Footnote: ESG Goals ⚭ Covid Activism
Talk about a match in hell…
Courtesy of @Prof_freedom
[I’ve translated the highlighted parts of the job advert, if, just in case, any of my readers is interested to apply…
Work at the Joanneum Museum in Graz, Styria…
We are committed to the equality and equity of all people, regardless of their biological gender and their gender identity, and as an employer we wish to shape an open and appreciative corporate culture.
Therefore, we actively oppose any discrimination based on gender, ethnicity, religion or belief, age, sexual orientation/identity, and health-related factors.
Applicants with proof of a COVID 19 vaccination will be given preference in the case of equal professional suitability.
Nuff said, I' suppose.
How do they get away making logically false and preposterous statements like that? Call them out for the equivocating devils they are.
OT, but since I brought it up earlier:
The Publisher's Organisation of Sweden is publicly demanding (not asking, demanding - the language used in swedish is in the imperative) that Sweden's Chancellor of Legal Matters (Justitiekansler) try to overturn the verdict against state media the other week, when state media were deemed to be in breach of the rules of conduct re: their slander and libel of Linda Karlström, a finnish woman and mother of five who had the audacity to criticise and question vaccine safety, efficiency and related issues.
I'm disgusted to the point of vomiting. The Publishers (who are a guild in all but name) actually have utter gall to call to state this:
"Domen är oroväckande då den uttryckligen säger att det svenska självreglerande medieetiska systemet är otillräckligt"
"The verdict is unsatisfactory since it explicitly says that the swedish system of self-regulating media-ethics is insufficicient"
So according to the publishers, the problem isn't the way they invaded a private person's home, publicly unknown and by no means a public person or celebrity, and inveigled themselves to her giving a false sense of security and then edited the material to make her look as unhinged as possbile.
No, the problem is that the verdict says that their self-regulating system (guild) doesn't work.
The very notion that aslong as you put the moniker "journalist" after your name, you can do whatever you please is so disgusting it's rage-inucing.
[https://samnytt.se/tidningsutgivarna-kraver-att-skadestandsdom-mot-svt-overklagas/]
The guilds own statement is linked in the article. Meanwhile, our parliament's legal committee is preparing a law that will make threats et c against journalists a special crime, much worse than if it was the same crime against me.
But only if they or their employer is part of the Publisher's Organisation. Which any non-narrative or not regime-aligned media is barred from. By the guild.