In an Op-ed, Peter Haisenko argues that the (ab)use of 'antisemitism' has reached its (il)logical final frontier while Bhakdi's lawyer, Prof. Martin Schwab, discusses future proceedings
Thank you for this article. I am a retired journalist. The complicity of the media in this deadly Corona vaccine push is the most disgusting thing I have witnessed in my life.
Hard to believe the professions of medicine and journalism have been so compromised. But there it is. The evidence is all around us.
Thanks for reading and commenting. I'd love to say, 'you're welcome', but I fear that the topic isn't anything to be dealt with in such cavalier ways.
Calling out the complicity of what passes for 'mainstream journalism' these days, I think, is necessary. At the same time, the I'd argue it's fair to state that 'medicine' has been there since before WW1 (see, 'eugenics'), and now 'journalism' is merely 'catching up', so to speak (or, rather, adjusting 'downwards').
Thank you for these translations, Stephan. As you likely know, I have been following Sucharit’s case closely, having launched the #IStandWithSucharit campaign prior to his trial:
I found Martin’s comments about holding politicians, authorities, manufacturers, and the media legally accountable especially inspiring. I hope he takes on the challenge.
Margaret Anna, thanks for taking the time and posting here--do spread the word about the above piece, if you'd like.
I've read your posting (but, as harsh and unfair as this must sound, I do read the emails on my phone, which doesn't permit liking without going online, hence I typically don't interact.)
While I have no way of knowing, I doubt that Martin Schwab, after having defended Bhakdi in court, would stop here. (Also, the public prosecutor's office has already appealed the acquittal, hence, the next iteration will come before too long).
I am glad for Dr. Bhakdi’s victory in court. Jurisprudence is mortally wounded in the West. Totalitarianism marches on because the top of the pyramid desires it and because a critical mass of people have been successfully brainwashed.
Thank you for sharing more information and light on this important topic, and incredible courageous man, and maybe more importantly infusing some hope in justice still existing 😊🙏
As to the subject matter, I doubt the court had this outcome in mind, which is why I've translated that op-ed: so long, allegations of 'Anti-Semitism' typically destroyed careers, if not lives. Perhaps, this is now truly over with (even though I wouldn't hold my breath if there will be more lives destroyed before this rans out of steam).
As to the existence of 'justice', well, Germany's public prosecutors are beholden to orders by politicians (see that above-linked piece; it's not just my 'opinion', but the European Court of Justice has ruled that way), and I do happen to share Martin Schwab's assessment that, if the court would have moved towards 'discovery' with regard to Sucharit Bhakdi's scientific claims, it would open a veritable Pandora's Box with respect to the judiciary beginning to work again and looking into the Corona management at all levels.
The only cultural difference between palestinians and jews is the spelling of the name of the respective tribe.
In behaviour, values, mores, social codes and respect for humans not belonging to their tribe they are identical.
What all western nations should do, is withdraw any and all support from either of them. Let them sort it out themselves. They may choose to continue their thousands of years old family feud over whether Ismael was the legitimate child or not, or they may choose to make peace.
Oh, well, we'll see--I suspect the 'Anti-Semitism' club serves one or more purposes, hence these policies will continue (until, at some indeterminate point in time in the future, they won't).
Thank you for this article. I am a retired journalist. The complicity of the media in this deadly Corona vaccine push is the most disgusting thing I have witnessed in my life.
Hard to believe the professions of medicine and journalism have been so compromised. But there it is. The evidence is all around us.
Thanks for reading and commenting. I'd love to say, 'you're welcome', but I fear that the topic isn't anything to be dealt with in such cavalier ways.
Calling out the complicity of what passes for 'mainstream journalism' these days, I think, is necessary. At the same time, the I'd argue it's fair to state that 'medicine' has been there since before WW1 (see, 'eugenics'), and now 'journalism' is merely 'catching up', so to speak (or, rather, adjusting 'downwards').
Sigh.
Thank you for these translations, Stephan. As you likely know, I have been following Sucharit’s case closely, having launched the #IStandWithSucharit campaign prior to his trial:
• “Profiles in Courage: Prof. Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi” (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/profiles-in-courage-prof-dr-sucharit)
I found Martin’s comments about holding politicians, authorities, manufacturers, and the media legally accountable especially inspiring. I hope he takes on the challenge.
Margaret Anna, thanks for taking the time and posting here--do spread the word about the above piece, if you'd like.
I've read your posting (but, as harsh and unfair as this must sound, I do read the emails on my phone, which doesn't permit liking without going online, hence I typically don't interact.)
While I have no way of knowing, I doubt that Martin Schwab, after having defended Bhakdi in court, would stop here. (Also, the public prosecutor's office has already appealed the acquittal, hence, the next iteration will come before too long).
I’m really liking Martin. There are some great quotes from him in this piece, too:
• https://neveragainisnowglobal.substack.com/p/sucharit-bhakdi-how-a-humble-man
Ha, thanks for putting up the link, I shall include it into the above piece.
I am glad for Dr. Bhakdi’s victory in court. Jurisprudence is mortally wounded in the West. Totalitarianism marches on because the top of the pyramid desires it and because a critical mass of people have been successfully brainwashed.
Thank you for sharing more information and light on this important topic, and incredible courageous man, and maybe more importantly infusing some hope in justice still existing 😊🙏
Thank you, Eva, for your kind words.
As to the subject matter, I doubt the court had this outcome in mind, which is why I've translated that op-ed: so long, allegations of 'Anti-Semitism' typically destroyed careers, if not lives. Perhaps, this is now truly over with (even though I wouldn't hold my breath if there will be more lives destroyed before this rans out of steam).
As to the existence of 'justice', well, Germany's public prosecutors are beholden to orders by politicians (see that above-linked piece; it's not just my 'opinion', but the European Court of Justice has ruled that way), and I do happen to share Martin Schwab's assessment that, if the court would have moved towards 'discovery' with regard to Sucharit Bhakdi's scientific claims, it would open a veritable Pandora's Box with respect to the judiciary beginning to work again and looking into the Corona management at all levels.
Talk about a self-fulfilling prophecy.
The only cultural difference between palestinians and jews is the spelling of the name of the respective tribe.
In behaviour, values, mores, social codes and respect for humans not belonging to their tribe they are identical.
What all western nations should do, is withdraw any and all support from either of them. Let them sort it out themselves. They may choose to continue their thousands of years old family feud over whether Ismael was the legitimate child or not, or they may choose to make peace.
Let's just leave them to it.
Oh, well, we'll see--I suspect the 'Anti-Semitism' club serves one or more purposes, hence these policies will continue (until, at some indeterminate point in time in the future, they won't).