Covid in Norway--vaxx injury update: there were 13 deaths reported after injection by 14 Jan. 2021 (it's 255 and counting now)--what's your number to stop these products?

The NMA's first report (14 Jan. 2021), published two weeks after the injections were rolled out, showed the safety profile of the Covid-19 products to be much, much worse than, say, Pandemrix

I would like to take this opportunity to briefly comment on a few issues mentioned by my (apparently) Norwegian readers in reaction to my latest piece. Published two days ago, I called it ‘vaxx injuries edition’, and I tried, as best as I can, to document how badly the Norwegian public health authorities decayed in the ten+ years since the swine flu pandemic of 2009-12.

Using publicly available reports from both the Institute of Public Health (IPH) and the National Medicines Agency (NMA), which I combined with legacy media pieces and a couple of other sources (papers), I was able to show that back in 2009/10, the swine flu vaccination campaign was shut down after 1,449 AEs, 584 of which were deemed severe, at a time when 2.2m injections were administered.

Fast forward to spring 2021, specifically the NMA AE report from 18 May 2021 (source here, p. 4), with approx. the same number of doses administered, there were way, way more both ‘light’ and ‘severe’ AEs with the Covid-19 products:

Yet, the injection program—if judged by the Norwegian public health authorities’ standards less than 15 years ago—must have been shut down…well, when exactly?

Q: when should the Covid-19 injections have been stopped?

You see, for the post two days ago I looked for the approx. point in time when there were about the same number of injections (2.2m) administered, which allowed me to make an informed deliberation about the comparative safety profiles of these products.

Yet, I kept wondering when the first signals were emerging, hence I went back to the dedicated NMA website and started looking into the reports from winter and spring 2021.

A: mid-January 2021, if I was in charge.

I didn’t have to look very far, for I started with the first one, dated 14 January 2021, which is to say that this report was published two weeks into the roll-out of the nation-wide injection campaign. Please forgive me if this spoils your breakfast, but here’s the data:

According to the National Imunisation Register (SYSVAK), there were 47,101 injections administered by 14 January 2021 (on the IPH’s website, if you scroll down to the ‘number of vaccinated persons’ graph and move your cursor to 14 Jan. 2021, it’ll show that number).

There were 29 suspected AEs in the NMA’s first report dated 14 January 2021 (p. 1-2, note that the report has no numbered pages yet), which seems reasonably low a number at first sight.

Here are tables 1 and 2 (with the sex and age breakdowns, p. 1), and note that there were 4 out of these 29 AE reports that affected 18-69yo people ‘already’:

While these numbers are super-small compared to 47,101 injections administered at that point in time (it’s an AE incidence rate of .0006157%), table 3 on the next page (2) shows the severity of these AEs:

Yep, you saw that correctly—13 out of these 29 AEs resulted and/or contributed to an early death (dødelig utfall), and another 9 out of the same number of AEs were classified as severe or serious (alvorlige…ekskl. dødsfall).

Before we move on to the IPH’s most recent weekly report (the subject of my next post), let me ask you this:

What is the number of severe AEs, incl. deaths, that’s ‘o.k.’ for the authorities?

If you’d find yourself in a position of power and influence like, say, Mr. Preben Aavitsland, the Head of the IPH’s Division for Infection Control and Environmental Health, how many deaths would it take until you determined that the roll-out of these products may need to be halted and thoroughly investigated?

Hint: as the NMA’s most recent AE report dated 1 March 2022 shows, and you can find these data in table 3 (p. 7), the tentative answer is—these numbers are obviously greater than…

• the 255 deaths that occurred in ‘close temporal proximity to the administration’ of the Covid-19 injections

• the 5,413 serious AEs documented so far, to say nothing about the ‘light’ AEs

• and, when reading this, keep in mind that the NMA hasn’t processed more than 51% of the reports on suspected AEs yet (although they say they are prioritising the severe ones while doing so)

Now I’m disgusted by the answer and its implications, it’s before I had breakfast, and I hope you shall forgive me for potentially spoiling your breakfast, too.

It makes me wonder, though, how these people—like Ms. Stoltenberg (IPH Director) and Mr. Aavitsland—sleep at night, to say nothing about the individuals who brought the world these ‘safe and effective’ products.

What, then, is to be done?

Yes, we were (are) mislead by the charlatans at BioNTech, Pfizer, Moderna, etc., but we are treated with so much more contempt by the public health authorities and their willing collaborators in professional politics and the legacy media.

I maintain yesterday’s verdict: J’accuse.

We need to find a judge who will hear these accusations, issue subpoenas to hear from those responsible, and have a jury determine the verdict.

That might sound outlandishly idealistic, but I think the alternative—pitchforks and revolutionary tribunals without much proceures and the like—appears infinitely worse, doesn’t it?