Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Rikard's avatar

I feel sick reading this. It's like watching a lobotomy.

While nationalism has been a prominent feature of the exceedingly few examples of real-life fascist states, fascism is not a component of nationalism, and the chatbot (which is what ChatGPT is in reality) seems written to conflate weighted options creating a false binary divide; left/right.

There's no left/right in ideology or in politics, never was and never will be - it is purely mental imagery originating with the british (originally roman) style of parliament with one side being incumbent and the other in opposition, and with how the governing assembly before and during the French Revolution was seated.

It has been something which has depressed me for decades, that centuries old seating arrangements have created a doxa about politics and ideologies which simpy is no more true than the doctrine of signatures.

Liberalism must always be separated into basic/classic and neo-varieties, as they are very different beasts indeed, as different to each other as national socialism and socialist democracy was.

Communism must be understood based on the main cultures that have tried to implement it: russian, german, chinese, korean, and a couple of others. While ruthless, there's a world of difference between the german post WW2-communism and present-day chinese such.

Fascism must be narrowed down and specified in the same way. The original version grew out of italian marxism and communism, when Mussolini realised that international communism in reality meant that every nation which turned communist would become a de facto political vassal under Lenin's Russia - the solution was to introduce romantic neostalgic nationalism instead of atheistic in-theory humanitarian and egalitarian internationalism. One could say that Mussolini's fascism née marxist communism was simply nothing more than honest communism with the semantics and rethorics filed off and replaced with the aforementioned neostalgic romanticism.

Sorry for the ramble, but I'm "professionally upset" by the stupidity called AI, which will soon infect the greater majority with a doctrinate purity not seen since before Luther and Gutenberg.

Expand full comment
Witzbold's avatar

Recently I was in Prague for work and I can recommend a visit to the Communism Museum, it will leave one under no illusions as to the failings of that particular 'ism' which reigned in Czech and Slovakia after World War II.

I also picked up Vaclav Havel's, "Power of the Powerless", his political essay from 1978 (the period between Czechoslovakia's crushed revolution of 1968 "Prague Spring" and their successful "Velvet Revolution" in 1988. I find it to be much more than just a critique of the Communist regime of his day, criticizing any and all totalitarian systems which suppress individual expression and freedom. It startlingly speaks to our present moment of increasing censorship and growing state authoritarianism in the so-called West.

The copy I picked up is from 2018 at the height of Trump Derangement Syndrome and features a predictable foreword by the American academic Timothy Snyder though it might as well have been written Chat GPT. What I am increasingly sensing is a disconnect by those who see themselves as 'non-right', in that they are filled with such self-righteousness they are blinded to their own failings and hypocrisies. I fear we are stumbling if not sleep-walking into a new totalitarianism.

Did you see the Dems try to censor RFK at the hearings on censorship yesterday? I know it's cliche at this stage but, "the center cannot hold" much longer, oder?

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts