Halloween Scare Post: How Bad is Norway’s Vaxx—Compared to Germany?
Whatever official numbers may be worth: either Germans underreport their AEs by at least a factor of 2 or Norwegians are suffering silently much higher AE rates
How apt—it’s Halloween and during my daily tour de force through the news item the following piece by Sonja Padsch, which appeared at my second home over at tkp.at, caught my eye.
Detailing ‘vaxx injuries’ and their incidence in Germany, Ms. Padsch argues that vaccine injuries have ‘arrived in the mainstream’, citing a recent report by German state broadcaster ARD.
While this is, of course, quite noteworthy in and of itself, there’s something else that I wanted to bring to you attention the below screen grab:
As per the Paul Ehrlich Institute, the total number of injections in Germany is given as 182,717,880 doses; Germany has a resident population of 83,695,430 individuals (source).
Of these 182,717,880 doses, 323,684 adverse events were reported by the authorities, which is tantamount to 1.8 AEs per 1,000 doses.
Of these .3 AEs per 1,000 doses—or 54,815—were classified as ‘severe’ (schwer).
Ms. Padsch comments on the above statistics as follows:
The illustration is based on data from the Paul Ehrlich Institute and is probably intended to send the following message: an insane number of vaccine doses were administered—but only in.3 cases, i.e., a very small number (smaller than 1) is there a suspected serious adverse event. The fact that it is .3 serious side effects per 1,000 doses is stated, but it is written in a much smaller font. 1 in about 3,300 vaccine doses leads to a suspected serious adverse event, 1 in 1,000 with 3 injections per person.
While that is certainly a good example of gaslighting and lying by omission (it may also be intentional, i.e., a lie of commission), here’s what I thought: how do these numbers compare to Norway?
And, lo and behold, here’s what the current AE reporting from Norway (as of 20 Sept. 2022) says:
As per the National Medicines Agency (Legemiddelverket), there were
11,881,000 doses of injections administered;
There are currently 60,500 adverse events recorded, of which merely 78% (or 47,408) are considered ‘processed’;
So far, there are 6,884 serious (alvorlige) AEs processed.
According to Wikipedia (I know), Norway has currently 5,425,270 inhabitants.
Comparing Germany and Norway, here’s what I see
Germany’s population is slightly less-than-16 times that of Norway (factor 15.42).
Multiplication of the 11,881,000 doses administered in Norway by that factor 15.42 yields approx. 183.2m doses, i.e., Germany is only slightly less vaxxed to the hilt, but these numbers are essentially in sync (don’t ask me as to why Germans continue to suffer under these insane mandates; there’s none here since February 2022…)
Yet, once one multiplies the number of reported AEs in Norway (60,500) by the same factor of 15.42, the result would approx. 932,910 AE reports, i.e., a number that, if true, would be 2.88 times larger than the one admitted to by the Paul Ehrlich Institute.
What’s even ‘weirder’, though, is the severe AE category, for if we do the same basic calculus here (i.e., multiply the Norwegian number of severe AEs by 15.42), we’d get the number of 106,151 severe AEs in Germany, which is almost twice the number mentioned in the legacy media piece (factor 1.93).
EITHER Norwegians are getting qualitatively much worse products that result in comparatively much higher numbers of adverse events (while paying for somewhat greater freedom of no mandates with higher ‘collateral damages’)—
OR German authorities are significantly underreporting their ‘true’ AE rates (while suffering under the extension of these useless and insane mandates at the same time).
My money is on both counts, by the way, as both Germany and Norway are participating the same sham masquerading as the EU Commission’s questionable joint acquisition of these products.
Please, dear readers, let me know if I made a mistake in these ‘calculations’—and let me know what you think!
Your calculations are correct. And probably, true AE rates are much higher both in Norway and in Germany. For the latter, around 3 million AE-type events have been reported to the health insurance companies. If the physician can get money for the visit, he should also report it to the PEI, shouldn't he?
Two additional remarks:
- Classical fun fact: "ehrlich" means "honest" in German.
- I spent last week in the Netherlands, including visits to Den Haag and Rotterdam, crowded metro and all. During the whole week, I counted around ten masked people. Some of them Asians, some probably fellow German tourists.
Time for Courts and Tribunals!! Time to denounce and complaints! Time for Jail and refunds!
But in the meantime Watch this!! Love this guy!
https://twitter.com/just_mindy/status/1587148452055629826