I think they copied how you build enclosures for zoo- and lab-animals.
And not a single mention of reasons for strokes in children.
I did a quick search for "stroke barn" in Swedish and found an organisation for stroke victims, that listed heart diseases, coagulant-imparing/affecting diseases, systemic illness whatever that means, traumas and infections, and mumps.
Immediate thought: there's a clear overlap between known mRNA-shot side effects and this.
I *noticed* that, too, but I'm at the point of, hey, why bother pointing it out since there's no *medical* literature reference to anything about 'childhood strokes' in the first place.
As to your (obvious) 'immediate thought', well, of course, but we both also know that 'correlation ≠ causation', right? Right.
But, ceteris paribus, it does give a good idea of where to start looking and what to look for.
Drinking/hangovers f.e.
Saying that tend to infuriate the kind of people who'd use the correlation/causation-line without understanding it. Bet you've run into quite a number of students and colleagues that've demonstrated that particular intellectual handicap?
the following paragraph to me proves that it's a grift (in my language we call it 'fried air'), because right in the first sentence one can take out the words 'a stroke', in the following sentence the word 'these' and the rest still remains the same blah-di-blah blatter: "...When children suffer //a stroke//, it affects their entire living environment. The project impressively demonstrates how important it is to provide //these// children with holistic support, to design spaces that make their everyday lives easier but also offer them a challenge to work out and practice skills when necessary, while providing support to their families....".
It's certainly a grift, esp. imagine being on the grant-awarding committee: who could say anything against helping children who suffered strokes? Once that kind of card is played, it doesn't matter what one is talking about, least of all the 'proximal origins' (pun intended) of said childhood strokes.
I think they copied how you build enclosures for zoo- and lab-animals.
And not a single mention of reasons for strokes in children.
I did a quick search for "stroke barn" in Swedish and found an organisation for stroke victims, that listed heart diseases, coagulant-imparing/affecting diseases, systemic illness whatever that means, traumas and infections, and mumps.
Immediate thought: there's a clear overlap between known mRNA-shot side effects and this.
I *noticed* that, too, but I'm at the point of, hey, why bother pointing it out since there's no *medical* literature reference to anything about 'childhood strokes' in the first place.
As to your (obvious) 'immediate thought', well, of course, but we both also know that 'correlation ≠ causation', right? Right.
Correlation does not equal causation, yes.
But, ceteris paribus, it does give a good idea of where to start looking and what to look for.
Drinking/hangovers f.e.
Saying that tend to infuriate the kind of people who'd use the correlation/causation-line without understanding it. Bet you've run into quite a number of students and colleagues that've demonstrated that particular intellectual handicap?
I of course agree, and that experience is exactly what I see, too.
Strange, eh?!
the following paragraph to me proves that it's a grift (in my language we call it 'fried air'), because right in the first sentence one can take out the words 'a stroke', in the following sentence the word 'these' and the rest still remains the same blah-di-blah blatter: "...When children suffer //a stroke//, it affects their entire living environment. The project impressively demonstrates how important it is to provide //these// children with holistic support, to design spaces that make their everyday lives easier but also offer them a challenge to work out and practice skills when necessary, while providing support to their families....".
nice find, thanks for posting.
It's certainly a grift, esp. imagine being on the grant-awarding committee: who could say anything against helping children who suffered strokes? Once that kind of card is played, it doesn't matter what one is talking about, least of all the 'proximal origins' (pun intended) of said childhood strokes.
Blessings and appreciation from Sydney Australia.
The negligence of “ them “ is more n more gross each day.
And: whatever happened to taking care of those who can't fend for themselves?
It’s the knowledge of them creating - those who can’t take care of them selves that is so sickening.
Once seen can’t be unseen.
Thankfully.