiscal-financial (credit)-military shenanigans are upon us, all of which is clearly designed by the planners in Washington, New York, and London to ensure that Europeans are sacrificed on the altar of Anglo-American hegemony.
There is little time, or hope, left that this conflict will not spill out of control.
There is similarly little hope that sanity will prevail in ‘the West’.
With unrest in Georgia and the potentially explosive situation in the Middle East destined to complicate matters further, there is but one question on my mind:
Is the prospect of a series of overlapping conflicts spiralling out of control the intended outcome to introduce draconian restrictions in the face of the impending economic crash? Or are these overlapping conflicts a symptom of globalist elites in Washington, New York, and London losing control?
In other words: is the tail wagging the dog or vice versa?
European nations should understand that all European integration organizations were setup to advance Imperial Oligarchy’s interests. How can profoundly anti-democratic structures in service of the Oligarchy replace (more or less) democratic national governance while expecting the interest of the people to be taken into account? The interest of the people and the interest of Imperial Oligarchy are utterly divergent. When the Oligarchy acts in its own interests that invariably means they are acting against the interest of the people. This is so across the Western Empire, but it is now acutely visible in Europe. The media, European political class, financial structures, deep state structures have all been throughly penetrated so much that they will carry out Imperil orders even when it is clearly visible those lead to the economic and cultural destruction of Europe. The situation is so bad that one would expect a wide spread revolt from European nations but only Hungary and Slovakia seem to be making any real noise in opposition to the direction the Western Oligarchy is taking Europe. The West, as we know it, is slated for destruction because the greatest threat to the Oligarchical System are the people who believe they should be governed by their consent. The Western Oligarchy is waging an Omniwar on its own people in order to remain in power through the final Global Integration. If they must destroy our Civilization, murder billions to achieve their goal they will do it! What is disconcerting is that so few of us see what is happening.
"European youth." Why such ageism?? Those most enthusiastic about war-making should be given a gun and sent to Ukraine, regardless of the date of birth assigned to them at birth. Jens, Ursula, Josep, and of yeah, Annalena (she has a relatively recent date of birth assigned at birth). Oh, and that lady from Estonia (what's her name?).