Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Monty Carlo's avatar

Nice one (also on the prompt jobs to Grok) - I will pose this:

The "Bagmen" you so aptly name here are not the actual bagmen. The "Bagpeople" is the collective tax payer base of the major participant countries, pension funds as a majority holder of many of these "securities" are on the line if the faultline breaks.

Imagine a fractional reserve system that is cooked up by the very same institutional actors that collaborate as "primary dealers" when a new monetary regime is installed... would you say that is borderlining on installing a "mandatory purchase system" for government debt you can't really escape (since Treasuries sit on the "Secure Capital Top level 1"?)

No wonder everyone who already profits (and hence sits within the spheres of influence) loves the current setup and wants it to continue as much as possible, while those sitting within the system also promote it (ie they could be working in financial institutions, insurers, pension funds etc.)

Seeing how Basel III & IV declares these "securities" "safe" might be the most tragic thing. And central bank buying of Gold since ca. 2021 speaks more than fancy safety guarantees that will not hold (ie FDIC, or EU equivalents thereof which are even lower guarantees vs what FDIC promises).

Imagine finding out that in a 2007-style bank run / crash those guarantees are worth way less when a lot of incidents would need coverage.

The question then would be: would a bailout happen "Silicon Valley Bank style"? There was a special facility created just for that... how special (or big) would a facility need to be to cover not hair cutting Millions of depositors, potentially?

Strong questions and I fear the answers might be not helping a regular person's nightly sleeping habits.

Expand full comment
Rikard's avatar

"You can't vote the bankers out of office"

Old anarchist/red slogan.

Also, true.

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts