Brief Notes on Yesterday's HPV Piece (UPDATED)

New information, further particulars--and many more troubling issues

Since I’ve posted yesterday’s piece, I’ve received many additional pieces of information. Thank you, my dear readers, for pointing these out. I’ve compiled them and some follow-up work below.

Before we get there, though, I’d like to direct my German-language readers to a slightly amended German-language version, which I posted earlier today over at TKP.at.

The first thing I’d like to note is one of the commenters in that German-language piece who claims second-hand knowledge of the late Jasmin Soriat:

Translation mine (note that I cannot confirm the veracity of the comment, but why would anyone who’s not beholden to Big Pharma lie about that?):

I did not know Jasmin Soriat personally, but many of my work colleagues at the time knew her well. I still remember very well the shock that her unexpected death caused in all of us at that time. The cause—HPV vaccination—was also correctly identified and there were no doubts. As my colleagues told me, Jasmin was a bright, cheerful and, popular girl.

I find the hypocritical recommendation of this vaccine all the more disgraceful, which became apparent in autumn 2021: In the HPV vaccination campaign for 10-12 year olds at that time, around 2/3 of the girls AND boys were sent for vaccination by their parents.

I cherish the hope that more and more people will wake up and that more and more parents will endeavour to make an independent self-confident decision for the benefit of their children.

Further particulars, in no detailed order

Friend-of-these-pages Fabian Spieker (whose Substack Vigilance per VAERS is highly recommended) posted on the HPV injections, pointing out, that

according to VAERS Gardasil and Gardasil-9 are also associated with post-menopausal FSH levels in young women.

Mind you: these injections are pushed onto children from age 9 onwards. Please find out more here:

HPV vaccines are reducing fertility

Next up, Giulia Filipelli Loewy posted a link to an article entitled ‘Gardasil’s Long Shadow of Autoimmunity Confirmed — Again — by New Study’ over at Children’s Health Defence:

Girls and young women experiencing complications from Merck’s Gardasil HPV vaccine show symptoms and biological markers of autoimmune conditions, according to a new study published in The Journal of Autoimmunity.

Thirdly, I’d like to direct you ExcessDeathAU’s Substack, which contains tons of interesting information from ‘Down Under’, detailed, in alia, Australia’s role in gain-of-function ‘research’:

Australia’s gain-of-function research

Finally, I’d like to highlight a peer-reviewed study that appeared in the British Medical Journal written by Peter Doshi et al. Entitled, ‘Adjuvant-containing control arms in pivotal quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine trials: restoration of previously unpublished methodology’, who re-analysed the clinical trial data for Gardasil and Gardasil-9.

Here are their main findings (my emphases):

Results Across data sources, the control was inconsistently reported as ‘placebo’-containing aluminium adjuvant (sometimes with dose information). Amorphous aluminium hydroxyphosphate sulfate (AAHS) was not mentioned in any trial registry entry, but was mentioned in all publications and CSRs. In three of five trials, consent forms described the control as an ‘inactive’ substance. No rationale for the selection of the control was reported in any trial publication, register, consent form, CSR synopsis or protocol. Three trials reported the rationale for choice of control in CSRs: to preserve blinding and assess the safety of HPV virus-like particles as the ‘safety profile of (AAHS) is well characterised’.

Conclusions The stated rationale of using AAHS control—to characterise the safety of the HPV virus-like particles—lacks clinical relevance. A non-placebo control may have obscured an accurate assessment of safety and the participant consent process of some trials raises ethical concerns.

EDIT: reader Sanjoy Mahajan further pointed to the following publication:

The HPV Vaccine On Trial: Seeking Justice For A Generation Betrayed (2018), on which see also here. This book contains evidence of the use of fake placebos (which, in the case of the HPV injections, contain aluminium, which are themselves toxic. Next to these, the injections seem quite o.k.-ish in terms of their safety profile. Do check out Peter Doshi et al.’s study cited above.

Please help raising awareness.