Depopulation Watch: Official Data from Europe shows Average Decline in Live Births of -7%

'Vaccination' is positively correlated with the decline, infection isn't.

Today, I’d like to draw your attention to an excellent data compilation on the decline of birth rates in highly ‘vaccinated’ European countries. Analysts from the Team Hagemann have thankfully compiled a set of data from 24 European, and they are thankfully providing their findings in English, German, and French.

The notion of declining birth rates has been a topic across Substack and elsewhere, hence I thought you’d might be interested in Hagemann’s analysis, too.

Also, this is a 91 page-long compilation, which means that I shall merely reproduce its conclusions and findings, as well as add a few bottom lines. Let’s hope this posting will find its way to others who work on this topic, in particular as the cut-off date is 25 Aug. 2022, i.e., it is about as up-to-date as anything else.

The above picture was taken from Hagemann’s report and can be found on p. 83.

For readability, I’ve omitted all references; all emphases are mine.

---

Data discussion (pp. 87)

The present data analysis attempts to focus on 2 variables, namely birth rates and vaccination frequency. Assuming that the realization of the desire to have children depends on numerous factors such as the economic situation, plans, and perspectives for the child and the family, the current situation is highly sensitive and prone to disruption. Consequently, birth rates can be seen as a sensitive indicator of social, economic, and medical developments.

The pandemic obviously had a strong influence on the decision to have a child. Several factors might have contributed. On the one hand there was a massive decline in birth rates at the beginning of 2021, which I have called the ‘lockdown trough’. It is very pronounced in the 4 countries that stood out with particularly harsh lockdown measures: France, Belgium, Spain, and Portugal. The temporarily forced withdrawal into the closest private environment did not promote the desire to have children but rather caused it to fall due to general uncertainty and other psychological effects. In some countries, such as Switzerland, the Netherlands, and Hungary, a kind of catch-up effect was found following the restrictions and subsequently the so-called relaxations.

An effect of Covid 19 vaccinations is evident in the global decline in birth rates 9 months after having started the vaccination campaign in the age group 18-49, evident in almost every country. Since this part of the vaccination campaign fell in the second half of spring 2021, in which hardly any lockdown measures but rather ‘relaxations’ were implemented, relevant psychological and social moments appear very unlikely. If any, a reverse effect, i.e., an increase in the desire to have children was to be expected for that phase. The correlation with the vaccination campaign and the situation at that time suggests that there were physiological influences by vaccination on the fertility of women or men. In support of this, the adverse reactions of the vaccines reported in Eudravigilance and US-VAERS, especially heavy menstrual bleeding and irregular menstruation, provide strong evidence of causality. Recently, signs of decreased male fertility were detected in male semen donors.

Summing up all reports from the countries investigated, yielded a minus of 110,059 births, related to the selection of European countries studied, with large nations such as Italy and Great Britain still to be evaluated. If serious efforts were made to clarify the situation, close cooperation between clinics and medical specialists could provide valid information for the urgently needed re-evaluation of the risk-benefit assessment, which is obviously not wanted under the great influence of politics and pharmaceutical industry.

Conclusion (p. 88)

The first half of 2022 was marked by a significant decline in births ranging from 1.3% in France to 19% in Romania.

In 15 countries this decline exceeded 4%, in 7 countries it exceeded 10%.

A significant negative correlation between birth rates decline and vaccination frequency is found in 13 of 18 countries. In Finland, Switzerland, the Netherlands, Latvia, Austria, Germany, and Lithuania, as well as for Europe as a whole, the correlation analysis even yielded p-values of 0.005 or less.

No correlation was found between the decline in birth rates and the incidence of Covid-19 infections or hospitalizations assigned to Covid-19.

Adverse reactions related to the female reproductive organs and study findings related to male fertility point to a causal interpretation of the association of birth declines and the Covid-19 vaccinations.

Observations of fertility centres for corresponding signs should be collected.

With reference to the Bradford-Hill criteria, a relationship temporality between the decline in births and the course of the initial vaccination campaign (doses 1 and 2) nine months earlier could be demonstrated. There was a very high analogy between the European countries. The uniformly observed decline in the number of births with a temporal connection to the start of the vaccination campaign is thus not an isolated national phenomenon. Some countries are still withholding their data. Norway has sent data for the second quarters, but is currently withholding data for the first quarters.

Given the considerable individual and social relevance of the link between vaccination campaigns and declining birth rates, the immediate suspension of Covid-19 vaccination for all persons of childbearing and reproductive age should be called for.

Data on stillbirths, spontaneous, and any other abortions must be provided in a timely manner.

It remains to be explored:

• How exactly does the Covid-19 vaccine exert its apparent deleterious effect on female reproductive capacity?

• Does the Covid-19 vaccine also affect male reproductive capacity?

• How long do these effects last?

My remarks and comments are not intended to exclude any interpretations, they are as factual as possible. Waiting for traditional scientific publications is unacceptable in view of the considerable individual and social threats posed by the emergency-approved vaccines.

---

Bottom Lines

This is important stuff, in particular as more and more reports are coming out that document the potential harm of these injectable products.

One of the great problems, though, remains the hard-if-not-impossible-to-quantify notion of spontaneous pregnancy terminations in the first trimester. I would suspect that the situation is far worse than what Raimund Hagemann and his team have established.

Remember, spontaneous pregnancy terminations in the first trimester are seldomly reported, yet what I was able to find on short notice incidates that the incidence is quite high, both for medically-induced and other reasons.

Take, say, this paper Cohaine et al. (2017), which found that (my emphasis)

Among 53,479 different women admitted to labor and delivery ward, 43% of women reported having had 1 or more first trimester spontaneous miscarriages; 27% reported having had one, 10% two, 4% three, 1.3% four, 0.6% five and 0.05% reported having 6-16 spontaneous first trimester miscarriages. 18.5% had one or more first trimester miscarriages before their first live birth.

My expectation is that the overall decline of live births is actually but the tip of the iceberg.