Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Rikard's avatar

Laws are silent in times of war, as some greek or roman said long ago.

The general is not wrong (not talking morals here): if Israel is to be rid of Hamas, they must absorb the territory that is Gaza and displace its present population to Egypt, Jordan or Palestine.

Whether that is morally right or not is secondary if the goal is to rid Israel of Hamas and its hundreds of thousands of soldiers on their doorstep.

The reverse is of course that if Hamas is to have any chance to hurt Israel, it must murder civilians via terrorist methods, completely ignoring all the conventions and laws of war.

Which is why it is pointless to argue from a moral standpoint - there isn't one. (There never is, an objective one least of all, until the winner explains why the loser was evil.)

Also, why pick a side based on who is to be pitied the most? Why not pick based on who is a (potential) threat to you, and pick based on how one group or other behaves or has behaved in the past, referencing yourself and your own grouop?

Far more sensible approach than the endless splitting of hairs to find out who's the "good guys"; we should leave such stupidity to those americans who actually believe in such simplistic logic. Does it benefit Norway and the norwegians to support Hamas? Or palestinian arabs? Or does it benefit Norway more to support Israel? Or neither?

And consider this: by the logic used to condemn Israel by Hamas-supporters and dhimmi all over the West, Britain and the US shouldn't have bombed Germany at all during WW2: the munitions factories were staffed with civilians. Ridiculous.

And the flipside of that is, the british commando units engaging in "ungentlemanly warfare" (i.e. terrorism) inside Germany and German-occupied areas were war criminals and terrorists, just as Hamas is.

Tricky tricky it becomes, when one looks for morals in a practical issue.

Expand full comment
Kazimir Malevitch's avatar

Txs a lot Epimetheus!

I wish you the best for 2024! Take care!

Expand full comment
15 more comments...

No posts