US Aggression vs. Germany is the Real Driving Force in the Russian-Ukrainian Quagmire
US Aggression vs. Germany is the Real Driving Force in the Russian-Ukrainian Quagmire
A RAND Corporation report dated 25 Jan. 2022 proves that Washington, not the Kremlin, is the aggressor in this conflict, with the EU and Germany as Washington's main objective
EDIT (15 Sept. 2022): since this post appeared, RAND Corp. has issued a statement denying the authenticity of the document in question. For accountability reasons, I shall not change or delete the posting, but you are encouraged to check out my dedicated posting on this subject matter.
About 21 years after ‘9/11’, the truth—known to those on the receiving end of US-led policies since 1945—about the malevolence of the USA cannot be hidden anymore.
Sure, a lot of things in the current quagmire—call it what you want: a ‘special military operation’, a ‘war of aggression’ (Angriffskrieg, which is what German-language legacy media typically uses), or the like. Sometimes German-language legacy media even uses the term ‘war of extermination’ (Vernichtungskrieg), perhaps to absolve their own countries’ sordid past, but who really knows what’s going on in the editorial meetings of these dark and disturbed places…
Today’s column isn’t about 9/11, and it isn’t even about what I think is right or wrong. In war and peace, as well as in international relations, there are hardly such notions as ‘right’ or ‘wrong’. Countries don’t have friends or allies, the one thing that exists in international relations—that is, in its Western style—are power-political realities.
Might makes right, since the days of the ancient Greeks, as Thucydides already, and much more eloquently so, explained in The Peloponnesian War. Written almost 2,500 years ago, the age-old adage seems, to me at least, very well up to helping us understand the present:
As the world goes, is only in question between equals in power, while the strong do what they can and the weak suffer what they must.
(I’m fondly quoting from Richard Crawley’s beautiful translation of The Peloponnesian War (London, 1923), Book V, ‘The Melian Conference’, p. 394.)
RAND Advised Washington—to Weaken Germany on 25 Jan. 2022
I first came across the below content two weeks ago when Thomas Röper, a Russia-based independent journalist, first published a German translation of a recent report by the RAND Corporation. His posting is dated 1 Sept. 2022, and the one and only reason I didn’t bring it to your attention was that neither Mr. Röper nor I could verify its authenticity.
Believe me, I’ve tried to do so, but despite my considerable, if academic, experience in tracking down stuff online, all my enquiries ended on ‘404’ pages.
Entitled, ‘Weakening Germany, strengthening the U.S.’, RAND Corporation proposed—on 25 Jan. 2022, i.e., a month before Russia commenced the live-action phase of its ‘special military operation’—to use the ‘zealous German Greens’ to destroy the German and European economies. Due to their energy dependence on Russia—notably natural gas for Germany and nuclear fuel for France—the entire EU/EEC bloc would become heavily dependent on US-controlled resources.
I’m reproducing the report, which I finally found online over at the 2nd Smartest Guy in the World’s Substack, which was posted on 12/13 Sept., incl. pictures thus proving (to me) its authenticity.
Credit: courtesy of the 2nd Smartest Guy in the World’s Substack.
Also, note that former US gov’t specialist Larry C. Johnson considers the below text authentic.
In other words, as Michael Hudson wrote over half a year ago, ‘America Defeats Germany a Third Time in a Century’.
As I said, some people already knew the US wasn’t the ‘friend and ally’ its establishment claimed it was. Don’t take my word for, here are RAND’s considerations (my emphases).
Weakening Germany, strengthening the U.S.
The present state of the U.S. economy does not suggest that it can function without the financial and material support from external sources. The quantitive easing policy, which the Fed has resorted to regularly in recent years, as well as the uncontrolled issue of cash during the 2020 and 2021 Covid lockdowns, have led to a sharp increase in the external debt and an increase in the dollar supply.
The continuing deterioration of the economic situation is highly likely to lead to a loss in the position of the Democratic Party in Congress and the Senate in the forthcoming elections to be held in November 2022. The impeachment of the President cannot be ruled out under these circumstances, which must be avoided at all costs.
There in an urgent need for resources to flow into the national economy, especially the banking system. Only European countries bound by EU and NATO commitments will be able to provide them without significant military and political costs for us.
The major obstacle to it is growing independence of Germany. Although it still is a country with limited sovereignty, for decades it has been consistently moving toward lifting these limitations and becoming a fully independent state. This movement is slow and cautious, but steady. Extrapolation shows that the ultimate goal can be reached only in several decades. However, if social and economic problems in the United States escalate, the pace could accelerate significantly.
An additional factor contributing to Germany’s economic independence is Brexit. With the withdrawal of the UK from the EU structures, we have lost a meaningful opportunity to influence the negotiation of crossgovernmental decisions.
It is fear of our negative response which by and large determines the relatively slow speed of those changes. If one day we abandon Europe, there will be a good chance for Germany and France to get to a full political consensus. Then, Italy and other Old Europe countries — primarily the former ECSC members — may join it on certain conditions. Britain, which is currently outside the European Union, will not be able to resist the pressure of the Franco-German duo alone. If implemented, this scenario will eventually turn Europe into not only an economic, but also a political competitor to the United States.
Besides, if the U.S. is for a certain period is engulfed by domestic problems, the Old Europe will be able to more effectively resist the influence of U.S.-oriented Eastern European countries.
Vulnerabilities in German and EU Economy
An increase in the flow of resources from Europe to U.S. can be expected if Germany begins to experience a controlled economic crisis. The pace of the economic developments in the EU depends almost without alternative on the state of the German economy. It is Germany that bears the brunt of the expenditure directed towards the poorer EU members.
The current German economic model is based on two pillars. These are unlimited access to cheap Russian energy resources and to cheap French electric power, thanks to the operation of nuclear plants. The importance of the first factor is considerably higher. Halting Russian supplies can well create a systemic crisis that would be devastating for the German economy and, indirectly, for the entire European Union.
The French energy sector could also soon being to experience heavy problems. The predictable stop of Russian-controlled nuclear supplies, combined with the unstable situation in the Sahel region, would make French energy sector critically dependent on Australian and Canadian fuel. In connection with the establishment of AUKUS, it creates new opportunities to exercise pressure. However this issue is beyond the scope of the present report.
A Controlled Crisis
Due to coalition constraints, the German leadership is not in full control of the situation in the country. Thanks to our precise actions, it has been possible to block the commissioning of the Nord Stream 2 pipeline, despite the opposition of lobbyists from the steel and chemical industries. However, the dramatic deterioration of the living standards may encourage leadership to reconsider its policy and return to the idea of European sovereignty and strategic autonomy.
The only feasible way to guarantee Germany’s rejection of Russian energy supplies is to involved both sides in the military conflict in Ukraine. Our further actions in this country will inevitably lead to a military response from Russia. Russians will obviously not be able to leave unanswered the massive Ukrainian army pressure on the unrecognized Donbas republics. That would make possible to declare Russia an aggressor and apply to it the entire package of sanctions prepared beforehand.
Putin may in turn decide to impose limited counter sanctions — primarily on Russian energy supplies to Europe. Thus, the damage to the EU countries will be quite comparable to the one to Russians, and in some countries — primarily in Germany — it will be higher.
The prerequisite for Germany to fall into this trap is the leading role of green parties and ideology in Europe. The German Greens are a strongly dogmatic, if not zealous, movement, which makes it quite easy to make them ignore economic arguments. In this respect, the German Greens somewhat exceed their counterparts in the rest of Europe. Personal features and the lack of professionalism of their leaders — primarily Annalena Baerbock and Robert Habeck — permit to presume that it is next to impossible for them to admit their own mistakes in a timely manners.
Thus, it will be enough to quickly form the media image of Putin’s aggressive war to turn the Greens into ardent and hardline supporters of sanctions, a ‘party of war’. It will enable the sanctions regime to be introduced without any obstacles. The lack of professionalism of the current leaders will not allow a setback in the future, even when the negative impact of the chose policy becomes obvious enough. The partners in the German governing coalition will simply have to follow their allies — at least until the load of economic problems outweighs the fear of provoking a government crisis.
However, even when the SPD and the FDP are ready to go against the Greens, the possibility for the next government to return relations with Russia to normal soon enough will be noticeable limited. Germany’s involvement in large supplies of weapons and military equipment to the Ukrainian army will inevitably generate a strong mistrust in Russia, which will make the negotiations process quite lengthy.
If war crimes and Russian aggression against Ukraine are confirmed, the German political leadership will not be able to overcome its EU partners’ veto on assistance to Ukraine and reinforced sanctions packages. This will ensure a sufficiently long gap in cooperation between Germany and Russia, which will make large German economic operators uncompetitive.
Expected Consequences
A reduction in Russian energy supplies — ideally, a complete halt of such supplies — would lead to disastrous outcomes for German industry. The need to divert significant amounts of Russian gas for winter heating of residential and public facilities will further exacerbate the shortages. Lockdowns in industrial enterprises will cause shortages of components and spare parts for manufacturing, a breakdown of logistics chai[n]s, and, eventually, a domino effect. A complete standstill at the largest chemical, metallurgical, and machine-building, plants is likely, while they have virtually no spare capacity to reduce energy consumption. It could lead to the shutting down of continuous-cycle enterprises, which could mean their destruction.
The cumulative losses of the German economy can be estimated only approximately. Even if the restriction of Russian supplies is limited to 2022, its consequence will last for several years, and the total losses could reach 200-300 billion euros. Not only will it deliver a devastating blow to the German economy, but the entire EU economy will inevitably collapse. We are talking not about a decline in economy growth pace, but about a sustained recession and a decline in GDP only in material production by 3-4% per year for the next 5-6 years. Such a fall will inevitably cause panic in the financial markets and may bring them to a collapse.
The euro will inevitably, and most likely irreversibly, fall below the dollar. A sharp fall of euro will consequently cause its global sale. It will become a toxic currency, and all countries in the world will rapidly reduce its share in their forex reserves. This gap will be primarily filled with dollar and yuan.
Another inevitable consequence of a prolonged economic recession will be a sharp drop in living standards and rising unemployment (up to 200,000-400,000 in Germany alone), which will entail the exodus of skilled labour and well-educated young people. There are literally no other destinations for such immigration other than the United States today. A somewhat smaller, but also quite significant flow of migrants can be expected from other EU countries.
The scenario under consideration will thus serve to strengthen the national financial conditions both indirectly and most directly. In the short term, it will reverse the trend of the looming economic recession and, in addition, consolidate American society by distracting it from immediate economic concerns. This, in turn, will reduce electoral risks.
In the medium terms (4-5 years), the cumulative benefits of capital flight, re-oriented logistical flows and reduced competition in major industries may amount to USD 7-9 trillion.
Unfortunately, China is also expected to benefit over the medium term from this emerging scenario. At the same time, Europe’s deep political dependence on the U.S. allows us to effectively neutralise possible attempts by individual European states to draw closer to China.
Bottom Lines
The 2nd Smartest Guy in the World has some more comments, as does Thomas Röper, so I shall restrict myself to the following considerations:
Note that I only highlighted one half paragraph in the ‘Expected Consequences’ section. While I consider the document important in its entirety, here’s what the highlighted section actually means:
We are talking not about a decline in economy growth pace, but about a sustained recession and a decline in GDP only in material production by 3-4% per year for the next 5-6 years. Such a fall will inevitably cause panic in the financial markets and may bring them to a collapse.
A decline of GDP of 3-4% for 5-6 years is approx. equal to the economic contraction experienced by Germany during WW1. During the period from 1914-19, the German economy was put on a war footing and eventually virtually all non-essential production ceased. As a result, the once-booming economy of Germany contracted by about a third during five years, and I shall not bother to explain what happened afterwards.
I’ve done that a while ago, so please venture over to the below postings:
Note that a decline in economic output by about a third is also what Greece was made to suffer—ironically, by a cabal of German, French, and Dutch politicians at the ‘request’ of their largest banking institutions—in the so-called ‘Euro Crisis’.
Don’t just take my word for it, here’s Mark Blyth (Prof., Political Economy, Brown U), talking about it many moons ago.
Do their great credit, the Greeks voted for a socialist-left faction (Syriza) before buckling under the pressure of the Northern creditors.
Here’s my trick question for you to ponder: if the much more spoiled ‘Northerners’ are to suffer such a calamity, do you honestly think French, Dutch, or German voters will vote ‘far-left’ (ahem) to counter these issues?
My fear is this: we ain’t seen nothin’ yet about the stupidity, vanity, and utter dependence of Eurocrats on Washington.
I suspect that things will be moving rather faster before Christmas, for a variety of reasons, but the main driving force will be the political-economic cataclysm that is about to break the EU’s back.
Sorry to break it up to you, but not everything is about Germany. And not everything is a conspiracy. The poor choices Germany has done to destroy its energy sercurity during past decades have been done by Germans, not foreign countries, either due ideology or stupidity, or both.
I don’t think that a few photos and opinions are enough to verify something like this.
Not that I would put it past the party in power ( Democrats) to engineer something like this to stay in power...
BUT, how do you know that this document wasn’t forged by the Russians to divide the US from our Allies in Europe? We didn’t make your country dependent on Russia. You (as a country) did that yourselves despite Donald Trump warning you not to do it.
I’ve even seen a clip of your UN Reps giggling when Trump warned against the pipeline.