11 Comments
User's avatar
Rikard's avatar

I wish I could express surprise and shock about this, but... Thalidomide.

0 prison sentences to researchers, owners, marketers or state control functionaires. Zip zero zilch.

Bill for all those born disabled? Tax payers.

I think most normal humans feel that the scale of something matters, so that the bigger and grander the error, crime, whatever is the consequences follow suit, but it doesn't: it's generally the opposite.

Sell methanol as ethanol and cause one death? 10+ years in prison.

Sell an experimental gene-modifying therapy causing millions of deaths? You're a hero.

Attila, Genghis Khan and Stalin really nailed down the nature of power and those who seek to wield it.

Expand full comment
The BarefootHealer's avatar

I've spent 2+ years grieving for all those people around the world, and ones very close to my heart, that made a decision (with or without knowledge) based on trust in institutions with such deathly, and never before seen, serious consequences. Trust, the most fragile yet powerful emotion. Frankly, i would be very interested to analyse how many who said no to the shots, also have had challenging experiences or traumas in their life, vs those who said yes. Unfortunately she is one of millions and in the coming years billions. I don't mean that callously, it's just I've grieved ahead of time, so there is a distancing. I am so sorry for her suffering and her childs loss of their mother, because of a intolerable dispicable farce. In the long run, I'll be thankful for grieving from the start, as I know I will keep functioning when most of the world begins to wail with the loss and grief.

Expand full comment
Barry O'Kenyan's avatar

See. It was from a lab - and it was deliberately released!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UnA-iIkSmr0

Expand full comment
MaryJane's avatar

If that's not war, I do not know what is war. And a much more dangerous one, as the enemy is your government that pretends to be your friend and has full power over you, and you are helpless to fight it back.

Expand full comment
ExcessDeathsAU's avatar

Her eyes in the close-up photo do not look human. Does anyone else see this?

Expand full comment
Anja's avatar

No, I don't. To me they look like the eyes of somebody with lots of worries and pain.

Expand full comment
The BarefootHealer's avatar

I respect your work EDAU, yet I'm not sure where your going with that comment.

I do fear, wherever it is, that path leads to nowhere good, or more specifically not where compassion lives.

Expand full comment
ExcessDeathsAU's avatar

Ask Pfizer and US congress. As a messenger, I am used to being shot. People do not like what they see, cover their eyes crying 'compassion! compassion!' Then they understand.

https://www.congress.gov/bill/109th-congress/senate-bill/659/text

https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_votes/vote1171/vote_117_1_00212.htm

https://www.mdpi.com/1467-3045/44/3/73

I am not changing people's DNA. I am not creating chimera. I am merely cataloging their relentless pursuit of transhumanism. If anyone is to suffer in the new system, it is to be us who are untransformed, made in the image of God. They will have no compassion for us.

Expand full comment
The BarefootHealer's avatar

The Congress piece only applies to human chimera creation via reproduction in lab.

The paper showing that the shots affect DNA and reverse transcribe into human genome, well I can only assume (I don't mind making an a$$ of myself), that your implying that should those who have taken the shot reproduce, then their offspring will be chimeric?

Expand full comment
ExcessDeathsAU's avatar

The paper and bills are cracks in a wall allowing us to see something much larger.

Given their track record, I would suggest three things 1) that they are probably 50 years ahead of what we in the public are allowed to see with regards to the creation of chimera that are probably occurring in places like China with US expertise, 2) we do not know the long-term genetic implications of the jab, and 3) no matter the 'safety profile' of the 'safest jab,' even the possibility that it could change DNA in vivo renders it an impossibly for Christians to accept. Christians who have taken it need to repent. Just my take.

Expand full comment
Rikard's avatar

I have to butt in and ask:

Why would the offspring display chimeric properties?

By what mechanism(s) does the mRNA in the shots cause the sperm and ova to produce a chimera out of the zygote(s)?

What has any of it to do with religion?

Expand full comment