More writings on more walls: as the rule of law is annihilated in the West, the home front is prepared for the anticipated outbreak™ of war to avoid embarrassing anti-war protests, it seems
It has all the sign of an attack against dissenters, protesters, critics of the government and their "benevolent" representatives. It is not different when you come to think about it, of all those “hate speech laws” who have flourished since the 1990s, they all fall in the same basket, different name, same results.
Reverse evidence-chain is however normal in tax cases: it is always on you to prove the state's assessor wrong, not the other way around.
And presumption of innoncence the idea has old roots - the application and reality is vastly different: class, breeding and station trumped all else until the 1900s, and still do in many cases.
A trivial example:
Recently, someone dumped some apples on the stoop of an SD politician. "Apple" is also criminal migrant-slang for hand grenade. Thus, the politician reported this as a threat, and was roundly mocked by the usual suspects in the media.
Just the other day, someone dumped a load of apples on the stoop of one of the chief mockers (one Leif GW Persson, prof. emeritus of criminology), which the professor immediately reported as a crime.
Now, do you for one second think police would bother even writing a report if I would call them and say: "Someone has dumped 10kg of apples on my stoop! I feel threatened!"?
They'd hang up on me. Because I'm not a Somebody, just an anybody.
Another one:
In my youth two friends of mine were arrested for a robbery (which they were guulty of by the way). One of them came from a better class family, and so his parents paid for an expensive law firm, and he got off with four months probation. The other guy, from a Lumpenprole-background, got a public defender, and served six months in prison.
Same crime, together, at the same time, and neither did more or less than the other.
That is how presumption of guilt and equality before the law has always worked.
I'm not saying you're wrong on anything, what the above posting is supposed to do is--that these politicos™ are now *abandoning* the pretence of equality under the law, the presumption of innocence, and the rule of law itself. That's why I brought this up.
And because once this is done 'because organised crime', you will see that this mushrooms (metastasises) into literally every other aspect of life.
It has all the sign of an attack against dissenters, protesters, critics of the government and their "benevolent" representatives. It is not different when you come to think about it, of all those “hate speech laws” who have flourished since the 1990s, they all fall in the same basket, different name, same results.
Spot-on, and there's going to be more of this nonsense in the foreseeable future.
Even more so now the Americans have launched a 'pre-emptive' strike against Iran. Hold on tight, it could get quite hairy from hereon in.
Yep, and there's no better way for these--and other--shenanigans under the cover of 'look over there: fireworks'.
I suppose we'll know a bit 'more' about that situation in a few days.
Reverse evidence-chain is however normal in tax cases: it is always on you to prove the state's assessor wrong, not the other way around.
And presumption of innoncence the idea has old roots - the application and reality is vastly different: class, breeding and station trumped all else until the 1900s, and still do in many cases.
A trivial example:
Recently, someone dumped some apples on the stoop of an SD politician. "Apple" is also criminal migrant-slang for hand grenade. Thus, the politician reported this as a threat, and was roundly mocked by the usual suspects in the media.
Just the other day, someone dumped a load of apples on the stoop of one of the chief mockers (one Leif GW Persson, prof. emeritus of criminology), which the professor immediately reported as a crime.
Now, do you for one second think police would bother even writing a report if I would call them and say: "Someone has dumped 10kg of apples on my stoop! I feel threatened!"?
They'd hang up on me. Because I'm not a Somebody, just an anybody.
Another one:
In my youth two friends of mine were arrested for a robbery (which they were guulty of by the way). One of them came from a better class family, and so his parents paid for an expensive law firm, and he got off with four months probation. The other guy, from a Lumpenprole-background, got a public defender, and served six months in prison.
Same crime, together, at the same time, and neither did more or less than the other.
That is how presumption of guilt and equality before the law has always worked.
I'm not saying you're wrong on anything, what the above posting is supposed to do is--that these politicos™ are now *abandoning* the pretence of equality under the law, the presumption of innocence, and the rule of law itself. That's why I brought this up.
And because once this is done 'because organised crime', you will see that this mushrooms (metastasises) into literally every other aspect of life.