Flip Sides of the Same Coin: Vaxx Mandates and Digital IDs
A timely reminder about the dystopian vision of the WEF and its acolytes
Much ink has been spilled about the abominations floated in Austria during the WHO-declared, so-called ‘Pandemic™’. These pages began as a kind of chronicle of this ‘march of folly’ (B. Tuchman), which actually included very early references to the ‘technical’ aspects of Austro-Covidistan’s shameful ‘vaxx mandate’ as early as January 2022:
I’m bringing this up because somewhere on my ‘X’ feed, I saw someone re-posting the below-reproduced tabloid article about these ‘technical’ details from April 2022. While I do think ‘better late than never’, the main problem is—that the importance of what was proposed: the linking of federal residency register data (administered by the police) with the vaccine registry (administered by the health care provider ELGA)—was never really discussed.
What was—really: is—at stake here is nothing less than significant limitations on individuals and groups based on spurious decisions and ‘enforceable’ via digital identifiers. In other words: ‘ze great Rezet’, to paraphrase real-world villain and winner of the second place in the Blofeld Impersonator contest, Klaus Schwab.
So, next the piece from April 2022, followed by a few bottom lines; as always, translation and emphases mine.
Explosive New Paper Renders the Vaxx Mandate Nil
By Rene Findenig, Heute, 8 April 2022 [source]
ELGA [the LLC in charge of electronic patient records] has submitted an explosive paper to the government on the COVID-19 Compulsory Vaccination Act: it says that compulsory vaccination is not feasible.
The document by ELGA, entitled ‘Data Protection Impact Assessment’ [orig. Datenschutz-Folgenabschätzung], comprises 87 pages and addresses questions pertaining to ‘data processing within the scope of compulsory vaccination in the central vaccination register’—and it puts the vaccination requirement to rest, at least in the planned form. According to information available to Heute, the document has already been sent to the government. The content is tough: ELGA considers compulsory vaccination as unfeasible, disproportionate, unsuitable, and questionable in terms of data protection on several levels. If the data protection authority now also agrees, compulsory vaccination will probably be history [good riddance].
It is reported that through the COVID-19 Compulsory Vaccination Act, ELGA is responsible for ‘the personal processing of exceptions to the general COVID-19 vaccination requirement in the Central Vaccination Register’ as well as ‘the transmission of vaccination data and exceptions to the Minister of Health, among other things, for the imposition of fees and penalties against those who have not been vaccinated’ will be imposed. The data processing transferred to ELGA is a necessary condition ‘for the implementation of the COVID-19 vaccination requirement and therefore logically presupposes this’, it continues [well, logic was kinda not the strong suit of ‘the experts™’, I’d add; note the chain of command here: either the LLC (ELGA) would access Interior Ministerial residency registry data (or vice versa), which is then submitted to a third party—the Health Ministry—that should not have access to either data…].
There is no suitability because only an irrelevant proportion of unvaccinated people will be vaccinated due to compulsory vaccination.
When assessing the admissibility of processing the data, the ELGA also examined the proportionality of the vaccination requirement—and the verdict was devastating. ‘Measures—such as compulsory COVID-19 vaccination—can only be proportionate if, among other things, they are suitable and necessary. Both criteria are currently not met’, says the summary. Suitability does not exist ‘because only an irrelevant proportion of unvaccinated people will be vaccinated due to compulsory vaccination.’ [let’s not mince words here: this is extremely important as the share of Austrians who elected to skip these injections—approx. 25% of the total population—did not budge no matter what, which is highly instructive: gov’t agencies knew that, and whatever reason they gave for not doing what the Austro-Covidian gov’t tried might have to do with a rather simplistic cost-benefit analysis]
The necessity, in turn, does not exist for several reasons. It cannot be assumed with certainty that the normal bed capacities in the hospitals will be overloaded; if the Omicron variant predominates, an overload of the hospitals' intensive care bed capacities can be ruled out; there is already an immunity rate of over 90% in Austria and scientific arguments would only be medical ones pertaining to product safety [sic] ‘but ignore the social dimension of a general compulsory vaccination’ requirement. In addition, ‘all of the more lenient measures have not yet been exhausted’, according to ELGA:
A COVID-19 vaccination requirement that is subject to sanctions is therefore not proportionate under the given circumstances, which is why—subsequently—moving to enforce COVID-19 vaccination requirement is also inadmissible.
Explosive: the paper also says that the COVID-19 vaccination requirement is fraught with ‘significant risks’, such as the ‘polarisation of society, the overload of public administration, a great potential for disputes in labor law, a general loss of trust in public health measures, or an irreversible loss of trust in ELGA for imposing penalties based on health data’.
Conclusion: ‘A COVID-19 vaccination requirement subject to sanctions is therefore not proportionate under the given circumstances, which is why—as a result—processing for the purpose of enforcing the COVID-19 vaccination requirement is also inadmissible.’
ELGA ‘will not carry out a positive data protection impact assessment’, it says in summary, because a consultation of the General Data Protection Regulation must be carried out. ‘However, as long as no personal data is processed, it is permissible to prepare the systems technically in the event that the COVID-19 vaccination requirement is later admissible’, says the ELGA. However, if data processing were to be carried out despite the impermissibility, ‘in the worst case scenario, claims for damages against ELGA LLC in the billions could result’.
Bottom Lines: Get Ready for the Next Round
As I’ve documented in these pages—search for ‘Covidistan Annals’—the injection obligation failed due to massive and sustained popular protests, the spectre of overwhelming public administration, and its singularity among Western nations.
I’m very certain that all other Western (wannabe) tyrants were closely monitoring these developments, esp. among the sociopaths and psychopaths running—and staffing—the various EU institutions.
Why? Because they were, and still are, all dead-set on introducing digital IDs for everyone. For now, they are ‘voluntary’ and sold as to ‘increase your convenience’. This is, of course, BS and a form of gaslighting that would probably make Goebbels, Stalin, and Mao proud.
Once everyone ‘needs’ one of these digital IDs, and has one, the devil, as always, lurks in the details. The most ‘advanced’ Nordic countries already have such digital IDs (I have one, too, and I f****** hate it), but so far these have not been weaponised.
Here in Norway, the digital ID is delivered by a public-private partnership (PPP) called ‘BankID’. This is also the model the EU Commission has chosen (no surprises there):
Your personal data tells your life’s story; you should be the one to control it and decide when and with whom your data is shared.
The EU Digital Identity Wallet makes it possible. It will be a secure and easy way for European citizens, residents and businesses to prove who they are when accessing digital services. The wallet app will enable you to safely obtain, store and share important digital documents about yourself and electronically sign or seal documents.
Providing the documents needed to open a new bank account, enrol in a university abroad, or apply for your next dream job will be both easy and secure. And your privacy will always be respected; you control what data is shared and who has access to it. [that is, unless the rules change]
The Digital Identity Regulation will soon be adopted. Once passed it will enable the digital transformation of the public sector, allowing for more services to be accessed digitally, including across borders.
This is an unveiled threat. The EU Commission’s double-speak renders this clear, as I’ve detailed a few weeks ago:
See what I mean? The EU member-states will depend on ‘the wallet provider’—i.e., a big tech cartel that will be lavishly endowed with taxpayer money—who may (I’m betting the farm on it) be permitted to share data for ‘product development’ or other things.
Good-bye privacy, welcome tyranny. Read more here:
We’ve already seen what happens in an ‘emergency’, such as the WHO-declared, so-called ‘Pandemic™’: if in doubt, ad-hoc measures like the infamous ‘Covid Passport’ are extended beyond ‘necessity’ (there never was a chance in hell that these ‘Green Passports’ did anything about it).
There is ample evidence that this will done time and again.
‘Skynet’ is what’s coming for us.
They’ve managed to fool a lot of the people once; they’ll certainly try to do so again.
Don’t be a fool.
Not having Bank-Id or e-identification makes life pretty hilarious sometimes, here in Sweden. The reason for this is, there's no law requiring me to have one. However, there is law and precedence cases stating that all public works, civil services and private companies acting on behalf of the public sector /must/ provide services equally, no matter if someone has an e-id of any kind, or not.
So technically speaking, despite the buses not accepting cash, they are compelled by law to do so provided you pay the exact sum. Now, the driver would refuse, the bus would be held up, and you'd have to go to civil court (and pay for that yourself), and so on - but precedence for this was established years ago, when an elderly man actually took such a case all the way to Regeringsrätten (the highest civil court, and the one that sets precedence).
So thanks to that, when I go to see my doctor, the hospital has to mail a paper bill to my home address. And legislation is in the works for forcing critical service providers to be compelled by law to accept cash payments (petrol stations, pharamcies, and such).
They sure are tech-happy here, but there's a lot of push-back too, from within the system.
Yep, yep, yep