Proof from the EMA that they don't have, or won't share, safety data on the 4th jab--HELP ME SPREAD THE WORD

Here are a bunch of emails I sent to the Norwegian and then European Medicines Agency, and while I'm publishing on this in German ‘alternative media’, this needs more visibility

Dear readers,

today is kind of a special day, as I’m about to leave my online persona (epimetheus) behind and tell you who I am. This isn’t about me, so, please keep on reading and get in touch, if you would know what to do / like to help.

In recent days, I’ve been publishing a couple of items on Covid Vaccine Injuries in Norway, based on content that originally appeared on my Substack. So, there’s nothing totally ‘new’ to you, my dear readers, but to many of the readers in German-language ‘alternative media’.

You can find these pieces by venturing over to the below-linked website, ‘tkp—the blog for science and politics’, in particular this piece on ‘Covid Vaccine Injuries in Norway’.

Over the course of my research, I also contacted the Institute of Public Health (IPH, Folkehelseinstituttet) and the Norwegian Medicines Agency (NMA, Legemiddelverket), enquiring about the following questions:

I sent a similar message to the NMA.

Initially, staff at both institutions responded swiftly, with the NMA writing the following:

So far, so good. Off I went and sent a comparable enquiry to the European Medicines Agency (EMA), specifically asking the following questions:

Is there any stopping condition that would cause the EMA to recommend pausing the mass vaccination campaign with these injectable products?

The original conditional marketing authorisation by the European Medicines Agency was given for a two-dose protocol. As the fourth dose is being rolled out, are there any further studies that address toxicology, specifically repeated administration of these products? If so, please share the data with me.

Given that these deaths are mainly (suspectedly) associated with the mRNA products by BioNTech/Pfizer and Moderna, did the ADR receive any funding whatsoever for education, training, or promotional materials from any of these companies?

This was done via the EMA’s online portal, and all I received in return was a brief, automatic reply that didn’t inspire much confidence, informing me that I would receive a reply ‘within 48 working hours’.

I sent that message on 1 August, and I didn’t hear anything from them before my media piece went live on 8 August.

But.

So, I continued to dig into the absurdities this particular situation entailed: the Norwegian Medicines Agency collects pharmacovigilance data and conveys in in the most generic and detail-deprived way possible to the Institute of Public Health. And the latter just announced that they will ‘offer’ a fourth dose of these injectable products to seniors, despite (because?) of the godawful safety record (to say nothing about the apparent lack of efficacy).

This is summarised in two postings from earlier this week:

Covid in Norway: as 4th jabs are rolled out, public health officialdom fears 'vaccine fatigue' as 1 out of 1,250 triple-jabbed require hospitalisation in July

Covid in Norway: Lies of Omission by the Institute of Public Health Suggests Massive Misinformation on Their Part

Here’s the rub, though:

Yesterday, I received an email from the EMA, and here’s what they tell me:

Yep, you read that correctly: the above-related questions are ‘complex’, hence ‘it may take longer to answer’, which in the context of my enquiry means ‘within 2 months’ from now, i.e., early-to-mid October.

It didn’t stop the IPH from offering a fourth jab—as of 9 August 2022—to close to 170,000 Norwegians. I’m convinced that there are many, many more all over the world who’ve done so.

Yet, by the EMA’s own admission, they either don’t have the data or won’t share it with those who took the 4th jab.

This is outrageous, as it is beyond the pale. And this must stop.

Until this will be stopped, hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of people will take a fourth dose whose safety or efficacy data the EMA cannot—will not—share with the public.

This is beyond outrageous, and this is what motivates today’s post.

Here’s what I’ve been doing until midnight last night:

I wrote yet another exposé about these shenanigans, a draft of which went to the same media outlet as above (tkp.at). This will be published on Monday, 15 August 2022.

I also sent yet another enquiry to both the Institute of Public Health and the Norwegian Medicines Agency, reproduced in full below:

I also sent copies of the EMA’s ‘answer’ to Austrian MP Gerald Hauser as well as another enquiry to the Austrian Ministry of Health.

I can’t do this alone, though, so I’m asking you for your help:

Please consider writing your own enquiries or copy from mine but write to the authorities in your country.

Please spread the information—from the EMA specifically—to anyone you know on Substack, social media, and your circles. Sunlight is the best disinfectant against the now-confirmed lack of data and science that underlies the public health authorities’ decision to ‘offer’ yet another dose of these injectable products.

Above all, please talk to your friends, relatives, neighbours, co-workers—really: everyone—about this and try to convince them not to take a fourth jab.

If you know a journalist who would publish on this in English, please get in touch via diefackel2punkt0@protonmail.com. (I’ve been trying to get this information out in English, and while I’ve found a publisher, they are currently vetting and reviewing the piece.)

So, I know that a couple of people whose audiences by far exceeds my list of subscribers are reading my posts, incl. Margaret Anna Alice, Brian Mowrey, and Joel Smalley, hence the last lines go out specifically to you:

Please share the information as widely as possible: we’re all in this fight together. I’m asking you to include the above information in your posts, use them in your comments to other writers.

If you’d like to obtain the original emails (the above are screen shots), please everyone—don’t hesitate to get in touch via diefackel2punkt0@protonmail.com.

Onwards we march, together.

EDIT: to help you, my dear readers, figure out who to contact in Europe (EU/EEC), please follow the below link to obtain an Excel list with contact details of every member-states’ ‘national competent authority’, which is Brussels-speak for ‘pharmacovigilance regulatory agency’:

https://www.ema.europa.eu/documents/other/emerging-safety-issues-esi-contact-points-national-competent-authority-nca-level_en.xlsx

Simply pick your country’s agency and, if you wish to, make use of the below standardised text: use it, modify it, include the above email from the EMA etc.—but send it today!

Dear madams and sirs,

As the 4th vaccination (2nd booster) of the current Covid-19 products is rolled out, I’m writing you to enquire about the safety and efficacy data.

It has come to my attention that the European Medicines Agency (EMA) deems any questions pertaining to repeat dose toxicity, vaccine efficacy, or the stopping conditions are ‘complex’ and seemingly cannot be answered right away. In an email, the EMA acknowledged that it would take up to two months before any such answers or data would be forthcoming.

Given that these injectable products have caused harm (see the EUDRA Vigilance database, but note that, e.g., in Norway there are already 260 dead and close to 60,000 adverse reactions logged as of mid-June, on which see https://legemiddelverket.no/Documents/Bivirkninger%20og%20sikkerhet/Rapporter%20og%20oversikter/Koronavaksiner/20220616%20Rapport%20over%20meldte%20bivirkninger%20av%20koronavaksine.pdf), I would like to obtain answers from you to the following questions:

Is there any stopping condition that would cause the public health authorities to recommend pausing the mass vaccination campaign with these injectable products?

The original conditional marketing authorisation by the European Medicines Agency was given for a two-dose protocol. As the fourth dose is being rolled out, are there any further studies that address toxicology, specifically repeated administration of these products? If so, please share the data with me.

Given that these deaths are mainly (suspectedly) associated with the mRNA products by BioNTech/Pfizer and Moderna, did the public health authorities receive any funding whatsoever for education, training, or promotional materials from any of these companies?

Thank you for a timely response.

Yours, sincerely: [sign your name]

Dear readers, please spread the word and send such emails!