[right-hand, German-language text] 19 Dec. 2023
Health – Answer – hib 957/2023
No Adverse Effects of DNA Fragments
Berlin: According to information by the Federal Government there is no scientific evidence that the DNA fragments contained in the anti-Covid vaccines may lead to unsolicited adverse effects. Each batch of the Covid-19 mRNA vaccines must be quality-checked by the manufacturer. These results are then part of the batch release protocol, which is subsequently evaluated, according to the answer by the Federal Government (20/9697) to a small enquiry by the parliamentary AfD faction (20/9412).
Bottom Lines
Trust must be earned, and if it has been—continues to be—betrayed, it’ll take a long time to be restored.
This is all so sad.
I know of two sudden fatal cancer victims and another who lives. I also know of 3 new diabetics since jabbinations. It is very sad, indeed. Yesterday, I watched an interview on UK Columnn org website with Debbie Evans interviewing Dr Chris Flowers, who is part of The Daily Clout team of voluntary researchers going through Schizer's Trial data. Report 89 just published which clearly shows no benefit to taking them, and EMA did not ask questions that they should have but they granted emergency use anyway. Not absolutely clear on what he said about Comirnity so will listen again. He mentioned Process 2, with the DNA contamination only applying to the Comirnity named product which subsequently got full authorisation in Europe. However, this was never manufactured or distributed in USA where the original EUA is the only one used. If pandemic over, why are they allowed to use emergency products. We are very fortunate to learn that Schizer is thinking ahead regarding our health needs, especially relating to cancers as he uncannily predicts 1 in 3 will get cancer, maybe whole families, so they've bought up a company making cancer treaatments which, with Schizer's help, will be able to manufacture 'at scale.' Thank goodness we have these wonderful people looking out for us!
This is criminal. Even if it is the interpreter messing up, it is still criminal; and the odds of there being no politics behind what can only be called malicious fraud with intent to cause injury/death... well, I've got a bridge in Crimea to sell to anyone believing that it is an innocent mistake.
Can german press really ignore this?