A cautionary tale about scientific 'truthiness', arrogance, and the troublesome notion of evidence, all wrapped into one historian's talk about 'vaccine hesitancy'
No scientist may demand anything with reagrds to criticism of any hypothesis or theory.
Anyone feeling that criticism, analysis, counter-arguments, pro-et-contra debates, and general skepsis is a crime against science, is conflating Abrahamic religion or ideology with science.
(And the functional difference between religion and ideology is zero, whether the-ism or creed in question is seen as having intrinsic value or intrumental value.)
What this freak fails to recognized is people basically want to be natural. People, understand any/all injections will make a freak like him, I suggest autophagy every day to purge these poisons.
No scientist may demand anything with reagrds to criticism of any hypothesis or theory.
Anyone feeling that criticism, analysis, counter-arguments, pro-et-contra debates, and general skepsis is a crime against science, is conflating Abrahamic religion or ideology with science.
(And the functional difference between religion and ideology is zero, whether the-ism or creed in question is seen as having intrinsic value or intrumental value.)
What this freak fails to recognized is people basically want to be natural. People, understand any/all injections will make a freak like him, I suggest autophagy every day to purge these poisons.
I also recently learned about Prussian Blue.